← Pausanias

Description of Greece

§7.16.1-7.16.5

Defeat of the Achaeans at the Isthmus and Flight of Diaeus

The Roman army under the consul Mummius arrives at the Isthmus and engages in a decisive battle with the Achaeans. Although the Achaeans initially defeated the Roman vanguard, they suffered a crushing defeat in the main battle due to the immediate rout of their cavalry and a flank attack, after which Diaeus fled without defending Corinth.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§7.16.1

Μόμμιος δὲ Ὀρέστην ἅμα ἀγόμενος, τὸν πρότερον ἐπὶ τῇ Λακεδαιμονίων διαφορᾷ καὶ Ἀχαιῶν ἐλθόντα, ἀφίκετο μὲν περὶ ὄρθρον ἐς τὸ τῶν Ῥωμαίων στράτευμα, ἀποπέμψας δὲ ἐς Μακεδονίαν Μέτελλον καὶ ὅσον εἵπετο ἐκείνῳ, ἀνέμενεν αὐτὸς ἐν τῷ ἰσθμῷ τὴν πᾶσαν ἀθροισθῆναι παρασκευήν. ἀφίκετο δὲ ἱππικὸν μὲν πεντακόσιοί τε καὶ τρισχίλιοι, τοῦ πεζοῦ δὲ ἀριθμὸς ἐγένετο ἐς μυριάδας δύο προσόντων καὶ τούτοις τρισχιλίων· ἐπῆλθον δὲ καὶ τοξόται Κρῆτες καὶ ἐκ Περγάμου τῆς ὑπὲρ Καΐκου Φιλοποίμην στρατιώτας ἄγων παρὰ Ἀττάλου.

​Mummius, bringing with him Orestes, who had previously come on account of the dispute between the Lacedaemonians and the Achaeans, arrived at the Roman army about dawn; and having sent Metellus and those who followed him back to Macedonia, he himself waited at the Isthmus for the entire preparation to be assembled. There arrived three thousand five hundred cavalry, and the number of infantry became twenty-three thousand; there also came Cretan archers and, from Pergamos above the Caicus, Philopoemen bringing soldiers from Attalus.

§7.16.2

Μόμμιος μὲν δὴ τῶν τε ἐξ Ἰταλίας τινὰς καὶ τὰ ἐπικουρικὰ ἀπωτέρω δύο τε καὶ δέκα ἔταξε σταδίοις, πρὸ τοῦ παντὸς εἶναι στρατεύματος φυλακήν· Ἀχαιοὶ δέ, ἐχόντων ἀφυλακτότερον ὑπὸ φρονήματος τῶν Ῥωμαίων,1 ἐπιτίθενται ἐπὶ φυλακῆς αὐτοῖς τῆς πρώτης, καὶ τοὺς μὲν φονεύουσι, πλείονας δὲ ἔτι ἐς τὸ στρατόπεδον κατεῖρξαν, καὶ ἀσπίδας ὅσον τε πεντακοσίας εἷλον. ἀπὸ τούτου δὲ τοῦ ἔργου καὶ ἐπήρθησαν οἱ Ἀχαιοὶ ποιήσασθαι τὴν ἔξοδον πρότερον πρὶν ἢ Ῥωμαίους ἄρχειν μάχης·

​Mummius indeed stationed some of those from Italy and the auxiliary troops twelve stades away, to be a guard in front of the whole army. But the Achaeans, since the Romans were keeping guard rather carelessly out of pride, attacked this first guard of theirs, and killed some, and shut up still more into their camp, and took about five hundred shields. And by this exploit the Achaeans were encouraged to make their sally before the Romans should begin the battle.

§7.16.3

ὡς δὲ ἀντεπῆγε καὶ ὁ Μόμμιος, οἱ μὲν ἐς τὸ ἱππικὸν τῶν Ἀχαιῶν ταχθέντες αὐτίκα ᾤχοντο φεύγοντες, τῆς Ῥωμαίων ἵππου μηδὲ τὴν πρώτην ἔφοδον ὑπομείναντες· ὁ δὲ πεζὸς στρατὸς ἀθύμως μὲν εἶχεν ἐπὶ τῶν ἱππέων τῇ τροπῇ, δεξάμενοι δὲ τὴν ἐμβολὴν τοῦ ὁπλιτικοῦ τοῦ Ῥωμαίων βιαζόμενοί τε τῷ πλήθει καὶ ἀπαγορεύοντες τοῖς τραύμασιν ὅμως ἀντεῖχον ὑπὸ τοῦ θυμοῦ, πρίν γε δὴ Ῥωμαίων λογάδες χίλιοι προσπεσόντες κατὰ τὰ πλάγια ἐς τελέαν τοὺς Ἀχαιοὺς φυγὴν κατέστησαν.2

​But when Mummius also advanced against them, those of the Achaeans who had been stationed in the cavalry immediately fled, not even awaiting the first charge of the Roman horse. The infantry force was discouraged by the rout of the cavalry, but having received the charge of the Roman hoplites, although hard pressed by numbers and failing from their wounds, they nevertheless held out with spirit, until indeed a thousand chosen Romans fell upon them from the flanks and turned the Achaeans into headlong rout.

§7.16.4

εἰ δὲ ἐτόλμησεν ἐσδραμεῖν μετὰ τὴν μάχην Δίαιος ἐς Κόρινθον καὶ ὑποδέξασθαι τῷ τείχει τοὺς διαπίπτοντας ἐκ τῆς φυγῆς, κἂν εὕρασθαί τι παρὰ Μομμίου οἱ Ἀχαιοὶ φιλάνθρωπον ἐδυνήθησαν,3 ἐς πολιορκίαν καὶ τριβὴν πολέμου καταστάντες· νῦν δὲ ἀρχομένων ἔτι ἐνδιδόναι τῶν Ἀχαιῶν εὐθὺ Μεγάλης πόλεως ἔφευγεν ὁ Δίαιος, οὐδέν τι γενόμενος ἐς Ἀχαιοὺς ὅμοιος ἢ καὶ Καλλίστρατος ὁ Ἐμπέδου πρὸς Ἀθηναίους.

​And if Diaeus had dared to run into Corinth after the battle and to receive within the wall those who were escaping from the flight, the Achaeans might even have obtained some favor from Mummius by entering upon a siege and a protraction of the war; but as it was, while the Achaeans were still beginning to give way, Diaeus fled straight for Megalopolis, behaving in no way toward the Achaeans as Callistratus the son of Empedus did toward the Athenians.

§7.16.5

τούτῳ γὰρ τῷ ἀνδρὶ ἱππαρχήσαντι ἐν Σικελίᾳ, ὅτε Ἀθηναῖοι καὶ ὅσοι ἄλλοι τοῦ στόλου μετεσχήκεσαν ἀπώλλυντο πρὸς τῷ ποταμῷ τῷ Ἀσινάρῳ, τούτῳ τότε τῷ Καλλιστράτῳ παρέστη τόλμα διεκπαῖσαι διὰ τῶν πολεμίων ἄγοντι τοὺς ἱππέας· ὡς δὲ τὸ πολὺ ἀπέσωσεν αὐτῶν ἐς Κατάνην, ἀνέστρεφεν ὀπίσω τὴν αὐτὴν αὖθις ὁδὸν ἐς Συρακούσας, διαρπάζοντας δὲ ἔτι εὑρὼν τὸ Ἀθηναίων στρατόπεδον καταβάλλει τε ὅσον πέντε ἐξ αὐτῶν, καὶ τραύματα ἐπίκαιρα αὐτὸς καὶ ὁ ἵππος λαβόντες ἀφιᾶσι τὴν ψυχήν.

​For to this man, who was cavalry commander in Sicily, when the Athenians and all the others who had shared in the expedition were being destroyed at the river Asinarus—to this Callistratus then came the courage to break through the enemy, leading his horsemen. And when he had saved most of them to Catana, he turned back again by the same road to Syracuse, and finding the Athenian camp still being plundered, he cut down about five of them, and having himself and his horse received mortal wounds, they yielded up their life.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 7.16.2ἐχόντων ἀφυλακτότερον ὑπὸ φρονήματος τῶν Ῥωμαίων

    Genitive absolute construction. The participle ἐχόντων is used intransitively with the comparative adverb ἀφυλακτότερον and its logical subject τῶν Ῥωμαίων, meaning 'since the Romans were keeping guard rather carelessly (out of pride).'

  2. 7.16.3πρίν γε δὴ Ῥωμαίων λογάδες χίλιοι προσπεσόντες κατὰ τὰ πλάγια ἐς τελέαν τοὺς Ἀχαιοὺς φυγὴν κατέστησαν

    The conjunction πρίν introduces a temporal clause with the indicative aorist (κατέστησαν) after an affirmative main clause (implying the negative 'they did not give way until'), denoting an actual historical event that occurred in the past ('until at last...').

  3. 7.16.4κἂν εὕρασθαί τι παρὰ Μομμίου οἱ Ἀχαιοὶ φιλάνθρωπον ἐδυνήθησαν

    The apodosis of a contrary-to-fact conditional sentence. While the particle ἄν is embedded in κἂν (καὶ ἄν) and syntactically goes with the infinitive εὕρασθαι, the past indicative of a verb of ability/possibility (ἐδυνήθησαν) can express a contrary-to-fact statement even without ἄν. Thus, the whole clause means 'the Achaeans might have been able to obtain...'

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0525.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:7.16.1-7.16.5