← Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§9.8.50-9.8.56

Protagoras: Life, Doctrines, and Works

This section recounts the origin, lineage, and doctrines of the sophist Protagoras—including his "man is the measure" statement and agnosticism—his book-burning and banishment from Athens, his rhetorical divisions and catalogue of works, his death, and the paradox of the fee dispute with Euathlus.

← PrevNext →

Πρωταγόρας Ἀρτέμωνος ἤ, ὡς Ἀπολλόδωρος καὶ Δείνων ἐν Περσικῷ εʼ, Μαιανδρίου Ἀβδηρίτης, καθά φησιν Ἡρακλείδης ὁ Ποντικὸς ἐν τοῖς Περὶ νόμων, ὃς καὶ Θουρίοις νόμους γράψαι φησὶν αὐτόν· ὡς δʼ Εὔπολις ἐν Κόλαξιν, Τήιος· φησὶ γάρ, "Ἔνδοθι μέν ἐστι Πρωταγόρας ὁ Τήιος." οὗτος καὶ Πρόδικος ὁ Κεῖος λόγους ἀναγινώσκοντες ἠρανίζοντο· καὶ Πλάτων ἐν τῷ Πρωταγόρᾳ φησὶ βαρύφωνον εἶναι τὸν Πρόδικον. διήκουσε δʼ ὁ Πρωταγόρας Δημοκρίτου. ἐκαλεῖτό τε Σοφία, ὥς φησι Φαβωρῖνος ἐν Παντοδαπῇ ἱστορίᾳ.

​Protagoras was the son of Artemon, or, as Apollodorus and Dinon in the fifth book of his Persian History say, of Maeandrius; he was an Abderite, as Pontic Heraclides says in his work On Laws, who also says that he wrote laws for the Thurians; but according to Eupolis in the Flatterers, he was a Teian; for he says: "Within is Protagoras the Teian." He and Prodicus of Ceos collected contributions by giving public readings of their discourses; and Plato in the Protagoras says that Prodicus had a deep voice. Protagoras was a pupil of Democritus. He was also called Wisdom, as Favorinus says in his Miscellaneous History.

Καὶ πρῶτος ἔφη δύο λόγους εἶναι περὶ παντὸς πράγματος ἀντικειμένους ἀλλήλοις· οἷς καὶ συνηρώτα, πρῶτος τοῦτο πράξας. ἀλλὰ καὶ ἤρξατό που τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον· πάντων χρημάτων μέτρον ἄνθρωπος, τῶν μὲν ὄντων ὡς ἔστιν, τῶν δὲ οὐκ ὄντων ὡς οὐκ ἔστιν. ἔλεγέ τε μηδὲν εἶναι ψυχὴν παρὰ τὰς αἰσθήσεις, καθὰ καὶ Πλάτων φησὶν ἐν Θεαιτήτῳ, καὶ πάντʼ εἶναι ἀληθῆ. καὶ ἀλλαχοῦ δὲ τοῦτον ἤρξατο τὸν τρόπον· περὶ μὲν θεῶν οὐκ ἔχω εἰδέναι οὔθʼ ὡς εἰσίν, οὔθʼ ὡς οὐκ εἰσίν· πολλὰ γὰρ τὰ κωλύοντα εἰδέναι, ἥ τʼ ἀδηλότης καὶ βραχὺς ὢν ὁ βίος τοῦ ἀνθρώπου1.

​He was the first to assert that there are two arguments opposed to each other concerning every subject; and with these he also used to conduct cross-examinations, being the first to do so. Moreover, he also began in somewhere the following manner: "Man is the measure of all things, of the things that are that they are, and of the things that are not that they are not." And he used to say that the soul is nothing other than the senses, as Plato too says in the Theaetetus, and that all things are true. Elsewhere, too, he began in this manner: "Concerning the gods, I am unable to know either that they are or that they are not; for there are many things that prevent knowledge, the obscurity of the matter and the life of man being short."

διὰ ταύτην δὲ τὴν ἀρχὴν τοῦ συγγράμματος ἐξεβλήθη πρὸς Ἀθηναίων· καὶ τὰ βιβλίʼ αὐτοῦ κατέκαυσαν ἐν τῇ ἀγορᾷ, ὑπὸ κήρυκι ἀναλεξάμενοι παρʼ ἑκάστου τῶν κεκτημένων. Οὗτος πρῶτος μισθὸν εἰσεπράξατο μνᾶς ἑκατόν· καὶ πρῶτος μέρη χρόνου διώρισε καὶ καιροῦ δύναμιν ἐξέθετο καὶ λόγωνἀγῶνας ἐποιήσατο καὶ σοφίσματα τοῖς πραγματολογοῦσι προσήγαγε· καὶ τὴν διάνοιαν ἀφεὶς πρὸς τοὔνομα διελέχθη καὶ τὸ νῦν ἐπιπόλαιον γένος τῶν ἐριστικῶν ἐγέννησεν· ἵνα καὶ Τίμων φησὶ περὶ αὐτοῦ, "Πρωταγόρης τʼ ἐπίμεικτος ἐριζέμεναι εὖ εἰδώς."

​Because of this beginning of his treatise, he was expelled by the Athenians; and they burned his books in the marketplace, having gathered them from each of their owners by means of a public herald. This man was the first to charge a fee of one hundred minae; he was the first to distinguish the parts of time, to expound the power of the opportune moment, to establish verbal contests, and to introduce sophisms to practitioners of forensics; and abandoning the thought, he argued against the bare name, and gave birth to the present superficial tribe of disputants; wherefore Timon too says concerning him: "And Protagoras, that mongrel, well versed in disputing."

οὗτος καὶ τὸ Σωκρατικὸν εἶδος τῶν λόγων πρῶτος ἐκίνησε. καὶ τὸν Ἀντισθένους λόγον τὸν πειρώμενον ἀποδεικνύειν ὡς οὐκ ἔστιν ἀντιλέγειν, οὗτος πρῶτος διείλεκται2, καθά φησι Πλάτων ἐν Εὐθυδήμῳ. καὶ πρῶτος κατέδειξε τὰς πρὸς τὰς θέσεις ἐπιχειρήσεις, ὥς φησιν Ἀρτεμίδωρος ὁ διαλεκτικὸς ἐν τῷ Πρὸς Χρύσιππον. καὶ πρῶτος τὴν καλουμένην τύλην, ἐφʼ ἧς τὰ φορτία βαστάζουσιν, εὗρεν, ὥς φησιν Ἀριστοτέλης ἐν τῷ Περὶ παιδείας· φορμοφόρος γὰρ ἦν, ὡς καὶ Ἐπίκουρός πού φησι. καὶ τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον ἤρθη πρὸς Δημοκρίτου ξύλα δεδεκὼς ὀφθείς. διεῖλέ τε τὸν λόγον πρῶτος εἰς τέτταρα, εὐχωλήν, ἐρώτησιν, ἀπόκρισιν, ἐντολήν·

​He was also the first to set in motion the Socratic form of discourse. And he was the first to argue against the thesis of Antisthenes which attempts to prove that it is impossible to contradict, as Plato says in the Euthydemus. He was also the first to point out the methods of attack against philosophical theses, as Artemidorus the dialectician says in his Against Chrysippus. And he was the first to invent the so-called porter's pad, upon which they carry burdens, as Aristotle says in his On Education; for he was a porter, as Epicurus also says somewhere. And in this way he was taken up by Democritus, having been observed binding wood together. He was also the first to divide speech into four parts: wish, question, answer, and command;

(οἱ 〈·〉ὲ εἰς ἑπτά, διήγησιν, ἐρώτησιν, ἀπόκρισιν, ἐντολήν, ἀπαγγελίαν, εὐχωλήν, κλῆσιν), οὓς καὶ πυθμένας εἶπε λόγων. Ἀλκιδάμας δὲ τέτταρας λόγους φησί, φάσιν, ἀπόφασιν, ἐρώτησιν, προσαγόρευσιν. Πρῶτον δὲ τῶν λόγων ἑαυτοῦ ἀνέγνω τὸν Περὶ θεῶν, οὗ τὴν ἀρχὴν ἄνω παρεθέμεθα· ἀνέγνω δʼ Ἀθήνησιν ἐν τῇ Εὐριπίδου οἰκίᾳ ἤ, ὥς τινες, ἐν τῇ Μεγακλείδου· ἄλλοι ἐν Λυκείῳ, μαθητοῦ τὴν φωνὴν αὐτῷ χρήσαντος Ἀρχαγόρου τοῦ Θεοδότου. κατηγόρησε δʼ αὐτοῦ Πυθόδωρος Πολυζήλου, εἷς τῶν τετρακοσίων· Ἀριστοτέλης δʼ Εὔαθλόν φησιν.

(others, however, say into seven: narrative, question, answer, command, report, wish, and address), which he also called the roots of speech. But Alcidamas says that there are four kinds of speech: affirmation, denial, question, and address. The first of his works that he read publicly was that On the Gods, whose opening we cited above; he read it at Athens in the house of Euripides, or, as some say, in that of Megacleides; others say in the Lyceum, with his pupil Archagoras, the son of Theodotus, lending him his voice. He was accused by Pythodorus the son of Polyzelus, one of the Four Hundred; but Aristotle says it was by Euathlus.

Ἔστι δὲ τὰ σωζόμενα αὐτοῦ βιβλία τάδε· * * Τέχνη ἐριστικῶν. Περὶ πάλης. Περὶ τῶν μαθημάτων. Περὶ πολιτείας. Περὶ φιλοτιμίας. Περὶ ἀρετῶν. Περὶ τῆς ἐν ἀρχῇ καταστάσεως. Περὶ τῶν ἐν Ἅιδου. Περὶ τῶν οὐκ ὀρθῶς τοῖς ἀνθρώποις πρασσομένων. Προστακτικός. Δίκη ὑπὲρ μισθοῦ, Ἀντιλογιῶν α′ β′. καὶ ταῦτα μὲν αὐτῷ τὰ βιβλία. γέγραφε δὲ καὶ Πλάτων εἰς αὐτὸν διάλογον. Φησὶ δὲ Φιλόχορος, πλέοντος αὐτοῦ ἐς Σικελίαν, τὴν ναῦν καταποντωθῆναι· καὶ τοῦτο αἰνίττεσθαι Εὐριπίδην ἐν τῷ Ἰξίονι. ἔνιοι κατὰ τὴν ὁδὸν τελευτῆσαι αὐτόν, βιώσαντα ἔτη πρὸς τὰ ἐνενήκοντα·

​The following of his books are extant: The Art of Disputation; On Wrestling; On the Sciences; On the State; On Ambition; On the Virtues; On the Original State of Things; On the Things in Hades; On the Errors of Mankind; Precepts; Lawsuit Concerning a Fee, Contradictions, Books I and II. These are his books. Plato has also written a dialogue against him. Philochorus says that while he was sailing to Sicily, his ship sank; and that Euripides hints at this in his Ixion. Some say that he died on a journey, having lived nearly ninety years;

Ἀπολλόδωρος δέ φησιν ἑβδομήκοντα, σοφιστεῦσαι δὲ τεσσαράκοντα καὶ ἀκμάζειν κατὰ τὴν τετάρτην καὶ ὀγδοηκοστὴν Ὀλυμπιάδα. Ἔστι καὶ εἰς τοῦτον ἡμῶν οὕτως ἔχον· "καὶ σεῦ, Πρωταγόρη, φάτιν ἔκλυον, ὡς ἄρʼ Ἀθηνέων ἔκ ποτʼ ἰὼν καθʼ ὁδὸν πρέσβυς ἐὼν ἔθανες· εἵλετο γάρ σε φυγεῖν Κέκροπος πόλις· ἀλλὰ σὺ μέν που Παλλάδος ἄστυ φύγες, Πλουτέα δʼ οὐκ ἔφυγες." Λέγεται δέ ποτʼ αὐτὸν ἀπαιτοῦντα τὸν μισθὸν Εὔαθλον τὸν μαθητήν, ἐκείνου εἰπόντος, ἀλλʼ οὐδέπω νίκην νενίκηκα, εἰπεῖν, ἀλλʼ ἐγὼ μὲν ἂν νικήσω, ὅτι ἐγὼ ἐνίκησα, λαβεῖν με δεῖ· ἐὰν δὲ σύ, ὅτι σύ3. Γέγονε δὲ καὶ ἄλλος Πρωταγόρας ἀστρολόγος, εἰς ὃν καὶ Εὐφορίων ἐπικήδειον ἔγραψε· καὶ τρίτος Στωικὸς φιλόσοφος.

​but Apollodorus says seventy, and that he was a sophist for forty years, and flourished during the eighty-fourth Olympiad. There is also an epigram of our own on him, runs as follows: "Of thee too, Protagoras, I have heard the tale, that going once from Athens, an old man on a journey, thou didst die; for the city of Cecrops resolved that thou shouldst flee; but while thou didst escape Pallas' town, thou didst not escape Pluto." It is said that once, when he demanded his fee from his pupil Euathlus, and the latter replied, "But I have not yet won a victory," he said: "Nay, but if I win, because I have won, I must receive it; and if thou winnest, because thou [hast won]." There was also another Protagoras, an astronomer, on whom Euphorion also wrote a dirge; and a third who was a Stoic philosopher.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 9.8.51ἥ τʼ ἀδηλότης καὶ βραχὺς ὢν ὁ βίος τοῦ ἀνθρώπου

    Following the subject noun phrase ἥ τʼ ἀδηλότης ('the obscurity'), the phrase βραχὺς ὢν ὁ βίος τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ('the life of man being short') is coordinated by καί as the second explanatory subject to τὰ κωλύοντα ('the things that prevent'). The participle ὤν combines with the noun phrase to express an abstract state/fact equivalent to a nominal clause.

  2. 9.8.53καὶ τὸν Ἀντισθένους λόγον τὸν πειρώμενον ἀποδεικνύειν ὡς οὐκ ἔστιν ἀντιλέγειν, οὗτος πρῶτος διείλεκται

    The accusative phrase τὸν Ἀντισθένους λόγον is placed prominently at the beginning (prolepsis / fronted accusative), followed by the subject οὗτος and the perfect verb διείλεκται (from διαλέγομαι). Here, διαλέγομαι, which is usually intransitive, governs an accusative of topic or internal object, meaning 'argued against / debated the thesis of Antisthenes.'

  3. 9.8.56ἐὰν δὲ σύ, ὅτι σύ

    An extreme ellipsis in the second half of the antithesis: contrasted with ἀλλʼ ἐγὼ μὲν ἂν νικήσω, ὅτι ἐγὼ ἐνίκησα, λαβεῖν με δεῖ, the clause ἐὰν δὲ σύ, ὅτι σύ leaves unexpressed the verb of the condition and the main clause: ἐὰν δὲ σὺ [νικήσῃς], ὅτι σὺ [ἐνίκησας, λαβεῖν με δεῖ] ('and if you win, because you [have won, I must receive it]').

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:9.8.50-9.8.56