← Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§4.6.28-4.6.34

Origins, Education, and Academy Leadership of Arcesilaus

The passage recounts the origin, education, and philosophical training of Arcesilaus (under Autolycus, Theophrastus, and Crantor), his poetry, his accession as head of the Academy, and his characteristic philosophical wit and style.

← PrevNext →

Ἀρκεσίλαος Σεύθου 〈[ἢ Σκύθου], ὡς Ἀπολλόδωρος ἐν τρίτῳ Χρονικῶν〉, Πιτάνης τῆς Αἰολίδος. οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ τῆς μέσης Ἀκαδημείας κατάρξας, πρῶτος ἐπισχὼν τὰς ἀποφάσεις διὰ τὰς ἐναντιότητας τῶν λόγων. πρῶτος δὲ καὶ εἰς ἑκάτερον ἐπεχείρησε, καὶ πρῶτος τὸν λόγον ἐκίνησε τὸν ὑπὸ Πλάτωνος παραδεδομένον καὶ ἐποίησε διʼ ἐρωτήσεως καὶ ἀποκρίσεως ἐριστικώτερον. παρέβαλε δὲ Κράντορι τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον. τέταρτος ἀδελφὸς ἦν ὧν εἶχε δύο μὲν ὁμοπατρίους, δύο δὲ ὁμομητρίους1· καὶ τῶν μὲν ὁμομητρίων πρεσβύτερον Πυλάδην, τῶν δὲ ὁμοπατρίων Μοιρέαν, ὃς ἦν αὐτῷ ἐπίτροπος.

​Arcesilaus was the son of Seuthes (or Scythes, as Apollodorus says in the third book of the Chronicles), and came from Pitane in Aeolis. He was the founder of the Middle Academy, being the first to suspend judgment on account of the contrariety of arguments. He was also the first to argue on both sides of a question, and the first to modify the method of discourse handed down by Plato, making it more eristic by means of question and answer. He attached himself to Crantor in the following manner. He had four brothers, of whom two were by the same father and two by the same mother; and of those by the same mother Pylades was the elder, while of those by the same father Moireas was the elder, and this Moireas was his guardian.

ἤκουσε δὲ κατʼ ἀρχὰς μὲν Αὐτολύκου τοῦ μαθηματικοῦ πολίτου τυγχάνοντος, πρὶν ἀπαίρειν εἰς Ἀθήνας, μεθʼ οὗ καὶ εἰς Σάρδεις ἀπεδήμησεν· ἔπειτα Ξάνθου τοῦ Ἀθηναίου μουσικοῦ· μεθʼ ὃν Θεοφράστου διήκουσεν. ἔπειτα μετῆλθεν εἰς Ἀκαδημείαν πρὸς Κράντορα· Μοιρέας μὲν γὰρ ὁ προειρημένος ἀδελφὸς ἦγεν αὐτὸν ἐπὶ ῥητορικήν· ὁ δὲ φιλοσοφίας ἤρα, καὶ αὐτοῦ Κράντωρ ἐρωτικῶς διατεθεὶς ἐπύθετο τὰ ἐξ Ἀνδρομέδας Εὐριπίδου προενεγκάμενος· "ὦ παρθένʼ, εἰ σώσαιμί σʼ, εἴσει μοι χάριν;" καὶ ὃς τὰ ἐχόμενα· "ἄγου μʼ, ὦ ξένʼ, εἴτε δμωΐδʼ ἐθέλεις εἴτʼ ἄλοχον."

​At first, before departing for Athens, he studied under his fellow citizen Autolycus the mathematician, with whom he also travelled abroad to Sardis; next he studied under Xanthus of Athens, the musician; and after him he heard Theophrastus. He then migrated to the Academy to study under Crantor. For his aforementioned brother Moireas was trying to direct him toward rhetoric; but Arcesilaus was in love with philosophy, and Crantor, having fallen in love with him, inquired of him by reciting these lines from Euripides’ Andromeda: “Maiden, if I should save you, will you show me gratitude?” And Arcesilaus replied with what follows: “Take me, stranger, whether you wish me as a servant or as a wife.”

ἐκ τούτου συνήστην ἀλλήλοιν· ἵνα καὶ τὸν Θεόφραστον κνιζόμενόν φασιν εἰπεῖν ὡς εὐφυὴς καὶ εὐεπιχείρητος ἀπεληλυθὼς τῆς διατριβῆς εἴη νεανίσκος2. καὶ γὰρ ἐν τοῖς λόγοις ἐμβριθέστατος καὶ φιλογράμματος ἱκανῶς γενόμενος ἥπτετο καὶ ποιητικῆς. καὶ αὐτοῦ φέρεται ἐπίγραμμα εἰς Ἄτταλον ἔχον οὕτω· "Πέργαμος οὐχ ὅπλοις κλεινὴ μόνον, ἀλλὰ καὶ ἵπποις πολλάκις αὐδᾶται Πῖσαν ἀνὰ ζαθέην. εἰ δὲ τὸν ἐκ Διόθεν θεμιτὸν θνατῷ νόον εἰπεῖν, ἔσσεται εἰσαῦτις πολλὸν ἀοιδοτέρη." ἀλλὰ καὶ εἰς Μηνόδωρον τὸν Εὐγάμου ἑνὸς τῶν συσχολαστῶν ἐρώμενον·

​From that time on they lived together; so that they say even Theophrastus, feeling aggrieved, remarked what a talented and quick-witted young man had departed from his school. For in his discussions he was most weighty, and having become sufficiently fond of letters, he also took up poetry. An epigram of his addressed to Attalus is preserved, running thus: “Pergamum is renowned not only for arms, but also for steeds, as is often proclaimed throughout sacred Pisa. And if it is lawful for a mortal to speak the mind sent from Zeus, she will hereafter be far more sung in song.” And there is also an epigram addressed to Menodorus, the beloved of Eugamus, one of his fellow students:

"τηλοῦ μὲν Φρυγίη, τηλοῦ δʼ ἱερὴ Θυάτειρα· ὦ Μηνόδωρε, σὴ πατρίς, Καδανάδη. ἀλλὰ γὰρ εἰς Ἀχέροντα τὸν οὐ φατὸν ἶσα κέλευθα, ὡς αἶνος ἀνδρῶν, πάντοθεν μετρεύμενα. σῆμα δέ τοι τόδʼ ἔρεξεν ἀριφραδὲς Εὔγαμος, ᾧ σὺ πολλῶν πενεστέων ἦσθα προσφιλέστατος." Ἀπεδέχετο δὲ πάντων μᾶλλον Ὅμηρον, οὗ καὶ εἰς ὕπνον ἰὼν πάντως τι ἀνεγίνωσκεν, ἀλλὰ καὶ ὄρθρου λέγων ἐπὶ τὸν ἐρώμενον ἀπιέναι ὁπότε βούλοιτο ἀναγνῶναι. τόν τε Πίνδαρον ἔφασκε δεινὸν εἶναι φωνῆς ἐμπλῆσαι καὶ ὀνομάτων καὶ ῥημάτων εὐπορίαν παρασχεῖν. Ἴωνα δὲ καὶ ἐχαρακτήριζε νέος ὤν.

“Far away is Phrygia, and far away holy Thyateira, O Menodorus, and Cadanada, your homeland. Yet the roads to the unspeakable Acheron are equal, as the saying of men goes, measured from every quarter. And Eugamus erected for you this conspicuous monument, to whom you were the dearest of many humble servants.” He admired Homer above all, from whom he would unfailingly read something before going to sleep, and also in the morning he would say that he was going off to his beloved whenever he wished to read him. Pindar too he declared to be admirable for filling out the voice and furnishing a copiousness of nouns and verbs. In his youth he also used to imitate the style of Ion.

Διήκουσε δὲ καὶ Ἱππονίκου τοῦ γεωμέτρου· ὃν καὶ ἔσκωψε τὰ μὲν ἄλλα νωθρὸν ὄντα καὶ χασμώδη, ἐν δὲ τῇ τέχνῃ τεθεωρημένον, εἰπὼν τὴν γεωμετρίαν αὐτοῦ χάσκοντος εἰς τὸ στόμα ἐμπτῆναι. τοῦτον καὶ παρακόψαντα ἀναλαβὼν οἴκοι ἐς τοσοῦτον ἐθεράπευσεν, ἐς ὅσον ἀποκαταστῆσαι. Κράτητος δὲ ἐκλιπόντος κατέσχε τὴν σχολήν, ἐκχωρήσαντος αὐτῷ Σωκρατίδου τινός. διὰ δὲ τὸ περὶ πάντων ἐπέχειν οὐδὲ βιβλίον, φασί τινες, συνέγραψεν· οἱ δέ, ὅτι ἐφωράθη 〈Κράντοροσ〉 τινὰ διορθῶν, ἅ φασιν οἱ μὲν ἐκδοῦναι, οἱ δὲ κατακαῦσαι. ἐῴκει δὴ θαυμάζειν καὶ τὸν Πλάτωνα καὶ τὰ βιβλία ἐκέκτητο αὐτοῦ.

​He also studied under Hipponicus the geometer, whom he mocked as being in other respects sluggish and constantly yawning, but accomplished in his craft, saying that geometry had flown into his mouth while he was gaping. When this man lost his wits, Arcesilaus took him into his own home and cared for him until he restored him to health. Upon the death of Crates, he took over the headship of the school, after a certain Socratides had yielded the place to him. Some say that on account of his suspending judgment on all matters he did not write even a single book; others, however, say that he was caught revising certain writings of Crantor, which some say he published, while others say he burned them. He seemed indeed to admire Plato, and he possessed his books.

ἀλλὰ καὶ τὸν Πύρρωνα κατά τινας ἐζηλώκει καὶ τῆς διαλεκτικῆς εἴχετο καὶ τῶν Ερετρικῶν ἥπτετο λόγων, ὅθεν καὶ ἐλέγετο ἐπʼ αὐτοῦ ὑπʼ Ἀρίστωνος· "πρόσθε Πλάτων, ὄπιθεν Πύρρων, μέσσος Διόδωρος3." καὶ ὁ Τίμων ἐπʼ αὐτοῦ φησιν οὕτως· "τῇ γὰρ ἔχων Μενεδήμου ὑπὸ στέρνοισι μόλιβδον θεύσεται ἢ Πύρρωνα τὸ πᾶν κρέας ἢ Διόδωρον." καὶ διαλιπὼν αὐτὸν ποιεῖ λέγοντα· "νήξομαι εἰς Πύρρωνα καὶ εἰς σκολιὸν Διόδωρον." Ἦν δὲ καὶ ἀξιωματικώτατος καὶ συνηγμένος καὶ ἐν τῇ λαλιᾷ διαστατικὸς τῶν ὀνομάτων, ἐπικόπτης θʼ ἱκανῶς καὶ παρρησιαστής·

​Yet according to some he also emulated Pyrrho, and clung to dialectic, and dabbled in the Eretrian arguments; whence Ariston used to say of him: “Plato in front, Pyrrho behind, Diodorus in the middle.” And Timon speaks of him in this way: “For holding the lead of Menedemus beneath his breast, he will run with his whole carcase either to Pyrrho or to Diodorus.” And after an interval he makes him say: “I will swim to Pyrrho and to crooked Diodorus.” He was also a man of great dignity, collected, and distinctive in articulating words in speech, as well as a sharp critic and an outspoken speaker;

διὸ καὶ πάλιν ὁ Τίμων οὑτωσὶ περὶ αὐτοῦ· "καὶ * νόον αἱμυλίοις ἐπιπλήξεσιν ἐγκαταμιγνύς." ὅθεν καὶ πρὸς τὸν θρασύτερον διαλεγόμενον νεανίσκον, οὐ λήψεταί τις, ἔφη, τοῦτον ἀστραγάλῳ; πρὸς δὲ τὸν αἰτίαν ἔχοντα περαίνεσθαι, ὡς ἀνήνεγκεν αὐτῷ ὅτι οὐ δοκεῖ ἕτερον ἕτερου μεῖζον εἶναι, ἠρώτησεν εἰ οὐδὲ τὸ δεκαδάκτυλον τοῦ ἑξαδακτύλου. Ἥμονος δέ τινος Χίου ἀειδοῦς ὄντος καὶ ὑπολαμβάνοντος εἶναι καλοῦ καὶ ἐν χλανίσιν ἀεὶ ἀναστρεφομένου εἰπόντος ὅτι οὐ δοκεῖ αὐτῷ 〈ὁ〉 σοφὸς ἐρασθήσεσθαι, ἔφη, πότερον οὐδʼ ἐὰν οὕτω καλὸς ᾖ τις ὥσπερ σὺ οὐδʼ ἐὰν οὕτω καλὰ ἱμάτια ἔχῃ; ἐπεὶ δὲ καὶ παρακίναιδος ὢν ὡς εἰς βαρὺν τὸν Ἀρκεσίλαον ἔφη·

​wherefore Timon again writes concerning him thus: “and blending his mind with enticing reproaches.” Hence, to a youth who was arguing rather rashly, he said, “Will someone not take this fellow with a knuckle-bone?” And to one who had the reputation of submitting to passive sodomy, when that man brought the objection against him that one thing does not seem to be greater than another, he asked whether a thing of ten fingers did not seem greater than one of six. And when a certain Hemon of Chios, who was unsightly yet supposed himself to be handsome and always walked about in delicate cloaks, asserted that in his view the wise man will not fall in love, Arcesilaus asked, “Not even if someone is as handsome as you, nor even if he wears such fine garments?” And when this same man, being a catamite, spoke against Arcesilaus as being an overbearing person—

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 4.6.28τέταρτος ἀδελφὸς ἦν ὧν εἶχε δύο μὲν ὁμοπατρίους, δύο δὲ ὁμομητρίους

    While τέταρτος ἀδελφὸς ἦν could grammatically be taken as 'he was one of four brothers' (inclusive), the subsequent relative clause ὧν εἶχε ('of whom he had two by the same father and two by the same mother', making four in total besides himself) indicates that he possessed four brothers (five sons in total). Thus τέταρτος is understood here in relation to the four brothers mentioned, meaning 'he had four brothers'.

  2. 4.6.30ἵνα καὶ τὸν Θεόφραστον κνιζόμενόν φασιν εἰπεῖν ὡς εὐφυὴς καὶ εὐεπιχείρητος ἀπεληλυθὼς τῆς διατριβῆς εἴη νεανίσκος

    The conjunction ἵνα, which classically expresses purpose, is here used in its Hellenistic sense to indicate result ('so that', equivalent to ὥστε). In the indirect speech introduced by ὡς, the verb εἴη is an oblique optative representing Theophrastus' original exclamation/statement in the past framework.

  3. 4.6.33πρόσθε Πλάτων, ὄπιθεν Πύρρων, μέσσος Διόδωρος

    A parody of Homer, Iliad 6.181, describing the Chimera: 'lion in front, snake behind, goat in the middle' (πρόσθε λέων, ὄπιθεν δὲ δράκων, μέσση δὲ χίμαιρα). It satirizes Arcesilaus' chimerical philosophical stance: Platonic in outward method, Pyrrhonian in skepticism, and utilizing Diodorus Cronus' dialectic in between.

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:4.6.28-4.6.34