← Aristotle

Politics

§7.1330a

Division of Territory and the Ideal Site for the City

Aristotle discusses the distribution of territory in the ideal state, arguing that it should be divided into common and private lands, each further subdivided to ensure that all citizens share both near the frontiers and the city for equality and national defense, with slaves or barbarians as farmers. He also outlines the ideal site for the city, prioritizing health through environmental factors like wind direction.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§7.1330a

ἀλλὰ τῇ χρήσει φιλικῶς γινομένῃ κοινήν,1 οὔτʼ ἀπορεῖν οὐθένα τῶν πολιτῶν τροφῆς. περὶ συσσιτίων τε συνδοκεῖ πᾶσι χρήσιμον εἶναι ταῖς εὖ κατεσκευασμέναις πόλεσιν ὑπάρχειν· διʼ ἣν δʼ αἰτίαν συνδοκεῖ καὶ ἡμῖν, ὕστερον ἐροῦμεν. δεῖ δὲ τούτων κοινωνεῖν πάντας τοὺς πολίτας, οὐ ῥᾴδιον δὲ τοὺς ἀπόρους ἀπὸ τῶν ἰδίων τε εἰσφέρειν τὸ συντεταγμένον καὶ διοικεῖν τὴν ἄλλην οἰκίαν. ἔτι δὲ τὰ πρὸς τοὺς θεοὺς δαπανήματα κοινὰ πάσης τῆς πόλεώς ἐστιν. ἀναγκαῖον τοίνυν εἰς δύο μέρη διῃρῆσθαι τὴν χώραν, καὶ τὴν μὲν εἶναι κοινὴν τὴν δὲ τῶν ἰδιωτῶν, καὶ τούτων ἑκατέραν διῃρῆσθαι δίχα πάλιν, τῆς μὲν κοινῆς τὸ μὲν ἕτερον μέρος εἰς τὰς πρὸς τοὺς θεοὺς λειτουργίας τὸ δὲ ἕτερον εἰς τὴν τῶν συσσιτίων δαπάνην, τῆς δὲ τῶν ἰδιωτῶν τὸ ἕτερον μέρος τὸ πρὸς τὰς ἐσχατιάς, τὸ δὲ ἕτερον πρὸς πόλιν, ἵνα δύο κλήρων ἑκάστῳ νεμηθέντων2 ἀμφοτέρων τῶν τόπων πάντες μετέχωσιν. τό τε γὰρ ἴσον οὕτως ἔχει καὶ τὸ δίκαιον καὶ τὸ πρὸς τοὺς ἀστυγείτονας πολέμους ὁμονοητικώτερον. ὅπου γὰρ μὴ τοῦτον ἔχει τὸν τρόπον, οἱ μὲν ὀλιγωροῦσι τῆς πρὸς τοὺς ὁμόρους ἔχθρας, οἱ δὲ λίαν φροντίζουσι καὶ παρὰ τὸ καλόν. διὸ παρʼ ἐνίοις νόμος ἐστὶ τοὺς γειτνιῶντας τοῖς ὁμόροις μὴ συμμετέχειν βουλῆς τῶν πρὸς αὐτοὺς πολέμων, ὡς διὰ τὸ ἴδιον οὐκ ἂν δυναμένους βουλεύσασθαι καλῶς. τὴν μὲν οὖν χώραν ἀνάγκη διῃρῆσθαι τὸν τρόπον τοῦτον διὰ τὰς προειρημένας αἰτίας· τοὺς δὲ γεωργήσοντας3 μάλιστα μέν, εἰ δεῖ κατʼ εὐχήν, δούλους εἶναι, μήτε ὁμοφύλων πάντων μήτε θυμοειδῶν (οὕτω γὰρ ἂν πρός τε τὴν ἐργασίαν εἶεν χρήσιμοι καὶ πρὸς τὸ μηδὲν νεωτερίζειν ἀσφαλεῖς), δεύτερον δὲ βαρβάρους περιοίκους παραπλησίους τοῖς εἰρημένοις τὴν φύσιν, τούτων δὲ τοὺς μὲν ἐν τοῖς ἰδίοις εἶναι τῶν κεκτημένων τὰς οὐσίας, τοὺς δʼ ἐπὶ τῇ κοινῇ γῇ κοινούς. τίνα δὲ δεῖ τρόπον χρῆσθαι δούλοις, καὶ διότι βέλτιον πᾶσι τοῖς δούλοις ἆθλον προκεῖσθαι τὴν ἐλευθερίαν, ὕστερον ἐροῦμεν. τὴν δὲ πόλιν ὅτι μὲν δεῖ κοινὴν εἶναι τῆς ἠπείρου τε καὶ τῆς θαλάττης καὶ τῆς χώρας ἁπάσης ὁμοίως ἐκ τῶν ἐνδεχομένων, εἴρηται πρότερον· αὐτῆς δὲ προσάντη τὴν θέσιν εὔχεσθαι δεῖ κατατυγχάνειν πρὸς τέτταρα βλέποντας, πρῶτον μὲν ὡς ἀναγκαῖον πρὸς ὑγίειαν (αἵ τε γὰρ πρὸς ἕω τὴν ἔγκλισιν ἔχουσαι καὶ πρὸς τὰ πνεύματα τὰ πνέοντα ἀπὸ τῆς ἀνατολῆς ὑγιεινότεραι, δεύτερον δʼ αἱ κατὰ βορέαν· εὐχείμεροι γὰρ αὗται μᾶλλον)·

​but common in its use, which is made friendly, and that none of the citizens should be in want of food. Concerning common meals, all agree that it is useful for well-ordered states to have them; and for what reason it is agreed also by us, we will state later. All the citizens must share in these, but it is not easy for the needy to contribute the prescribed amount from their private property and at the same time to manage the rest of their household. Moreover, the expenses for the gods are common to the whole state. It is necessary, therefore, that the territory be divided into two parts, and that one part be common and the other belong to private individuals, and each of these two parts be divided again into two. Of the common land, one part should be for the services to the gods, and the other for the expenses of the common meals; of the private land, one part should be toward the frontiers, and the other toward the city, so that, two allotments being distributed to each, all may share in both locations. For this holds equality and justice, and a greater harmony in regard to wars with neighboring states. For where it is not this way, some disregard enmity with their neighbors, while others care too much and even contrary to what is noble. Wherefore in some states there is a law that those who neighbor the border should not join in the council concerning wars against them, on the ground that they cannot, because of their private interest, deliberate well. The territory, then, must be divided in this way for the aforementioned reasons; and those who are to farm it should, ideally, if we can choose, be slaves, neither all of the same race nor high-spirited (for thus they would be both useful for work and safe against making revolutions), and secondly, barbarian serfs of a nature similar to those mentioned. Of these, some should belong to private owners on their private estates, and others should be common on the common land. But in what way slaves ought to be treated, and why it is better to propose freedom as a prize to all slaves, we will state later. As for the city, that it ought to be common to both the mainland and the sea and the whole territory alike as far as possible, has been said before; but as for its actual site, we must pray to obtain a sloping position looking toward four things: first, as a necessity, toward health (for those that have their slope toward the east and toward the winds that blow from the sunrise are healthier, and secondly, those toward the north, for these are better in winter).

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 7.1330aἀλλὰ τῇ χρήσει φιλικῶς γινομένῃ κοινήν

    Following the preceding context stating that property should not be common (οὔτε κοινήν φαμεν εἶναι δεῖν τὴν κτῆσιν), the infinitive clause δεῖν εἶναι is understood. κοινήν is the accusative predicate complement to τὴν κτῆσιν. τῇ χρήσει is a dative of respect/manner, modified by the participle phrase φιλικῶς γινομένῃ, indicating that property should be common in its use through friendship.

  2. 7.1330aδύο κλήρων ἑκάστῳ νεμηθέντων

    A genitive absolute construction, where δύο κλήρων is the logical subject and the passive participle νεμηθέντων is the predicate. The dative ἑκάστῳ is a dative of advantage ('to each person'), explaining the system where two lots of land are allocated to every individual.

  3. 7.1330aτοὺς δὲ γεωργήσοντας

    The future active participle γεωργήσοντας with the article forms a substantived accusative phrase, meaning 'those who are to farm'. It functions as the subject accusative in the accusative-and-infinitive construction governed by the implicit δεῖ, leading to the infinitive phrase δούλους εἶναι.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg035.humanitext-grc2:7.1330a