- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:9.5.25-9.5.29
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-09-29
The account details the origins of Zeno of Elea, his pupilage under Parmenides, his renown as the inventor of dialectic, his courageous conspiracy and brutal martyrdom under a tyrant, his attachment to his native city, and his paradoxes and physical doctrines.
Ζήνων Ἐλεάτης. τοῦτον Ἀπολλόδωρός φησιν εἶναι ἐν Χρονικοῖς [Πύρητος τὸν δὲ Παρμενίδην] φύσει μὲν Τελευταγόρου, θέσει δὲ Παρμενίδου 〈τὸν δὲ Παρμενίδην Πύρητος〉. περὶ τούτου καὶ Μελίσσου Τίμων φησὶ ταῦτα· "ἀμφοτερογλώσσου1 τε μέγα σθένος οὐκ ἀλαπαδνὸν Ζήνωνος πάντων ἐπιλήπτορος, ἠδὲ Μέλισσον, πολλῶν φαντασμῶν ἐπάνω, παύρων γε μὲν ἥσσω." Ὁ δὴ Ζήνων διακήκοε Παρμενίδου καὶ γέγονεν αὐτοῦ παιδικά. καὶ εὐμήκης ἦν, καθά φησι Πλάτων ἐν τῷ Παρμενίδῃ, ὁ δʼ αὐτὸς ἐν τῷ Σοφιστῇ καὶ ἐν τῷ Φαίδρῳ 〈αὐτοῦ μέμνηται〉 καὶ Ἐλεατικὸν Παλαμήδην αὐτὸν καλεῖ. φησὶ δʼ Ἀριστοτέλης εὑρετὴν αὐτὸν γενέσθαι διαλεκτικῆς, ὥσπερ Ἐμπεδοκλέα ῥητορικῆς.
Zeno of Elea. Apollodorus says in his Chronology that he was by nature the son of Teleutagoras, but by adoption the son of Parmenides (and that Parmenides was the son of Pyres). Concerning him and Melissus, Timon says the following: “And the great, not feeble strength of double-tongued Zeno, critic of all things, and Melissus too, above many delusions, yet yielding to a few.” Now Zeno had heard Parmenides lecture and had become his beloved. He was also tall of stature, as Plato says in the Parmenides; and the same Plato mentions him in the Sophist and the Phaedrus, calling him the Eleatic Palamedes. Aristotle says that he became the discoverer of dialectic, just as Empedocles was of rhetoric.
Γέγονε δὲ ἀνὴρ γενναιότατος καὶ ἐν φιλοσοφίᾳ καὶ ἐν πολιτείᾳ· φέρεται γοῦν αὐτοῦ βιβλία πολλῆς συνέσεως γέμοντα. καθελεῖν δὲ θελήσας Νέαρχον τὸν τύραννον—οἱ δὲ Διομέδοντα—συνελήφθη, καθά φησιν Ἡρακλείδης ἐν τῇ Σατύρου ἐπιτομῇ. ὅτε καὶ ἐξεταζόμενος τοὺς συνειδότας καὶ περὶ τῶν ὅπλων2 ὧν ἦγεν εἰς Λιπάραν, πάντας ἐμήνυσεν αὐτοῦ τοὺς φίλους, βουλόμενος αὐτὸν ἔρημον καταστῆσαι· εἶτα περί τινων εἰπεῖν ἔχειν τινα 〈ἔφη〉 αὐτῷ πρὸς τὸ οὖς καὶ δακὼν οὐκ ἀνῆκεν ἕως ἀπεκεντήθη, ταὐτὸν Ἀριστογείτονι τῷ τυραννοκτόνῳ παθών.
He proved to be a man of the greatest nobility both in philosophy and in politics. At any rate, books of his full of great understanding are in circulation. Desiring to depose the tyrant Nearchus—or according to others, Diomedon—he was arrested, as Heraclides says in his Epitome of Satyrus. On that occasion, when he was examined concerning his accomplices and about the weapons that he was conveying to Lipara, he denounced all the tyrant's own friends, wishing to leave him isolated. Then, saying that he had something to tell him in his ear, he bit onto it and did not let go until he was stabbed to death, suffering the same fate as the tyrannicide Aristogeiton.
Δημήτριος δέ φησιν ἐν τοῖς Ὁμωνύμοις τὸν μυκτῆρα αὐτὸν ἀποτραγεῖν. Ἀντισθένης δὲ ἐν ταῖς Διαδοχαῖς φησι μετὰ τὸ μηνῦσαι τοὺς φίλους ἐρωτηθῆναι πρὸς τοῦ τυράννου εἴ τις ἄλλος εἴη· τὸν δὲ εἰπεῖν, σὺ ὁ τῆς πόλεως ἀλιτήριος. πρός τε τοὺς παρεστῶτας φάναι· θαυμάζω ὑμῶν τὴν δειλίαν, εἰ τούτων ἕνεκεν ὧν νῦν ἐγὼ ὑπομένω, δουλεύετε τῷ τυράννῳ· καὶ τέλος ἀποτραγόντα τὴν γλῶτταν προσπτύσαι αὐτῷ· τοὺς δὲ πολίτας παρορμηθέντας αὐτίκα τὸν τύραννον καταλεῦσαι. ταὐτὰ δὲ σχεδὸν οἱ πλείους λαλοῦσιν. Ἕρμιππος δέ φησιν εἰς ὅλμον αὐτὸν βληθῆναι καὶ κατακοπῆναι.
Demetrius says in his Men of the Same Name that he bit off the tyrant's nose. Antisthenes, in his Successions, says that after denouncing the tyrant's friends, when asked by the tyrant whether there was anyone else, he said, “You, the curse of the city!” And to the bystanders he said, “I marvel at your cowardice, if for fear of these things which I now endure, you remain slaves to the tyrant!” And finally, biting off his own tongue, he spat it at him; whereupon the citizens, stirred to action, immediately stoned the tyrant to death. Nearly the same account is given by most writers. But Hermippus says that he was cast into a mortar and pounded to pieces.
Καὶ εἰς αὐτὸν ἡμεῖς εἴπομεν οὕτως· "ἤθελες, ὦ Ζήνων, καλὸν ἤθελες ἄνδρα τύραννον κτείνας ἐκλῦσαι δουλοσύνης Ἐλέαν. ἀλλʼ ἐδάμης· δὴ γάρ δε λαβὼν ὁ τύραννος ἐν ὅλμῳ κόψε. τί τοῦτο λέγω; σῶμα γάρ, οὐχὶ δὲ σέ." Γέγονε δὲ τά τε ἄλλα ἀγαθὸς ὁ Ζήνων, ἀλλὰ καὶ ὑπεροπτικὸς τῶν μειζόνων κατʼ ἴσον Ἡρακλείτῳ· καὶ γὰρ οὗτος τὴν πρότερον μὲν Ὑέλην, ὕστερον δʼ Ἐλέαν, Φωκαέων οὖσαν ἀποικίαν, αὑτοῦ δὲ πατρίδα, πόλιν εὐτελῆ καὶ μόνον ἄνδρας ἀγαθοὺς τρέφειν ἐπισταμένην ἠγάπησε μᾶλλον τῆς Ἀθηναίων μεγαλαυχίας3, οὐκ ἐπιδημήσας πώμαλα πρὸς αὐτούς, ἀλλʼ αὐτόθι καταβιούς.
And concerning him we ourselves have written as follows: “You wished, O Zeno, you wished a noble thing: to slay the tyrant and deliver Elea from slavery. Yet you were overcome; for the tyrant seized you and truly in a mortar pounded you. Why do I say this? For it was your body, and not you!” Zeno was in other respects an excellent man, but he was also contemptuous of men of higher rank, just like Heraclitus. For he loved the city once called Hyele and later Elea, a colony of the Phocaeans and his native city—a frugal town that knew only how to rear good men—more than the boastful pride of the Athenians, never visiting them at all, but spending his life right there.
Οὗτος καὶ τὸν Ἀχιλλέα πρῶτος λόγον ἠρώτησε [Φαβωρῖνος δέ φησι Παρμενίδην] καὶ ἄλλους συχνούς. ἀρέσκει δʼ αὐτῷ τάδε· κόσμους εἶναι κενόν τε μὴ εἶναι· γεγενῆσθαι δὲ τὴν τῶν πάντων φύσιν ἐκ θερμοῦ καὶ ψυχροῦ καὶ ξηροῦ καὶ ὑγροῦ, λαμβανόντων αὐτῶν εἰς ἄλληλα τὴν μεταβολήν· γένεσίν τε ἀνθρώπων ἐκ γῆς εἶναι καὶ ψυχὴν κρᾶμα ὑπάρχειν ἐκ τῶν προειρημένων κατὰ μηδενὸς τούτων ἐπικράτησιν4. Τοῦτόν φασι λοιδορούμενον ἀγανακτῆσαι· αἰτιασαμένου δέ τινος, φάναι ἐὰν μὴ λοιδορούμενος προσποιῶμαι, οὐδʼ ἐπαινούμενος αἰσθήσομαι. Ὅτι δὲ γεγόνασι Ζήνωνες ὀκτὼ ἐν τῷ Κιτιεῖ διειλέγμεθα. ἤκμαζε δʼ οὗτος κατὰ τὴν ἐνάτην 〈καὶ ἑβδομηκοστὴν〉 Ὀλυμπιάδα.
He was also the first to formulate the argument of “Achilles” (though Favorinus says it was Parmenides) and numerous others. His doctrines were as follows: that worlds exist, and that there is no void; that the nature of all things arose from hot, cold, dry, and moist, as these elements undergo change into one another; that the generation of men is from earth, and that the soul is a mixture of the aforesaid elements, with none of them holding dominance. They say that when he was reviled, he became indignant; and when someone reproached him, he said, “If I do not take notice when I am reviled, neither shall I feel it when I am praised.” That there have been eight men named Zeno, we have explained in our account of Zeno of Citium. This one flourished during the seventy-ninth Olympiad.
- 9.5.25ἀμφοτερογλώσσου
A compound adjective describing Zeno in Timon's satire, referring to his ability to argue on both sides of an issue—i.e., his dialectical mastery in proving or refuting opposite propositions.
- 9.5.26ἐξεταζόμενος τοὺς συνειδότας καὶ περὶ τῶν ὅπλων
The passive participle ἐξεταζόμενος takes parallel complements: a direct accusative of the topic of interrogation (τοὺς συνειδότας, 'the accomplices') coordinate with a prepositional phrase (καὶ περὶ τῶν ὅπλων, 'and concerning the weapons').
- 9.5.28ἠγάπησε μᾶλλον τῆς Ἀθηναίων μεγαλαυχίας
The genitive τῆς Ἀθηναίων μεγαλαυχίας is a genitive of comparison governed by μᾶλλον, contrasting the accusative object (τὴν πρότερον μὲν Ὑέλην... πόλιν εὐτελῆ, his frugal native city) with the haughty pride of the Athenians.
- 9.5.29κατὰ μηδενὸς τούτων ἐπικράτησιν
The preposition κατά with the abstract noun ἐπικράτησιν forms an adverbial phrase expressing condition or manner ('without the predominance of any of these'). τούτων functions as an objective genitive dependent on ἐπικράτησιν.
