← Pausanias

Description of Greece

§7.17.1-7.17.7

Decline of Greece and History of Dyme

Pausanias reviews the historical decline of Greece, including Nero's temporary liberation and Vespasian's subsequent subjugation. He then describes the boundary of Achaea near Dyme, explaining its historical context and the ancient names of the city mentioned in an inscription for the Olympic victor Oebotas.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§7.17.1

ἐς ἅπαν δὲ ἀσθενείας τότε μάλιστα κατῆλθεν ἡ Ἑλλάς, λυμανθεῖσα κατὰ μέρη καὶ διαπορθηθεῖσα ἐξ ἀρχῆς ὑπὸ τοῦ δαίμονος. Ἄργος μέν, ἐς πλεῖστον ἀφικομένην δυνάμεως πόλιν1 ἐπὶ τῶν καλουμένων ἡρώων, ὁμοῦ τῇ μεταβολῇ τῇ ἐς Δωριέας ἐπέλιπε τὸ ἐκ τῆς τύχης εὐμενές·

​At that time Greece fell into the ultimate state of weakness, having been ruined in parts and utterly devastated from the beginning by fortune. Argos, a city that had reached the highest point of power in the era of the so-called heroes, lost the favor of fortune simultaneously with the transition to the Dorians;

§7.17.2

τὸ δὲ ἔθνος τὸ Ἀττικόν, ἀπὸ τοῦ Πελοποννησίων πολέμου καὶ νόσου τῆς λοιμώδους ἀνενεγκόν τε καὶ αὖθις ἀνανηξάμενον, ἔτεσιν ἔμελλεν οὐ πολλοῖς ὕστερον ἡ Μακεδόνων ἀκμὴ καθαιρήσειν· κατέσκηψε δὲ ἐκ Μακεδονίας καὶ ἐς τὰς Βοιωτίας Θήβας τὸ Ἀλεξάνδρου μήνιμα. Λακεδαιμονίοις δὲ Ἐπαμινώνδας ὁ Θηβαῖος καὶ αὖθις ὁ Ἀχαιῶν πόλεμος ἐγένετο· ὅτε δὲ καὶ μόγις, ἅτε ἐκ δένδρου λελωβημένου καὶ αὔου τὰ πλείονα,2 ἀνεβλάστησεν ἐκ τῆς Ἑλλάδος τὸ Ἀχαϊκόν, καὶ αὐτὸ ἡ κακία τῶν στρατηγησάντων ἐκόλουσεν ἔτι αὐξανόμενον.

​and the Attic nation, though it had recovered and raised itself up again after the Peloponnesian War and the plague, was destined not many years later to be cast down by the peak of Macedonian power; and the anger of Alexander fell from Macedonia upon Boeotian Thebes. For the Lacedaemonians, Epaminondas the Theban was their ruin, and later the war with the Achaeans; and when, with difficulty, as if from a tree maimed and mostly withered, the Achaean League sprouted again from Greece, the wickedness of its generals cut it down while it was still growing.

§7.17.3

χρόνῳ δὲ ὕστερον ἐς Νέρωνα ἡ βασιλεία περιῆλθεν ἡ Ῥωμαίων, καὶ ἐλεύθερον ὁ Νέρων ἀφίησιν ἁπάντων, ἀλλαγὴν πρὸς δῆμον ποιησάμενος τὸν Ῥωμαίων· Σαρδὼ γὰρ τὴν νῆσον ἐς τὰ μάλιστα εὐδαίμονα ἀντὶ Ἑλλάδος σφίσιν ἀντέδωκεν. ἀπιδόντι οὖν ἐς τοῦτό μοι τοῦ Νέρωνος τὸ ἔργον ὀρθότατα εἰρηκέναι Πλάτων ἐφαίνετο ὁ Ἀρίστωνος, ὁπόσα ἀδικήματα μεγέθει καὶ τολμήματί ἐστιν ὑπερηρκότα, οὐ τῶν ἐπιτυχόντων εἶναι ταῦτα ἀνθρώπων,3 ψυχῆς δὲ γενναίας ὑπὸ ἀτόπου παιδείας διεφθαρμένης.

​In later times the Roman sovereignty devolved upon Nero, and Nero set all of Greece free, making an exchange with the Roman people; for he gave them in return for Greece the island of Sardinia, which was especially prosperous. Looking therefore at this act of Nero, Plato the son of Ariston seemed to me to have spoken most correctly, that all wrongdoings that surpass in size and audacity belong not to ordinary men, but to a noble soul corrupted by an improper education.

§7.17.4

οὐ μὴν Ἕλλησί γε ἐξεγένετο ὄνασθαι τοῦ δώρου· Οὐεσπασιανοῦ γὰρ μετὰ Νέρωνα ἄρξαντος ἐς ἐμφύλιον στάσιν προήχθησαν, καὶ σφᾶς ὑποτελεῖς τε αὖθις ὁ Οὐεσπασιανὸς εἶναι φόρων καὶ ἀκούειν ἐκέλευσεν ἡγεμόνος, ἀπομεμαθηκέναι φήσας τὴν ἐλευθερίαν τὸ Ἑλληνικόν.

​Yet the Greeks were not permitted to enjoy the gift; for when Vespasian ruled after Nero, they were led into civil strife, and Vespasian ordered them to be taxpayers again and to obey a governor, saying that the Greek nation had unlearned freedom.

§7.17.5

τάδε μὲν οὕτω συμβάντα εὕρισκον· Ἀχαιοῖς δὲ ὅροι καὶ Ἠλείοις τῆς χώρας ποταμός τε Λάρισος καὶ Ἀθηνᾶς ἐπὶ τῷ ποταμῷ ναός ἐστι Λαρισαίας, καὶ Ἀχαιῶν πόλις Δύμη σταδίους ὅσον τε τριάκοντα ἀπέχει τοῦ Λαρίσου. ταύτην Φίλιππος ὁ Δημητρίου πολεμῶν μόνην τῶν Ἀχαϊκῶν ἔσχεν ὑπήκοον, καὶ ἐπὶ τῇ αἰτίᾳ ταύτῃ Σουλπίκιος, ἡγεμὼν καὶ οὗτος Ῥωμαίων, ἐπέτρεψε τῇ στρατιᾷ διαρπάσαι τὴν Δύμην· Αὔγουστος δὲ ὕστερον καὶ προσένειμεν αὐτὴν Πατρεῦσιν.

​These things I found to have happened thus. The boundary of the territory between the Achaeans and the Eleans is the river Larisus and the temple of Larisaean Athena upon the river, and the Achaean city Dyme is about thirty stades distant from the Larisus. Philip the son of Demetrius, when waging war, had this city alone of the Achaean cities subject to him, and for this reason Sulpicius, who was also a Roman general, permitted his army to plunder Dyme; and Augustus later assigned it to the Patraeans.

§7.17.6

ἐκαλεῖτο δὲ τὰ μὲν ἀρχαιότερα Πάλεια· ἐχόντων δὲ ἔτι Ἰώνων ὄνομά οἱ μετέθεντο τὸ ἐφʼ ἡμῶν, σαφῶς δὲ οὐκ οἶδα εἴτε ἀπὸ γυναικὸς ἐπιχωρίας Δύμης εἴτε ἀπὸ Δύμαντος τοῦ Αἰγιμίου. ὑπὸ δὲ τοῦ ἐλεγείου τοῦ Ὀλυμπίασιν ἐπὶ τῇ εἰκόνι τῇ Οἰβώτα οὐ προαχθείη ἄν τις4 ἐς ἀλογίαν. Οἰβώτᾳ γὰρ ἀνδρὶ Δυμαίῳ, σταδίου μὲν ἀνελομένῳ νίκην Ὀλυμπιάδι ἕκτῃ, εἰκόνος δὲ ἐν Ὀλυμπίᾳ περὶ τὴν ὀγδοηκοστὴν Ὀλυμπιάδα κατὰ μάντευμα ἐκ Δελφῶν ἀξιωθέντι, ἐπίγραμμά ἐστιν ἐπʼ αὐτῷ λέγον·

​It was called Paleia in older times; but while the Ionians still possessed it, they changed its name to the present one, though I do not know for certain whether it was from a native woman Dyme, or from Dymas the son of Aegimius. One would not be led into confusion by the elegiac inscription at Olympia upon the statue of Oebotas; for for Oebotas, a man of Dyme who won the victory in the stade in the sixth Olympiad, and was deemed worthy of a statue at Olympia around the eightieth Olympiad according to an oracle from Delphi, there is an inscription on it saying:

§7.17.7

" Οἰνία Οἰβώτας στάδιον νικῶν ὅδʼ Ἁχαιὸς πατρίδα Πάλειαν θῆκʼ ὀνομαστοτέραν." τοῦτο οὖν οὐκ ἄν τινι ἀλογίαν παραστήσειεν, εἰ Πάλειαν ἀλλὰ μὴ Δύμην τὸ ἐπίγραμμα καλεῖ τὴν πόλιν· τὰ γὰρ ἀρχαιότερα ὀνόματα ἐς ποίησιν ἐπάγεσθαι τῶν ὑστέρων5 καθεστηκός ἐστιν Ἕλλησι, καὶ Ἀμφιάραόν τε καὶ Ἄδραστον Φορωνείδας καὶ Ἐρεχθείδην ἐπονομάζουσι τὸν Θησέα.

” This Achaean, Oebotas son of Oenias, winning the stade, made his homeland Paleia more famous.” This, therefore, would not cause anyone confusion, if the inscription calls the city Paleia and not Dyme; for it is established among the Greeks to introduce older names into poetry instead of later ones, and they call Amphiaraus and Adrastus descendants of Phoroneus, and Theseus a descendant of Erechtheus.

Syntax notes5 items
  1. 7.17.1ἐς πλεῖστον ἀφικομένην δυνάμεως πόλιν

    An appositive to Ἄργος, which serves as the direct object of the verb ἐπέλιπε (abandoned, left). The grammatical subject of the clause is the subsequent phrase τὸ ἐκ τῆς τύχης εὐμενές (the favor of fortune).

  2. 7.17.2αὔου τὰ πλείονα

    The phrase τὰ πλείονα (for the most part) is an accusative of respect (or adverbial accusative) modifying the adjective αὔου (withered, dry), meaning 'a tree withered for the most part.'

  3. 7.17.3οὐ τῶν ἐπιτυχόντων εἶναι ταῦτα ἀνθρώπων

    An accusative-with-infinitive construction quoting Plato. The subject of the infinitive εἶναι is the demonstrative pronoun ταῦτα (these great wrongs), and the genitives τῶν ἐπιτυχόντων ... ἀνθρώπων and ψυχῆς ... are genitives of possession or characteristic ('belong to...', 'are the characteristic of...').

  4. 7.17.6οὐ προαχθείη ἄν τις

    A potential optative with ἄν, expressing possibility or likelihood ('one would not be led into...', 'no one should be driven to...').

  5. 7.17.7τῶν ὑστέρων

    A genitive of separation or comparison/substitution dependent on the infinitive ἐπάγεσθαι (to introduce), meaning 'instead of the later names' or 'in preference to the later names'.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0525.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:7.17.1-7.17.7