← Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§8.1.1-8.1.6

Origins, Travels, and Transmigration of Pythagoras

Diogenes Laertius introduces the Italian school, recounting Pythagoras' origin, travels and initiations, activity in Croton, transmigration of souls, and his writings.

← PrevNext →

Ἐπειδὴ δὲ τὴν Ἰωνικὴν φιλοσοφίαν τὴν ἀπὸ Θαλοῦ καὶ τοὺς ἐν ταύτῃ διαγενομένους ἄνδρας ἀξιολόγους διεληλύθαμεν, φέρε καὶ περὶ τῆς Ἰταλικῆς διαλάβωμεν, ἧς ἦρξε Πυθαγόρας Μνησάρχου δακτυλιογλύφου, ὥς φησιν Ἕρμιππος, Σάμιος ἤ, ὡς Ἀριστόξενος, Τυρρηνὸς ἀπὸ μιᾶς τῶν νήσων ἃς ἔσχον Ἀθηναῖοι Τυρρηνοὺς ἐκβαλόντες. ἔνιοι δʼ υἱὸν μὲν εἶναι1 Μαρμάκου τοῦ Ἱππάσου τοῦ Εὐθύφρονος τοῦ Κλεωνύμου φυγάδος ἐκ Φλιοῦντος, οἰκεῖν δʼ ἐν Σάμῳ τὸν Μάρμακον, ὅθεν Σάμιον τὸν Πυθαγόραν λέγεσθαι·

​Now that we have gone through the Ionian philosophy, which begins with Thales, and the noteworthy men who flourished in it, come, let us also treat of the Italian philosophy, which was founded by Pythagoras, the son of Mnesarchus, a gem-engraver, as Hermippus says, a Samian or, as Aristoxenus says, a Tyrrhenian from one of the islands which the Athenians occupied after expelling the Tyrrhenians. But some say that he was the son of Marmacus, the son of Hippasus, the son of Euthyphron, the son of Cleonymus, an exile from Phlius, and that Marmacus lived in Samos, whence Pythagoras came to be called a Samian;

συστῆναι δʼ εἰς Λέσβον ἐλθόντα Φερεκύδῃ ὑπὸ Ζωίλου τοῦ θείου. καὶ τρία ποτήρια κατασκευασάμενος ἀργυρᾶ δῶρον ἀπήνεγκεν ἑκάστῳ τῶν ἱερέων εἰς Αἴγυπτον. ἔσχε δʼ ἀδελφούς, πρεσβύτερον μὲν Εὔνομον, μέσον δὲ Τυρρηνόν· καὶ δοῦλον Ζάμολξιν, ᾧ Γέται θύουσι, Κρόνον νομίζοντες, ὥς φησιν Ἡρόδοτος. οὗτος ἤκουσε μέν, καθὰ προείρηται, Φερεκύδου τοῦ Συρίου· μετὰ δὲ τὴν ἐκείνου τελευτὴν ἧκεν εἰς Σάμον καὶ ἤκουσεν Ἑρμοδάμαντος τοῦ ἀπογόνου Κρεωφύλου, ἤδη πρεσβυτέρου. νέος δʼ ὢν καὶ φιλομαθὴς ἀπεδήμησε τῆς πατρίδος καὶ πάσας ἐμυήθη τάς θʼ Ἑλληνικὰς καὶ βαρβαρικὰς τελετάς.

​and that, having gone to Lesbos, he was introduced to Pherecydes by his uncle Zoilus. And having had three silver cups made, he carried them as a gift to each of the priests in Egypt. He had brothers, the elder Eunomus, and the middle one Tyrrhenus; and a slave, Zamolxis, to whom the Getae sacrifice, believing him to be Cronus, as Herodotus says. He heard, as has been said before, Pherecydes of Syros; and after the latter's death he came to Samos and heard Hermodamas, the descendant of Creophylus, who was already an old man. Being young and fond of learning, he went abroad from his homeland and was initiated into all the rites, both Greek and barbarian.

ἐγένετʼ οὖν ἐν Αἰγύπτῳ, ὁπηνίκα καὶ Πολυκράτης αὐτὸν Ἀμάσιδι συνέστησε διʼ ἐπιστολῆς· καὶ ἐξέμαθε τὴν φωνὴν αὐτῶν, καθά φησιν Ἀντιφῶν ἐν τῷ Περὶ τῶν ἐν ἀρετῇ πρωτευσάντων, καὶ παρὰ Χαλδαίοις ἐγένετο καὶ Μάγοις. εἶτʼ ἐν Κρήτῃ σὺν Ἐπιμενίδῃ κατῆλθεν εἰς τὸ Ἰδαῖον ἄντρον, ἀλλὰ καὶ ἐν Αἰγύπτῳ εἰς τὰ ἄδυτα· καὶ τὰ περὶ θεῶν ἐν ἀπορρήτοις ἔμαθεν. εἶτʼ ἐπανῆλθεν εἰς Σάμον, καὶ εὑρὼν τὴν πατρίδα τυραννουμένην ὑπὸ Πολυκράτους, ἀπῆρεν εἰς Κρότωνα τῆς Ἰταλίας· κἀκεῖ νόμους θεὶς τοῖς Ἰταλιώταις ἐδοξάσθη σὺν τοῖς μαθηταῖς, οἳ πρὸς τοὺς τριακοσίους ὄντες ᾠκονόμουν ἄριστα τὰ πολιτικά, ὥστε σχεδὸν ἀριστοκρατίαν εἶναι τὴν πολιτείαν.

​He was, therefore, in Egypt, at which time Polycrates also recommended him to Amasis by letter; and he learned their language thoroughly, as Antiphon says in his work On Those Who Excelled in Virtue, and he also visited the Chaldaeans and Magi. Then in Crete, together with Epimenides, he descended into the Idaean cave, as well as into the sanctuaries in Egypt; and he learned the secret doctrines concerning the gods. Then he returned to Samos, and finding his fatherland under the tyranny of Polycrates, he set off for Croton in Italy; and there, having laid down laws for the Italiotes, he was held in high esteem together with his disciples, who, being about three hundred, administered public affairs so excellently that the constitution was virtually an aristocracy.

Τοῦτόν φησιν Ἡρακλείδης ὁ Ποντικὸς περὶ αὑτοῦ τάδε λέγειν, ὡς εἴη ποτὲ γεγονὼς Αἰθαλίδης καὶ Ἑρμοῦ υἱὸς νομισθείη· τὸν δὲ Ἑρμῆν εἰπεῖν αὐτῷ2 ἑλέσθαι ὅ τι ἂν βούληται πλὴν ἀθανασίας. αἰτήσασθαι οὖν ζῶντα καὶ τελευτῶντα μνήμην ἔχειν τῶν συμβαινόντων. ἐν μὲν οὖν τῇ ζωῇ πάντων διαμνημονεῦσαι· ἐπεὶ δὲ ἀποθάνοι, τηρῆσαι τὴν αὐτὴν μνήμην. χρόνῳ δʼ ὕστερον εἰς Εὔφορβον ἐλθεῖν καὶ ὑπὸ Μενέλεω τρωθῆναι. ὁ δʼ Εὔφορβος ἔλεγεν ὡς Αἰθαλίδης ποτὲ γεγόνοι καὶ ὅτι παρʼ Ἑρμοῦ τὸ δῶρον λάβοι καὶ τὴν τῆς ψυχῆς περιπόλησιν, ὡς περιεπολήθη καὶ εἰς ὅσα φυτὰ καὶ ζῷα παρεγένετο καὶ ὅσα ἡ ψυχὴ ἐν Ἅιδῃ ἔπαθε καὶ αἱ λοιπαὶ τίνα ὑπομένουσιν.

​Heraclides Ponticus says that Pythagoras used to say the following things about himself: that he had once been born as Aethalides and was regarded as the son of Hermes; and that Hermes told him to choose whatever he wished except immortality. He therefore asked to retain, both while living and when dying, the memory of what happened. Thus during his life he remembered everything; and when he died, he preserved the same memory. In later times he came into Euphorbus and was wounded by Menelaus. And Euphorbus used to say that he had once been Aethalides, and that he had received the gift from Hermes, and about the wanderings of his soul, how it had wandered about and into what kinds of plants and animals it had entered, and what the soul suffered in Hades, and what the rest endure.

ἐπειδὴ δὲ Εὔφορβος ἀποθάνοι, μεταβῆναι τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ εἰς Ἑρμότιμον, ὃς καὶ αὐτὸς πίστιν θέλων δοῦναι εἶτʼ ἀνῆλθεν εἰς Βραγχίδας καὶ εἰσελθὼν εἰς τὸ τοῦ Ἀπόλλωνος ἱερὸν ἐπέδειξεν ἣν Μενέλαος ἀνέθηκεν ἀσπίδα, (ἔφη γὰρ αὐτόν, ὅτʼ ἀπέπλει ἐκ Τροίας, ἀναθεῖναι τῷ Ἀπόλλωνι τὴν ἀσπίδα,) διασεσηπυῖαν ἤδη, μόνον δὲ διαμένον τὸ ἐλεφάντινον πρόσωπον3. ἐπειδὴ δʼ Ἑρμότιμος ἀπέθανε, γενέσθαι Πύρρον τὸν Δήλιον ἁλιέα· καὶ πάντα πάλιν μνημονεύειν, πῶς πρόσθεν Αἰθαλίδης, εἶτʼ Εὔφορβος, εἶτα Ἑρμότιμος, εἶτα Πύρρος γένοιτο. ἐπειδὴ δὲ Πύρρος ἀπέθανε, γενέσθαι Πυθαγόραν καὶ πάντων τῶν εἰρημένων μεμνῆσθαι.

​And when Euphorbus died, his soul passed into Hermotimus, who, wishing himself also to give proof, then went up to Branchidae and, entering the temple of Apollo, pointed out the shield which Menelaus had dedicated (for he said that he, when sailing away from Troy, had dedicated the shield to Apollo), which was already rotted away, with only the ivory face remaining intact. And when Hermotimus died, he became Pyrrhus, the Delian fisherman; and he again remembered everything, how he was formerly Aethalides, then Euphorbus, then Hermotimus, then Pyrrhus. And when Pyrrhus died, he became Pythagoras, and remembered all the things that have been mentioned.

Ἔνιοι μὲν οὖν Πυθαγόραν μηδὲ ἓν καταλιπεῖν σύγγραμμά φασιν παίζοντες. Ἡράκλειτος γοῦν ὁ φυσικὸς μονονουχὶ κέκραγε καί φησι· Πυθαγόρης Μνησάρχου ἱστορίην ἤσκησεν ἀνθρώπων μάλιστα πάντων καὶ ἐκλεξάμενος ταύτας τὰς συγγραφὰς ἐποιήσατο ἑαυτοῦ σοφίην, πολυμαθείην, κακοτεχνίην. οὕτω δʼ εἶπεν, ἐπειδήπερ ἐναρχόμενος ὁ Πυθαγόρας τοῦ Φυσικοῦ συγγράμματος λέγει ὧδε· οὐ μὰ τὸν ἀέρα, τὸν ἀναπνέω, οὐ μὰ τὸ ὕδωρ, τὸ πίνω, οὔ κοτʼ οἴσω ψόγον περὶ τοῦ λόγου τοῦδε. γέγραπται δὲ τῷ Πυθαγόρᾳ συγγράμματα τρία, Παιδευτικόν, Πολιτικόν, Φυσικόν·

​Now some say in jest that Pythagoras left not even a single treatise. At any rate, Heraclitus the natural philosopher all but cries aloud, saying: "Pythagoras, son of Mnesarchus, practiced inquiry beyond all other men, and having made a selection of these writings, he fashioned a wisdom of his own: a polymathy, an evil trickery." And he said this because Pythagoras, at the beginning of his Physical Treatise, speaks as follows: "No, by the air that I breathe, by the water that I drink, I shall never bear reproach concerning this discourse." There are three treatises written by Pythagoras: On Education, On Politics, and On Nature;

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 8.1.1ἔνιοι δʼ υἱὸν μὲν εἶναι

    An accusative and infinitive construction in indirect discourse where the governing verb of speaking (e.g., φασί) is omitted and understood from context. The subsequent infinitive συστῆναι in 8.1.2 continues this same reported discourse.

  2. 8.1.4ὡς εἴη ποτὲ γεγονὼς Αἰθαλίδης καὶ Ἑρμοῦ υἱὸς νομισθείη· τὸν δὲ Ἑρμῆν εἰπεῖν αὐτῷ

    In the indirect discourse, after secondary optatives of reported speech (εἴη γεγονώς, νομισθείη) are used in the dependent clause, the syntax switches back to the infinitive (εἰπεῖν) for the main narrative sequence. This illustrates a typical shift within nested indirect discourse.

  3. 8.1.5διασεσηπυῖαν ἤδη, μόνον δὲ διαμένον τὸ ἐλεφάντινον πρόσωπον

    διασεσηπυῖαν is an accusative perfect participle agreeing with the relative pronoun ἣν and its antecedent ἀσπίδα, functioning predicatively ("the shield, which was already rotten"). The subsequent phrase διαμένον τὸ ἐλεφάντινον πρόσωπον functions either as an accusative absolute or an appositional participial clause denoting attendant circumstance ("with only the ivory face remaining").

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:8.1.1-8.1.6