- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:7.1.51-7.1.55
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-09-28
The divisions of Stoic impression and modes of conception are explained alongside views on the criterion of truth, followed by the definition and properties of voice as the introductory topic of dialectic.
Τῶν δὲ φαντασιῶν κατʼ αὐτοὺς αἱ μέν εἰσιν αἰσθητικαί, αἱ δʼ οὔ· αἰσθητικαὶ μὲν αἱ διʼ αἰσθητηρίου ἢ αἰσθητηρίων λαμβανόμεναι, οὐκ αἰσθητικαὶ δʼ αἱ διὰ τῆς διανοίας καθάπερ τῶν ἀσωμάτων καὶ τῶν ἄλλων τῶν λόγῳ λαμβανομένων. τῶν δὲ αἰσθητικῶν 〈αἱ μὲν〉 ἀπὸ ὑπαρχόντων μετʼ εἴξεως καὶ συγκαταθέσεως γίνονται1. εἰσὶ δὲ τῶν φαντασιῶν καὶ ἐμφάσεις αἱ ὡσανεὶ ἀπὸ ὑπαρχόντων γινόμεναι. Ἔτι τῶν φαντασιῶν αἱ μέν εἰσι λογικαί, αἱ δὲ ἄλογοι· λογικαὶ μὲν αἱ τῶν λογικῶν ζῴων, ἄλογοι δὲ αἱ τῶν ἀλόγων. αἱ μὲν οὖν λογικαὶ νοήσεις εἰσίν, αἱ δʼ ἄλογοι οὐ τετυχήκασιν ὀνόματος. καὶ αἱ μέν εἰσι τεχνικαί, αἱ δὲ ἄτεχνοι· ἄλλως γοῦν θεωρεῖται ὑπὸ τεχνίτου εἰκὼν καὶ ἄλλως ὑπὸ ἀτέχνου.
Of impressions, according to them, some are sensory and others are not: sensory are those received through a sense organ or sense organs, and non-sensory are those received through the intellect, such as those of incorporeals and of other things received by reason. Of the sensory impressions, 〈some〉 arise from what exists, accompanied by yielding and assent. There are also among impressions appearances which arise as if from what exists. Furthermore, of impressions some are rational and others irrational: rational are those of rational animals, and irrational are those of irrational animals. The rational ones, then, are thoughts, while the irrational ones have obtained no name. And some are technical, while others are non-technical; at any rate, a picture is viewed in one way by a craftsman and in another way by a layman.
Αἴσθησις δὲ λέγεται κατὰ τοὺς Στωικοὺς τό τʼ ἀφʼ ἡγεμονικοῦ πνεῦμα ἐπὶ τὰς αἰσθήσεις διῆκον καὶ ἡ διʼ αὐτῶν κατάληψις καὶ ἡ περὶ τὰ αἰσθητήρια κατασκευή, καθʼ ἥν τινες πηροὶ γίνονται. καὶ ἡ ἐνέργεια δὲ αἴσθησις καλεῖται. ἡ δὲ κατάληψις γίνεται κατʼ αὐτοὺς αἰσθήσει μὲν λευκῶν καὶ μελάνων καὶ τραχέων καὶ λείων, λόγῳ δὲ τῶν διʼ ἀποδείξεως συναγομένων, ὥσπερ τοῦ θεοὺς εἶναι, καὶ προνοεῖν τούτους2. τῶν γὰρ νοουμένων τὰ μὲν κατὰ περίπτωσιν ἐνοήθη, τὰ δὲ καθʼ ὁμοιότητα, τὰ δὲ κατʼ ἀναλογίαν, τὰ δὲ κατὰ μετάθεσιν, τὰ δὲ κατὰ σύνθεσιν, τὰ δὲ κατʼ ἐναντίωσιν.
Sensation is spoken of by the Stoics as the breath extending from the ruling part to the senses, and as the comprehension achieved through them, and as the constitution regarding the sense organs according to which some people become disabled. The activity itself is also called sensation. Comprehension, according to them, arises by sensation in the case of white and black, rough and smooth, but by reason in the case of conclusions drawn through demonstration, such as that gods exist and that they exercise providence. For of the things conceived, some were conceived by direct encounter, others by similarity, others by analogy, others by transposition, others by composition, and others by contrariety.
Κατὰ περίπτωσιν μὲν οὖν ἐνοήθη τὰ αἰσθητά· καθʼ ὁμοιότητα δὲ τὰ ἀπό τινος παρακειμένου, ὡς Σωκράτης ἀπὸ τῆς εἰκόνος· κατʼ ἀναλογίαν δὲ αὐξητικῶς μέν, ὡς ὁ Τιτυὸς καὶ Κύκλωψ· μειωτικῶς δέ, ὡς ὁ Πυγμαῖος. καὶ τὸ κέντρον δὲ τῆς γῆς κατʼ ἀναλογίαν ἐνοήθη ἀπὸ τῶν μικροτέρων σφαιρῶν. κατὰ μετάθεσιν δέ, οἷον ὀφθαλμοὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ στήθους· κατὰ σύνθεσιν δὲ ἐνοήθη Ἱπποκένταυρος· καὶ κατʼ ἐναντίωσιν θάνατος. νοεῖται δὲ καὶ κατὰ μετάβασίν τινα, ὡς τὰ λεκτὰ καὶ ὁ τόπος. φυσικῶς δὲ νοεῖται δίκαιόν τι καὶ ἀγαθόν· καὶ κατὰ στέρησιν, οἷον ἄχειρ. τοιάδε τινὰ καὶ περὶ φαντασίας καὶ αἰσθήσεως καὶ νοήσεως δογματίζουσι.
By direct encounter, then, sensible things were conceived; by similarity, things derived from something at hand, as Socrates is conceived from his portrait; by analogy, either augmentatively, as Tityos and the Cyclops, or diminutively, as the Pygmy. The center of the earth, too, was conceived by analogy from smaller spheres. By transposition, for example, eyes upon the chest; by composition, the Centaur was conceived; and by contrariety, death. Conception also takes place by a kind of transition, as in the case of things expressible and space. Something just and good is conceived naturally; and by privation, for instance, a man without hands. Such are the doctrines they hold concerning impression, sensation, and thought.
Κριτήριον δὲ τῆς ἀληθείας φασὶ τυγχάνειν τὴν καταληπτικὴν φαντασίαν, τουτέστι τὴν ἀπὸ ὑπάρχοντος, καθά φησι Χρύσιππος ἐν τῇ δυωδεκάτῃ τῶν Φυσικῶν καὶ Ἀντίπατρος καὶ Ἀπολλόδωρος. ὁ μὲν γὰρ Βόηθος κριτήρια πλείονα ἀπολείπει, νοῦν καὶ αἴσθησιν καὶ ὄρεξιν καὶ ἐπιστήμην· ὁ δὲ Χρύσιππος διαφερόμενος πρὸς αὑτὸν ἐν τῷ πρώτῳ Περὶ λόγου κριτήριά φησιν εἶναι αἴσθησιν καὶ πρόληψιν· ἔστι δʼ ἡ πρόληψις ἔννοια φυσικὴ τῶν καθόλου. ἄλλοι δέ τινες τῶν ἀρχαιοτέρων Στωικῶν τὸν ὀρθὸν λόγον κριτήριον ἀπολείπουσιν, ὡς ὁ Ποσειδώνιος ἐν τῷ Περὶ κριτηρίου φησί.
They say that cognitive impression—that is, the one arising from what exists—is the criterion of truth, as Chrysippus says in the twelfth book of his Physics, and Antipater and Apollodorus. For Boethus leaves multiple criteria: intellect, sensation, desire, and knowledge; while Chrysippus, disagreeing with himself, says in the first book of On Reason that the criteria are sensation and preconception; and a preconception is a natural conception of universals. Some others of the older Stoics leave right reason as the criterion, as Posidonius says in On the Criterion.
Τῆς δὲ διαλεκτικῆς θεωρίας συμφώνως δοκεῖ τοῖς πλείστοις ἀπὸ τοῦ περὶ φωνῆς ἐνάρχεσθαι τόπου. ἔστι δὲ φωνὴ ἀὴρ πεπληγμένος ἢ τὸ ἴδιον αἰσθητὸν ἀκοῆς, ὥς φησι Διογένης ὁ Βαβυλώνιος ἐν τῇ Περὶ φωνῆς τέχνῃ. ζῴου μέν ἐστι φωνὴ ἀὴρ ὑπὸ ὁρμῆς πεπληγμένος, ἀνθρώπου δʼ ἔστιν ἔναρθρος καὶ ἀπὸ διανοίας ἐκπεμπομένη, ὡς ὁ Διογένης φησίν, ἥτις ἀπὸ δεκατεσσάρων ἐτῶν τελειοῦται3. καὶ σῶμα δʼ ἐστὶν ἡ φωνὴ κατὰ τοὺς Στωικούς, ὥς φησιν Ἀρχέδημός τʼ ἐν τῇ Περὶ φωνῆς καὶ Διογένης καὶ Ἀντίπατρος καὶ Χρύσιππος ἐν τῇ δευτέρᾳ τῶν Φυσικῶν.
It is agreed by most that the study of dialectic begins from the topic concerning voice. And voice is air that has been struck, or the proper sensible object of hearing, as Diogenes of Babylon says in his Art of Voice. The voice of an animal is air struck by an impulse, but that of a human being is articulate and emitted from the intellect, as Diogenes says, which reaches maturity from the age of fourteen. And voice is also a body according to the Stoics, as Archedemus says in On Voice, and Diogenes, Antipater, and Chrysippus in the second book of his Physics.
- 7.1.51τῶν δὲ αἰσθητικῶν 〈αἱ μὲν〉 ἀπὸ ὑπαρχόντων μετʼ εἴξεως καὶ συγκαταθέσεως γίνονται
The bracketed 〈αἱ μὲν〉 is an editorial supplement forming a contrast with the subsequent clause εἰσὶ δὲ τῶν φαντασιῶν καὶ ἐμφάσεις. The genitive τῶν αἰσθητικῶν functions as a partitive genitive, distinguishing impressions that arise from actual objects accompanied by surrender and assent from mere appearances that arise as if from what exists.
- 7.1.52ὥσπερ τοῦ θεοὺς εἶναι, καὶ προνοεῖν τούτους
The articular infinitive construction with τοῦ followed by the accusative and infinitives (θεοὺς εἶναι, καὶ προνοεῖν τούτους) stands in apposition to the preceding neuter plural genitive participle phrase τῶν διʼ ἀποδείξεως συναγομένων ('things deduced through demonstration'), providing concrete examples of propositional content deduced by reason.
- 7.1.55ἥτις ἀπὸ δεκατεσσάρων ἐτῶν τελειοῦται
The relative pronoun ἥτις refers back to human voice (ἀνθρώπου [φωνή]). The prepositional phrase ἀπὸ δεκατεσσάρων ἐτῶν denotes the temporal starting point or age ('from the age of fourteen'), indicating the traditional Stoic milestone for the maturation of rationality and fully articulate speech.
