- Source
- Aristotle. Aristotelis Politica. Ross, William David, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957 (printing).
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg035.humanitext-grc2:2.1264a
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-28
Aristotle argues that if Plato's communal system were truly beneficial, it would have been discovered over the course of history. He further criticizes Socrates for failing to define the property and family arrangements of the non-guardian classes, warning that this neglect will lead to a divided state and rebellious subjects.
δεῖ δὲ μηδὲ τοῦτο αὐτὸ ἀγνοεῖν, ὅτι χρὴ προσέχειν τῷ πολλῷ χρόνῳ καὶ τοῖς πολλοῖς ἔτεσιν, ἐν οἷς οὐκ ἂν ἔλαθεν,1 εἰ ταῦτα καλῶς εἶχεν· πάντα γὰρ σχεδὸν εὕρηται μέν, ἀλλὰ τὰ μὲν οὐ συνῆκται, τοῖς δʼ οὐ χρῶνται γινώσκοντες. μάλιστα δʼ ἂν γένοιτο φανερὸν εἴ τις τοῖς ἔργοις ἴδοι τὴν τοιαύτην πολιτείαν κατασκευαζομένην· οὐ γὰρ δυνήσεται μὴ μερίζων αὐτὰ καὶ χωρίζων ποιῆσαι τὴν πόλιν, τὰ μὲν εἰς συσσίτια τὰ δὲ εἰς φατρίας καὶ φυλάς. ὥστε οὐδὲν ἄλλο συμβήσεται νενομοθετημένον πλὴν μὴ γεωργεῖν τοὺς φύλακας· ὅπερ καὶ νῦν Λακεδαιμόνιοι ποιεῖν ἐπιχειροῦσιν. οὐ μὴν ἀλλʼ οὐδὲ ὁ τρόπος τῆς ὅλης πολιτείας τίς ἔσται τοῖς κοινωνοῦσιν, οὔτʼ εἴρηκεν ὁ Σωκράτης οὔτε ῥᾴδιον εἰπεῖν. καίτοι σχεδὸν τό γε πλῆθος τῆς πόλεως τὸ τῶν ἄλλων πολιτῶν γίνεται πλῆθος, περὶ ὧν οὐδὲν διώρισται, πότερον καὶ τοῖς γεωργοῖς κοινὰς εἶναι δεῖ τὰς κτήσεις ἢ καὶ καθʼ ἕκαστον ἰδίας, ἔτι δὲ καὶ γυναῖκας καὶ παῖδας ἰδίους ἢ κοινούς. εἰ μὲν γὰρ τὸν αὐτὸν τρόπον κοινὰ πάντα πάντων, τί διοίσουσιν οὗτοι ἐκείνων τῶν φυλάκων; ἢ τί πλεῖον αὐτοῖς ὑπομένουσι2 τὴν ἀρχὴν αὐτῶν, ἢ τί μαθόντες ὑπομενοῦσι τὴν ἀρχήν, ἐὰν μή τι σοφίζωνται τοιοῦτον οἷον Κρῆτες; ἐκεῖνοι γὰρ τἆλλα ταὐτὰ τοῖς δούλοις ἐφέντες μόνον ἀπειρήκασι τὰ γυμνάσια καὶ τὴν τῶν ὅπλων κτῆσιν. εἰ δέ, καθάπερ ἐν ταῖς ἄλλαις πόλεσι, καὶ παρʼ ἐκείνοις ἔσται τὰ τοιαῦτα, τίς ὁ τρόπος ἔσται τῆς κοινωνίας; ἐν μιᾷ γὰρ πόλει δύο πόλεις ἀναγκαῖον εἶναι, καὶ ταύτας ὑπεναντίας ἀλλήλαις. ποιεῖ γὰρ τοὺς μὲν φύλακας οἷον φρουρούς, τοὺς δὲ γεωργοὺς καὶ τοὺς τεχνίτας καὶ τοὺς ἄλλους πολίτας· ἐγκλήματα δὲ καὶ δίκαι, καὶ ὅσα ἄλλα ταῖς πόλεσιν ὑπάρχειν φησὶ κακά, πάνθʼ ὑπάρξει καὶ τούτοις. καίτοι λέγει ὁ Σωκράτης ὡς οὐ πολλῶν δεήσονται νομίμων διὰ τὴν παιδείαν, οἷον ἀστυνομικῶν καὶ ἀγορανομικῶν καὶ τῶν ἄλλων τῶν τοιούτων, ἀποδιδοὺς μόνον τὴν παιδείαν τοῖς φύλαξιν. ἔτι δὲ κυρίους ποιεῖ τῶν κτημάτων τοὺς γεωργοὺς τοὺς ἀποφορὰν φέροντας· ἀλλὰ πολὺ μᾶλλον εἰκὸς εἶναι χαλεποὺς3 καὶ φρονημάτων πλήρεις, ἢ τὰς παρʼ ἐνίοις εἱλωτείας τε καὶ πενεστείας καὶ δουλείας. ἀλλὰ γὰρ εἴτʼ ἀναγκαῖα ταῦθʼ ὁμοίως εἴτε μή, νῦν γε οὐδὲν διώρισται. καὶ περὶ τῶν ἐχομένων τίς ἡ τούτων τε πολιτεία καὶ παιδεία καὶ νόμοι τίνες. ἔστι δʼ οὔθʼ εὑρεῖν ῥᾴδιον, οὔτε τὸ διαφέρον μικρὸν, τὸ ποιούς τινας εἶναι τούτους πρὸς τὸ σῴζεσθαι τὴν τῶν φυλάκων κοινωνίαν.
And we must not fail to know this very thing, that one ought to pay attention to the long time and the many years, in which it would not have remained unnoticed if these things were good. For almost all things have indeed been discovered, but some have not been gathered together, and others people do not use although they know them. And this would become most manifest if one were to see such a constitution being actually constructed in practice. For he will not be able to make the city without dividing and separating it, some into common meals, and others into phratries and tribes. So that nothing else will turn out to have been legislated except that the guardians are not to farm, which is just what the Lacedaemonians even now attempt to do. However, as to what the manner of the whole constitution will be for those who participate in it, Socrates has neither said, nor is it easy to say. And yet almost the multitude of the city becomes the multitude of the other citizens, concerning whom nothing has been defined, whether for the farmers also property must be common or private for each individual, and further whether their wives and children are to be private or common. For if indeed everything is common to all in the same manner, how will these differ from those guardians? Or what more will there be for them in enduring their rule, or what is their reason for enduring the rule, unless they use some such artifice as the Cretans? For those, while permitting other things in the same way to their slaves, have only forbidden them the gymnasia and the possession of arms. But if, just as in other cities, such things are to exist among them, what will be the manner of their community? For in one city it is necessary that there be two cities, and these contrary to one another. For he makes the guardians like a garrison, and the farmers, artisans, and other citizens; and complaints, lawsuits, and all the other evils which he says exist in cities, will all exist among these too. And yet Socrates says that because of their education they will not need many regulations, such as those of police, market, and other such things, though he attributes the education only to the guardians. Furthermore, he makes the farmers who pay tribute the masters of the property; but it is likely that they will be much more difficult and full of pride than the Helots, Penestae, and slaves among some peoples. However, whether these things are equally necessary or not, nothing has now been defined. And also concerning the connected matters, what is the constitution and education of these people, and what laws they will have. And it is neither easy to find, nor is the difference a small one, as to what kind of people these should be for the preservation of the community of the guardians.
- 2.1264aἐν οἷς οὐκ ἂν ἔλαθεν
The relative clause 'ἐν οἷς' refers back to 'the long time and many years'. 'οὐκ ἂν ἔλαθεν' is the past indicative of 'λανθάνω' (to escape notice) with the particle 'ἄν', forming the apodosis of a past contrary-to-fact conditional sentence whose protasis is 'εἰ ταῦτα καλῶς εἶχεν' ('if these things were good'), meaning 'it would not have remained unnoticed'.
- 2.1264aαὐτοῖς ὑπομένουσι
The dative pronoun 'αὐτοῖς' functions as a dative of interest (or possession), and is modified by the present active participle 'ὑπομένουσι' (dative plural), meaning 'for them who endure their rule, what more will there be?'
- 2.1264aεἰκὸς εἶναι χαλεποὺς
This is an accusative and infinitive construction depending on the impersonal adjective 'εἰκός' (natural, likely). The accusative subject of the infinitive 'εἶναι' is 'χαλεποὺς καὶ φρονημάτων πλήρεις' (meaning 'that they will be difficult and full of pride'), where the verb would normally be 'ἐστίν' in the direct indicative.
