← Livy

History of Rome

§25.18.1-25.18.15

Single Combat of Crispinus and Badius

After the consuls suffer a defeat in Campania, a single combat takes place between the Roman Crispinus and the Campanian Badius, in which Crispinus wins, boosting the Roman morale.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§25.18.1

​consules agrum Campanum ingressi cum passim popularentur, eruptione oppidanorum et Magonis cum equitatu territi et trepidi ad signa milites palatos passim revocarunt et vixdum instructa acie fusi supra mille et quingentos milites amiserunt.

​The consuls, having entered the Campanian territory, while they were plundering far and wide, were terrified and thrown into confusion by a sally of the townsmen and Mago with his cavalry; they recalled the soldiers, who were scattered here and there, to their standards, and, being routed when the line was scarcely formed, they lost more than fifteen hundred soldiers.

§25.18.2

​inde ingens ferocia superbae suopte ingenio genti crevit, multisque proeliis lacessebant Romanos; sed intentiores ad cavendum consules una pugna fecerat incaute atque inconsulte inita.1

​From this, immense insolence grew in that nation, proud by its own nature, and they provoked the Romans in many battles; but one battle, entered into carelessly and inconsiderately, had made the consuls more intent on being on their guard.

§25.18.3

​restituit tamen his animos et illis minuit audaciam parva una res; sed in bello nihil tam leve est, quod non magnae interdum rei momentum faciat.

​However, one small incident restored courage to the former and diminished boldness in the latter; but in war nothing is so trifling that it does not sometimes make the momentum of a great event.

§25.18.4

​T. Quinctio Crispino Badius Campanus hospes erat, perfamiliari hospitio iunctus. creverat consuetudo, quod aeger Romae apud Crispinum Badius ante defectionem Campanam liberaliter comiterque curatus fuerat.

​Titus Quinctius Crispinus had a Campanian guest-friend, Badius, bound to him by a very familiar hospitality. Their intimacy had grown because, before the Campanian defection, Badius, when ill at Rome, had been generously and kindly cared for at the house of Crispinus.

§25.18.5

​is tum Badius progressus ante stationes, quae pro porta stabant, vocari Crispinum iussit. quod ubi est Crispino nuntiatum, ratus conloquium amicum ac familiare quaeri, manente memoria etiam in discidio publicorum foederum privati iuris, paulum a ceteris processit.

​This Badius then, having advanced before the outposts which stood in front of the gate, ordered Crispinus to be called. When this was announced to Crispinus, thinking that a friendly and familiar conversation was sought, since the memory of private right remained even in the rupture of public treaties, he advanced a little from the rest.

§25.18.6

​postquam in conspectum venere, “provoco te” inquit “ad pugnam, Crispine,” Badius; “conscendamus equos summotisque aliis, uter bello melior sit, decernamus.”

​After they came into view, Badius said, “I challenge you to a fight, Crispinus; let us mount our horses and, with all others removed, let us decide which of us is better in war.”

§25.18.7

​ad ea Crispinus nec sibi nec illi ait hostes deesse, in quibus virtutem ostendant: se, etiamsi in acie occurrerit, declinaturum, ne hospitali caede dextram violet;

​To this Crispinus replied that neither for himself nor for the other were enemies lacking in whom they might display their valor; and that he, even if he should meet him in battle, would turn aside, lest he should stain his right hand with the blood of a guest-friend;

§25.18.8

​conversusque abibat. enimvero ferocius tum Campanus increpare mollitiam ignaviamque et se digna probra in insontem iacere, hospitalem hostem appellans simulantemque parcere, cui sciat parem se non esse.2

​and turning away, he was departing. But indeed, the Campanian then more fiercely taunted him with softness and cowardice, and cast insults worthy of himself upon the innocent man, calling him a guest-friend enemy and pretending to spare one whom he knew to be no match for him.

§25.18.9

​si parum publicis foederibus ruptis dirempta simul et privata iura esse putet, Badium Campanum T. Quinctio Crispino Romano palam duobus exercitibus audientibus renuntiare hospitium.

​If he thought that by the breaking of public treaties private rights were not sufficiently dissolved at the same time, Badius the Campanian openly, in the hearing of both armies, renounced his guest-friendship with Titus Quinctius Crispinus the Roman.

§25.18.10

​nihil sibi cum eo consociatum, nihil foederatum hosti cum hoste, cuius patriam ac penates publicos privatosque oppugnatum venisset.

​There was nothing associated, nothing allied between him and that man, an enemy with an enemy, whose country and public and private household gods he had come to attack.

§25.18.11

​si vir esset, congrederetur. diu cunctantem Crispinum perpulere turmales, ne inpune insultare Campanum pateretur;

​If he were a man, let him engage. The cavalry of his troop persuaded Crispinus, who had hesitated for a long time, not to allow the Campanian to insult him with impunity;

§25.18.12

​itaque tantum moratus, dum imperatores consuleret, permitterentne sibi extra ordinem in provocantem hostem pugnare, permissu eorum arma cepit equumque conscendit et Badium nomine compellans ad pugnam evocavit.

​and so, having delayed only so long as to consult the generals whether they would permit him to fight outside the ranks against a challenging enemy, with their permission he took up his arms, mounted his horse, and calling Badius by name, challenged him to battle.

§25.18.13

​nulla mora a Campano facta est; infestis equis concurrerunt. Crispinus supra scutum sinistrum umerum Badio hasta transfixit superque delapsum cum vulnere ex equo desiluit,3 ut pedes iacentem conficeret.

​No delay was made by the Campanian; they rushed together with hostile horses. Crispinus transfixed Badius with his spear in the left shoulder above his shield, and as he fell wounded, he leaped down from his horse to dispatch him on foot as he lay.

§25.18.14

​Badius, priusquam opprimeretur, parma atque equo relicto ad suos aufugit;

​Badius, before he could be overpowered, leaving his buckler and horse, fled to his own men;

§25.18.15

​Crispinus equum armaque capta et cruentam cuspidem insignis spoliis ostentans cum magna laude et gratulatione militum ad consules est deductus laudatusque ibi magnifice et donis donatus.

​Crispinus, displaying the captured horse and arms and the bloody spearhead as distinguished spoils, was conducted to the consuls with great praise and congratulations of the soldiers, and was there magnificently praised and presented with gifts.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 25.18.2intentiores ad cavendum consules una pugna fecerat incaute atque inconsulte inita

    An inverted structure where the subject 'una pugna' (modified by the participle phrase 'incaute atque inconsulte inita') is placed after the verb 'fecerat', while the object 'consules' is placed before it. 'intentiores' is the predicate adjective modifying 'consules', which in turn is modified by 'ad cavendum'.

  2. 25.18.8simulantemque parcere, cui sciat parem se non esse

    An indirect speech construction. 'cui' is a relative pronoun in the dative governed by 'parcere' (referring to Badius). 'sciat' is subjunctive as it is a subordinate clause in indirect discourse. 'se' is the subject of the infinitive clause representing Badius (the speaker), with 'parem' as its predicate. It expresses the accusation: 'pretending to spare one [Badius] whom he [Crispinus] knows he [Badius] is no match for.'

  3. 25.18.13superque delapsum cum vulnere ex equo desiluit

    Here 'super' functions as a preposition governing the accusative 'delapsum', meaning 'upon the fallen one [Badius]'. 'cum vulnere' modifies 'delapsum', indicating the state of the opponent ('wounded'), since taking it with 'desiluit' would mean Crispinus himself was wounded, which contradicts the context.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25) · Revision history (2, latest 2026-09-22)
  • 2026-09-22 AI review — source 1
  • 2026-09-21 AI review — source 1
urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:25.18.1-25.18.15