← Appian

Samnite History

§I-III

Mutiny at Capua and Manlius Torquatus

This chunk describes the mutiny of Roman garrison soldiers in Capua, resolved peacefully through the cancellation of their debts, followed by the anecdote of Manlius Torquatus who coerced a tribune to save his father, and the beginning of his single combat.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§I

" ὅτι οἱ Ῥωμαίων στρατηγοὶ Κορνήλιος καὶ Κορουῖνος, καὶ Δέκιος δημότης, Σαυνίτας νικήσαντες ὑπέλιπον Καμπανοῖς φύλακας πρὸς τὰς Σαυνιτῶν ἐπιδρομάς. οἱ δὲ φύλακες οἵδε Καμπανοῖς ἁβροδιαίτοις καὶ πολυτελέσιν οὖσι κοινωνοῦντες ἐφθείροντο τὰς γνώμας, καὶ ἐφθόνουν ὧν ἔχουσιν ἀγαθῶν,1 αὐτοὶ πενόμενοι καὶ τὰ χρέα δεδιότες τὰ ἐν Ῥώμῃ. τέλος δὲ ἐπεβούλευον τοὺς ξένους ἑαυτῶν ἀνελόντες ἕκαστοι τὴν περιουσίαν κατασχεῖν καὶ τὰς γυναῖκας ἐς γάμον προσαγαγέσθαι. καὶ τάχα ἂν ἔπραξαν αἰσχρὸν οὕτω μύσος, εἰ μὴ Μάμερκος, ἕτερος Ῥωμαίων στρατηγός, ἐπὶ Σαυνίτας ὁδεύων ἔμαθε2 τὸ βούλευμα τῶν φυλάκων, καὶ ἐπικρύψας τοὺς μὲν αὐτῶν ἐξώπλισε καὶ ἀφῆκεν οἷα κεκμηκότας, τοὺς δὲ πονηροτέρους ἐκέλευσεν ἐς Ῥώμην ἐπί τινα χρείαν ἐπείγεσθαι, χιλίαρχόν τε αὐτοῖς συνέπεμψεν, ᾧ εἴρητο ἀφανῶς αὐτοὺς φυλάσσειν. ἑκάτεροι δʼ ὑπώπτευον μεμηνῦσθαι, καὶ περὶ Ταρρακίνην ἀφίστανταί τε τοῦ χιλιάρχου, καὶ τοὺς ἐπὶ τῶν ἔργων ἐν τοῖς ἀγροῖς δεδεμένους ἐκλύσαντες, καὶ ὁπλίσαντες ὡς ἐδύναντο, ἤλαυνον ἐς Ῥώμην ὁμοῦ δισμύριοι γεγονότες. ἔτι δʼ αὐτῶν ὁδὸν ἡμέρας μιᾶς ἀπεχόντων ὑπήντα Κορουῖνος, καὶ παραστρατοπεδεύσας ἐν τοῖς ὄρεσι τοῖς Ἀλβανῶν ἠρεμεί, περισκοπῶν τε τὸ ἔργον ἔτι, καὶ μέγα ἡγούμενος ἀπεγνωκόσι μάχεσθαι. οἱ δὲ ἐπεμίγνυντο ἀλλήλοις κρύφα, καὶ ὀδυρμοὶ καὶ δάκρυα τῶν φυλάκων ἦν ὡς ἐν οἰκείοις καὶ φίλοις ἁμαρτεῖν μὲν ὁμολογούντων, τὴν δὲ αἰτίαν ἐς τὰ χρέα φερόντων τὰ ἐν Ῥώμῃ. ὧν ὁ Κορουῖνος αἰσθανόμενος, καὶ ὀκνῶν ἅψασθαι πολιτικοῦ καὶ τοσούτου φόνου, συνεβούλευσε τῇ βουλῇ τὰ χρέα τοῖς ἀνδράσι μεθεῖναι, τόν τε πόλεμον ἐξαίρων ἐπὶ μέγα, εἰ τοσῶνδε ἀνδρῶν δύναιτο κρατῆσαι μαχομένων ἐξ ἀπογνώσεως, καὶ τὰς συνόδους αὐτῶν καὶ ἐπιμιξίας ἐν ὑπονοίᾳ τιθέμενος, μὴ οὐδʼ ὁ ἴδιος αὐτῷ στρατὸς ἐς πάντα ᾖ πιστός,3 ἅτε συγγενεῖς ὄντες ἐκείνων, καὶ οὐχ ἧσσον αὐτῶν αἰτιώμενοι τὰ χρέα. σφαλέντα δὲ κινδυνεύσειν ἔφη περὶ μειζόνων· καὶ τὴν νίκην, εἰ κρατήσειεν, ἀτυχεστάτην ἔσεσθαι τῇ πόλει κατʼ οἰκείων τοσῶνδε. οἷς ἡ βουλὴ πεισθεῖσα τὰς μὲν τῶν χρεῶν ἀποκοπὰς ἐψηφίσατο πᾶσι Ῥωμαίοις, τοῖς δὲ τότε ἐχθροῖς καὶ ἄδειαν. οἱ μὲν δὴ τὰ ὅπλα ἀποθέμενοι κατῄεσαν ἐς τὴν πόλιν."

” That the Roman generals Cornelius and Corvinus, and Decius, a man of the people, having defeated the Samnites, left guards for the Campanians against the incursions of the Samnites. But these guards, associating with the luxurious and extravagant Campanians, began to corrupt their minds, and envied the good things they possessed, being themselves poor and fearing their debts in Rome. Finally, they plotted to kill their hosts and, each for himself, to seize their property and take their wives in marriage. And they would have quickly committed such a shameful crime, had not Mamercus, another Roman general, while marching against the Samnites, learned of the plot of the guards, and, keeping it secret, disarmed and discharged some of them as if they were exhausted, while ordering the more troublesome ones to hasten to Rome for some service, and sending a tribune with them, who had been instructed to watch them secretly. But both groups suspected that they had been betrayed, and near Terracina they revolted against the tribune, and, having released those who were bound in labor in the fields and having armed them as best they could, they marched on Rome, having become twenty thousand in all. When they were still one day’s journey away, Corvinus met them, and, having encamped in the Alban hills, he remained quiet, still watching the course of events and considering it a grave matter to fight against desperate men. But they mingled with one another secretly, and there were lamentations and tears from the guards as among relatives and friends, while they confessed their fault on the one hand, but attributed the cause to their debts in Rome on the other. Corvinus, perceiving this, and hesitating to engage in civil slaughter of such magnitude, advised the Senate to remit the debts of the men, both magnifying the war, if he should have to overcome so many men fighting from desperation, and viewing their meetings and intercourse with suspicion, fearing that not even his own army would be faithful to him in all things, since they were relatives of those men and blamed their debts no less than they did. He said that if he failed, he would run a risk concerning greater matters, and that the victory, if he should win, would be most unfortunate for the city against so many of its own citizens. Persuaded by these arguments, the Senate voted a cancellation of debts for all Romans, and amnesty for those who were then enemies. So, laying down their weapons, they went down to the city.”

§II

"ὅτι Μάλλιος Τορκουάτος ὁ ὕπατος τοιοῦτος ἦν τὴν ἀρετήν. τούτῳ πατὴρ ἐγεγένητο μικρολόγος καὶ ἀμελὴς ἐς αὐτόν. καὶ ἐν ἀγροῖς αὐτὸν εἶχε, μετὰ τῶν θεραπόντων ἐργαζόμενόν τε καὶ τρεφόμενον. γραψαμένου δὲ αὐτὸν ἐπὶ πολλοῖς ἀδικήμασι Πομπωνίου δημάρχου, καὶ μέλλοντος ἐρεῖν τι καὶ περὶ τῆς ἐς τὸν παῖδα κακώσεως, ὁ παῖς ὅδε Μάλλιος ἧκεν, ἐπικρύπτων ξιφίδιον, ἐς τὴν οἰκίαν τοῦ δημάρχου, καὶ τυχεῖν ἠξίωσεν αὐτοῦ μόνου ὡς δή τι λέξων χρήσιμον ἐς τὴν δίκην. ὑποδεχθεὶς δὲ καὶ λέγειν ἀρχόμενος ἐπέκλεισε τὰς θύρας, καὶ τὸ ξίφος ἐπισπάσας ἠπείλει τῷ δημάρχῳ κτενεῖν αὐτόν, εἰ μὴ ὀμόσειεν ὅτι λύσει τῷ πατρὶ τὴν δίκην. καὶ ὁ μὲν ὤμοσε καὶ διέλυσεν, ἐκθέμενος τῷ δήμῳ τὸ συμβάν· ὁ δὲ Μάλλιος ἐξ ἐκείνου λαμπρὸς ἦν, ἐπαινούμενος ὅτι τοιόσδε ἐς τοιόνδε4 πατέρα ἐγεγένητο."

”That the consul Manlius Torquatus was of such character in respect of virtue. He had a father who was parsimonious and negligent towards him, and kept him in the fields, working and living with the slaves. When the tribune Pomponius prosecuted him for many misdeeds, and was about to speak also concerning the maltreatment of his son, this son Manlius came, concealing a small dagger, to the house of the tribune, and requested to meet him alone as if to say something useful for the trial. Having been received and beginning to speak, he locked the doors, and, drawing his dagger, threatened to kill the tribune unless he swore to drop the lawsuit against his father. And the tribune swore and dropped it, setting forth what had happened to the people. Manlius was illustrious from that time on, being praised because he had proven to be such a son toward such a father.”

§III

"ὁ δὲ αὐτὸν εἰς μονομαχίαν προυκαλεῖτο, σκώπτων ἐς αὐτόν. ὁ δὲ τέως μὲν αὑτοῦ κατεῖχε, μετὰ δέ, οὐ φέρων ἔτι τὸ ἐρέθισμα, ἀντήλασε τὸν ἵππον."

”But he challenged him to single combat, mocking him. He restrained himself for a time, but later, no longer bearing the provocation, he rode his horse against him.”

Syntax notes4 items
  1. Iὧν ἔχουσιν ἀγαθῶν

    The relative pronoun ὧν is attracted (assimilated) to the genitive case of its antecedent ἀγαθῶν (instead of being accusative as the object of ἔχουσιν), influenced also by the verb φθονέω which governs the genitive case.

  2. Iκαὶ τάχα ἂν ἔπραξαν ... εἰ μὴ ... ἔμαθε

    A past contrary-to-fact conditional sentence, using the past indicative with ἄν in the apodosis (ἂν ἔπραξαν, "they would have done") and εἰ with the past indicative in the protasis (εἰ μὴ ... ἔμαθε, "had not Mamercus learned").

  3. Iμὴ οὐδʼ ὁ ἴδιος αὐτῷ στρατὸς ἐς πάντα ᾖ πιστός

    A clause of fearing/suspicion introduced by ἐν ὑπονοίᾳ τιθέμενος (suspecting, fearing) followed by μή and the subjunctive ᾖ. The addition of οὐδέ ("not even") creates a negative apprehension: "fearing that not even his own army would be faithful."

  4. IIτοιόσδε ἐς τοιόνδε

    A juxtaposition of demonstrative pronouns creating a sharp contrast, meaning "such a (devoted) son towards such a (negligent) father."

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0551.tlg004.humanitext-grc2:I-III