← Seneca the Younger

Moral Letters to Lucilius

§108.29-108.39

Reading for Life and Practicing What One Preaches

Seneca illustrates how philosophers, philologists, and grammarians extract different information from the same book according to their respective interests, asserting that we should read to live rather than to study words. He criticizes philosophical teachers who do not practice what they preach and concludes the letter by emphasizing action over talk.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§108.29

​Praeterea, inquit, hoc senectuti cognomen inposuit, tristem illam vocat: "subeunt morbi tristisque senectus." Alio loco dicit: "Pallentesque habitant morbi tristisque senectus." Non est quod mireris1 ex eadem materia suis quemque studiis apta colligere; in eodem prato bos herbam quaerit, canis leporem, ciconia lacertam.

​Besides, he says, Vergil imposed this cognomen on old age; he calls it sad: ‘ diseases creep in and sad old age ‘ In another place he says: ‘ And pale diseases and sad old age dwell. ‘ There is no reason why you should wonder that each person collects from the same material what is suited to his own studies; in the same meadow the ox seeks grass, the dog the hare, the stork the lizard.

§108.30

​Cum Ciceronis librum de Re Publica prendit hinc philologus aliquis,hinc grammaticus, hinc philosophiae deditus, alius alio curam suam mittit. Philosophus admiratur contra iustitiam dici tam multa potuisse.2 Cum ad hanc eandem lectionem philologus accessit, hoc subnotat: Duos Romanos reges esse, quorum alter patrem non habet, alter matrem. Nam de Servi matre dubitatur; Anci pater nullus, Numae nepotis, dicitur.

​When some philologist on one hand, some grammarian on the other, and some devoted to philosophy on the other, takes up Cicero’s book on the Republic, each directs his attention to a different thing. The philosopher admires that so many things could be said against justice. When the philologist approaches this same reading, he notes this: that there are two Roman kings, one of whom has no father, the other no mother. For Servius’s mother is doubted; Ancus is said to have no father, and to be the grandson of Numa.

§108.31

​Praeterea notat eum, quem nos dictatorem dicimus et in historiis ita nominari legimus, aput antiquos magistrum populi vocatum. Hodieque id extat in auguralibus libris, et testimonium est, quod qui ab illo nominatur, magister equitum est. Aeque notat Romulum perisse solis defectione; provocationem ad populum etiam a regibus fuisse; id ita in pontificalibus libris esse et alii quiqui putant et Fenestella.

​Besides, he notes that he whom we call dictator, and read named so in histories, was called magister populi among the ancients. Today also this exists in the augural books, and the evidence is that he who is named by him is the magister equitum. Equally he notes that Romulus perished by a solar eclipse; that there was an appeal to the people even from the kings; that this is so in the pontifical books, as Fenestella and others, whoever they are, think.

§108.32

​Eosdem libros cum grammaticus explicuit, primum verba expressa, reapse dici a Cicerone, id est re ipsa, in commentarium refert, nec minus sepse, id est se ipse. Deinde transit ad ea, quae consuetudo saeculi mutavit, tamquam ait Cicero: "quoniam sumus ab ipsa calce eius interpellatione revocati." Hanc quam nunc in circo cretam vocamus, calcem antiqui dicebant. Deinde Ennianos colligit versus et in primis illos de ​Africano scriptos: "cui nemo civis neque hostis Quibit pro factis reddere opis pretium." Ex eo se ait intellegere, opem aput antiquos non tantum auxilium significasse, sed operam. Ait enim Ennius neminem potuisse Scipioni neque civem neque hostem reddere operae pretium. Felicem deinde se putat, quod invenerit, unde visum sit Vergilio dicere:

​When the grammarian has unfolded the same books, first he enters into his commentary the expressive words, that reapse is said by Cicero, that is, re ipsa, and no less sepse, that is, se ipse. Then he passes to those things which the custom of the age has changed, as Cicero says: “since we have been recalled from the very calx by his interruption.” This which we now call creta in the circus, the ancients called calx. Then he collects the verses of Ennius, and especially those written about ​Africanus: ’ whom no citizen nor enemy will be able to return the reward of ops for his deeds. ‘ From this he says he understands that ops among the ancients signified not only help (auxilium), but work (opera). For Ennius says that no one, neither citizen nor enemy, was able to return to Scipio the reward of work (operae pretium). Then he thinks himself happy because he found whence it seemed fit to Vergil to say:

§108.34

​quem super ingens porta tonat caeli. Ennium hoc ait Homero subripuisse, Ennio vergilium. Esse enim apud Ciceronem in his ipsis de Re Publica hoc epigramma Enni: "Si fas endo plagas caelestum ascendere cuiquam est, Mi soli caeli maxima porta patet." ​Sed ne et ipse, dum aliud ago, in philologum aut grammaticum delabar, illud admoneo, auditionem philosophorum lectionemque ad propositum beatae vitae trahendam, non ut verba prisca aut ficta captemus et translationes inprobas figurasque dicendi, sed ut profutura praecepta et magnificas voces et animosas, quae mox in rem transferantur. Sic ista ediscamus, ut quae fuerint verba, sint opera.

’above whom the huge gate of heaven thunders.’ He says that Ennius snatched this from Homer, and Vergil from Ennius. For he says that in these very books of Cicero on the Republic there is this epigram of Ennius: ‘ If it is right for anyone to ascend into the regions of the heavenly ones, For me alone the greatest gate of heaven lies open. ‘ ​But lest I myself also, while doing something else, slide into a philologist or grammarian, I give this warning, that the hearing and reading of philosophers must be drawn toward the purpose of a happy life, not so that we may catch archaic or made-up words and far-fetched metaphors and figures of speech, but so that we may grasp beneficial precepts and magnificent and courageous voices which are soon to be transferred into action. Let us learn these things in such a way that what were words may become deeds.

§108.36

​Nullos autem peius mereri de omnibus mortalibus3 iudico quam qui philosophiam velut aliquod artificium venale didicerunt, qui aliter vivunt quam vivendum esse praecipiunt. Exempla enim se ipsos inutilis disciplinae circumferunt nulli non vitio, quod insequuntur, obnoxii.

​But I judge none to deserve worse of all mortals than those who have learned philosophy as if it were some saleable trade, who live otherwise than they prescribe that one must live. For they carry themselves around as examples of useless learning, subject to every vice which they pursue.

§108.37

​Non magis mihi potest quisquam talis prodesse praeceptor quam gubernator in tempestate nauseabundus. Tenendum rapiente fluctu gubernaculum, luctandum cum ipso mari, eripienda sunt vento vela;4 quid me potest adiuvare rector navigii attonitus et vomitans? Quanto maiore putas vitam tempestate iactari quam ullam ratem? Non est loquendum, sed gubernandum.

​No such teacher can be of more use to me than a steersman who is seasick in a storm. The rudder must be held while the wave snatches, one must wrestle with the sea itself, the sails must be snatched from the wind; how can the helmsman of a ship assist me when he is astounded and vomiting? By how much greater a storm do you think life is tossed than any vessel? One must not talk, but steer.

§108.38

​Omnia quae dicunt, quae turba audiente iactant, aliena sunt; dixit illa Platon, dixit Zenon, dixit Chrysippus et Posidonius et ingens agmen nostrorum tot ac talium. Quomodo probare possint sua esse, monstrabo: faciant, quae dixerint.

​All things which they say, which they boast with the crowd listening, are alien; Plato said those things, Zeno said them, Chrysippus and Posidonius said them, and a huge army of our own so many and such men. How they can prove those things to be their own, I will show: let them do what they have said.

§108.39

​Quoniam quae volueram ad te perferre, iam dixi, nunc desiderio tuo satis faciam et in alteram epistulam integrum, quod exegeras, transferam, ne ad rem spinosam et auribus erectis curiosisque audiendam lassus accedas. VALE.

​Since I have already said what I wanted to convey to you, now I will satisfy your desire and transfer the whole matter which you had demanded, untouched, to another letter, lest you, exhausted, approach a thorny matter which is to be heard with erect and curious ears. FAREWELL.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 108.29Non est quod mireris

    The construction Non est quod followed by the subjunctive (mireris) is an impersonal expression meaning 'there is no reason why you should...'. The subjunctive originates from a relative clause of characteristic or result.

  2. 108.30contra iustitiam dici tam multa potuisse

    An accusative with infinitive (AcI) construction serving as the object of the verb admiratur. Here, tam multa is the subject accusative and dici potuisse is the infinitive, expressing admiration at the fact that so many things could be said against justice.

  3. 108.36peius mereri de omnibus mortalibus

    An idiomatic expression of the form bene (peius) mereri de + ablative, meaning 'to deserve well (worse) of, to benefit (harm) someone'. Here it means that they do the worst possible disservice to all mortals.

  4. 108.37eripienda sunt vento vela

    A passive periphrastic (gerundive) construction with eripere, taking the dative (or ablative) of separation vento and the accusative (here subject) vela. Meaning 'sails must be snatched from the wind,' it metaphorically describes the desperate task of furling or stripping the sails against the wind's power during a storm.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:108.29-108.39