← Aristotle

Metaphysics

§13.5

Criticism of Forms as Ineffective for Sensible Things

Aristotle points out that the Forms contribute nothing to the existence or knowledge of sensible and changing things, nor do they serve as causes of motion; he dismisses the notions of patterns and participation as mere poetic metaphors and argues against the separate existence of substances from their things.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§13.5

πάντων δὲ μάλιστα διαπορήσειεν ἄν τις τί ποτε συμβάλλονται1 τὰ εἴδη ἢ τοῖς ἀϊδίοις τῶν αἰσθητῶν ἢ τοῖς γιγνομένοις καὶ φθειρομένοις· οὔτε γὰρ κινήσεώς ἐστιν οὔτε μεταβολῆς οὐδεμιᾶς αἴτια αὐτοῖς. ἀλλὰ μὴν οὔτε πρὸς τὴν ἐπιστήμην οὐθὲν βοηθεῖ τὴν τῶν ἄλλων (οὐδὲ γὰρ οὐσία ἐκεῖνα τούτων· ἐν τούτοις γὰρ ἂν ἦν), οὔτʼ εἰς τὸ εἶναι, μὴ ἐνυπάρχοντά γε2 τοῖς μετέχουσιν· οὕτω μὲν γὰρ ἴσως αἴτια δόξειεν ἂν εἶναι ὡς τὸ λευκὸν μεμιγμένον τῷ λευκῷ, ἀλλʼ οὗτος μὲν ὁ λόγος λίαν εὐκίνητος, ὃν Ἀναξαγόρας μὲν πρότερος Εὔδοξος δὲ ὕστερος ἔλεγε διαπορῶν καὶ ἕτεροί τινες (ῥᾴδιον γὰρ πολλὰ συναγαγεῖν καὶ ἀδύνατα πρὸς τὴν τοιαύτην δόξαν)· ἀλλὰ μὴν οὐδὲ ἐκ τῶν εἰδῶν ἐστὶ τἆλλα κατʼ οὐθένα τρόπον τῶν εἰωθότων λέγεσθαι. τὸ δὲ λέγειν παραδείγματα εἶναι καὶ μετέχειν αὐτῶν τὰ ἄλλα κενολογεῖν ἐστὶ καὶ μεταφορὰς λέγειν ποιητικάς. τί γάρ ἐστι τὸ ἐργαζόμενον πρὸς τὰς ἰδέας ἀποβλέπον; ἐνδέχεταί τε καὶ εἶναι καὶ γίγνεσθαι ὁτιοῦν καὶ μὴ εἰκαζόμενον, ὥστε καὶ ὄντος Σωκράτους καὶ μὴ ὄντος3 γένοιτʼ ἂν οἷος Σωκράτης· ὁμοίως δὲ δῆλον ὅτι κἂν εἰ ἦν ὁ Σωκράτης ἀΐδιος. ἔσται τε πλείω παραδείγματα τοῦ αὐτοῦ, ὥστε καὶ εἴδη, οἷον τοῦ ἀνθρώπου τὸ ζῷον καὶ τὸ δίπουν, ἅμα δὲ καὶ αὐτοάνθρωπος. ἔτι οὐ μόνον τῶν αἰσθητῶν παραδείγματα τὰ εἴδη ἀλλὰ καὶ αὐτῶν, οἷον τὸ γένος τῶν ὡς γένους εἰδῶν· ὥστε τὸ αὐτὸ ἔσται παράδειγμα καὶ εἰκών. ἔτι δόξειεν ἂν ἀδύνατον χωρὶς εἶναι τὴν οὐσίαν καὶ οὗ ἡ οὐσία· ὥστε πῶς ἂν αἱ ἰδέαι οὐσίαι τῶν πραγμάτων οὖσαι χωρὶς εἶεν; ἐν δὲ τῷ Φαίδωνι τοῦτον λέγεται τὸν τρόπον, ὡς καὶ τοῦ εἶναι καὶ τοῦ γίγνεσθαι αἴτια τὰ εἴδη ἐστίν· καίτοι τῶν εἰδῶν ὄντων4 ὅμως οὐ γίγνεται ἂν μὴ ᾖ τὸ κινῆσον, καὶ πολλὰ γίγνεται ἕτερα, οἷον οἰκία καὶ δακτύλιος, ὧν οὔ φασιν εἶναι εἴδη· ὥστε δῆλον ὅτι ἐνδέχεται κἀκεῖνα, ὧν φασὶν ἰδέας εἶναι, καὶ εἶναι καὶ γίγνεσθαι διὰ τοιαύτας αἰτίας οἵας καὶ τὰ ῥηθέντα νῦν, ἀλλʼ οὐ διὰ τὰ εἴδη. ἀλλὰ περὶ μὲν τῶν ἰδεῶν καὶ τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον καὶ διὰ λογικωτέρων καὶ ἀκριβεστέρων λόγων ἔστι πολλὰ συναγαγεῖν ὅμοια τοῖς τεθεωρημένοις.

​But of all things, one might be most puzzled as to what on earth the Forms contribute either to the eternal of sensible things or to those that come to be and perish; for they are causes of neither movement nor of any change to them. Further, they help in no way towards the knowledge of other things (for those are not the substance of these; for if they were, they would be in them), nor towards their being, since they do not exist in the participating things; for in this way they might perhaps seem to be causes, as white mixed with a white thing, but this theory is very easily upset, which Anaxagoras first and Eudoxus later asserted in their difficulty, and certain others (for it is easy to collect many impossible consequences against such an opinion). Moreover, other things are not from the Forms in any of the ways that are customarily said. And to say that they are patterns and that other things participate in them is to speak empty words and to use poetical metaphors. For what is it that works looking towards the Ideas? And it is possible for anything both to be and to come to be without being modeled on them; so that, whether Socrates exists or does not exist, a man like Socrates might come to be; and likewise, it is clear that even if Socrates were eternal, the same would hold. And there will be several patterns of the same thing, so also several Forms; for example, of ‘man’, ‘animal’ and ‘two-footed’, and at the same time also ‘man-himself’. Furthermore, the Forms are patterns not only of sensible things but also of themselves, for example, the genus of the species-as-genus; so that the same thing will be both pattern and image. Furthermore, it would seem impossible for the substance and that of which it is the substance to exist separately; so how could the Ideas, being the substances of things, exist separately? But in the Phaedo it is stated in this way, that the Forms are causes both of being and of coming to be; and yet, though the Forms exist, still things do not come to be unless there is something to move them; and many other things come to be, such as a house and a ring, of which they say there are no Forms; so that it is clear that those things also, of which they say there are Ideas, can both be and come to be through such causes as the things just mentioned, but not through the Forms. But concerning the Ideas, both in this way and through more logical and precise arguments, it is possible to collect many things similar to those we have considered.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 1079b12τί ποτε συμβάλλονται

    The accusative interrogative pronoun τί is an internal (adverbial) accusative, used with the middle verb συμβάλλονται to mean 'what/to what extent do they contribute'. The datives τοῖς ἀϊδίοις and τοῖς γιγνομένοις indicate the recipients of this contribution.

  2. 1079b18μὴ ἐνυπάρχοντά γε

    The nominative neuter plural participle ἐνυπάρχοντα modifies the subject τὰ εἴδη. Accompanied by the negator μή, and in contrast with the subsequent οὕτω μὲν γὰρ... ('for in this way [i.e., if they did exist in them]...'), it carries a conditional force: 'if indeed they do not exist in'.

  3. 1079b28καὶ ὄντος Σωκράτους καὶ μὴ ὄντος

    A genitive absolute construction expressing condition or concession ('whether Socrates exists or does not exist'). Together with γένοιτʼ ἄν in the main clause indicating potentiality, it sets up the premise of a thought experiment demonstrating the causal irrelevance of the Forms.

  4. 1080a3τῶν εἰδῶν ὄντων

    A genitive absolute construction preceded by the adversative particle καίτοι, expressing concession ('although the Forms exist'). It serves to establish the argument that the mere existence of Forms is insufficient to account for coming to be without an efficient cause.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg025.humanitext-grc2:13.5