- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:3.1.61-3.1.66
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-09-24
The passage details Plato's Epistles, the trilogic arrangement by Aristophanes the grammarian, diverse reading orders, and spurious dialogues, followed by Plato's varied vocabulary and paradoxical expressions, his threefold mode of textual interpretation, the critical signs affixed to his manuscripts, and their early circulation.
ἐν αἷς ἔγραφεν εὖ πράττειν1, Ἐπίκουρος δὲ εὖ διάγειν, Κλέων χαίρειν — πρὸς Ἀριστόδημον μία, πρὸς Ἀρχύταν δύο, πρὸς Διονύσιον τέτταρες, πρὸς Ἑρμίαν καὶ Ἔραστον καὶ Κορίσκον μία, πρὸς Λεωδάμαντα μία, πρὸς Δίωνα μία, πρὸς Περδίκκαν μία, πρὸς τοὺς Δίωνος οἰκείους δύο. καὶ οὗτος μὲν οὕτω διαιρεῖ καί τινες. Ἔνιοι δέ, ὧν ἐστι καὶ Ἀριστοφάνης ὁ γραμματικός, εἰς τριλογίας ἕλκουσι τοὺς διαλόγους,
in which letters he used to write 'Prosper', whereas Epicurus wrote 'Live well' and Cleon 'Rejoice'—one to Aristodemus, two to Archytas, four to Dionysius, one to Hermias, Erastus, and Coriscus, one to Leodamas, one to Dion, one to Perdiccas, and two to the relatives of Dion. He (Thrasyllus) and certain others divide them in this way. But some, among whom is also Aristophanes the grammarian, arrange the dialogues into trilogies,
καὶ πρώτην μὲν τιθέασιν ἧς ἡγεῖται Πολιτεία Τίμαιος Κριτίας· δευτέραν Σοφιστὴς Πολιτικὸς Κρατύλος· τρίτην Νόμοι Μίνως Ἐπινομίς· τετάρτην Θεαίτητος Εὐθύφρων Ἀπολογία· πέμπτην Κρίτων Φαίδων Ἐπιστολαί. τὰ δʼ ἄλλα καθʼ ἓν καὶ ἀτάκτως. ἄρχονται δὲ οἱ μέν, ὡς προείρηται, ἀπὸ τῆς Πολιτείας· οἱ δʼ ἀπὸ Ἀλκιβιάδου τοῦ μείζονος· οἱ δʼ ἀπὸ Θεάγους· ἔνιοι δὲ Εὐθύφρονος· ἄλλοι Κλειτοφῶντος· τινὲς Τιμαίου· οἱ δʼ ἀπὸ Φαίδρου· ἕτεροι Θεαιτήτου· πολλοὶ δὲ 〈ἀπʼ〉 Ἀπολογίας τὴν ἀρχὴν ποιοῦνται. νοθεύονται δὲ τῶν διαλόγων ὁμολογουμένως Μίδων ἢ Ἱπποτρόφος, Ἐρυξίας ἢ Ἐρασίστρατος, Ἀλκύων, Ἀκέφαλοι ἢ Σίσυφος, Ἀξίοχος, Φαίακες, Δημόδοκος, Χελιδών, Ἑβδόμη, Ἐπιμενίδης· ὧν ἡ Ἀλκυὼν Λέοντός τινος εἶναι δοκεῖ, καθά φησι Φαβωρῖνος ἐν τῷ πέμπτῳ τῶν Ἀπομνημονευμάτων.
and they place first that which is headed by Republic, Timaeus, Critias; second, Sophist, Statesman, Cratylus; third, Laws, Minos, Epinomis; fourth, Theaetetus, Euthyphro, Apology; fifth, Crito, Phaedo, Epistles. The rest they arrange individually and without fixed order. And some, as was previously said, begin with the Republic; others with the Greater Alcibiades; others with Theages; some with Euthyphro; others with Clitophon; some with Timaeus; others with Phaedrus; still others with Theaetetus; and many make their beginning from the Apology. The dialogues recognized by common consent to be spurious are: Midon or The Horse Breeder, Eryxias or Erasistratus, Halcyon, The Headless Ones or Sisyphus, Axiochus, Phaeacians, Demodocus, Swallow, Seventh, Epimenides; of which the Halcyon seems to be the work of a certain Leon, just as Favorinus says in the fifth book of his Memorabilia.
Ὀνόμασι δὲ κέχρηται ποικίλοις πρὸς τὸ μὴ εὐσύνοπτον εἶναι τοῖς ἀμαθέσι τὴν πραγματείαν2· ἰδιαίτατα μὲν σοφίαν ἡγεῖται εἶναι τὴν τῶν νοητῶν καὶ ὄντως ὄντων ἐπιστήμην, ἥν φησι περὶ θεὸν καὶ ψυχὴν σώματος κεχωρισμένην. ἰδίᾳ δὲ σοφίαν καὶ τὴν φιλοσοφίαν καλεῖ, ὄρεξιν οὖσαν τῆς θείας σοφίας. κοινῶς δὲ λέγεται παρʼ αὐτῷ σοφία καὶ ἡ πᾶσα ἐμπειρία, οἷον ὅταν σοφὸν λέγῃ τὸν δημιουργόν. χρῆται δὲ καὶ ἐπὶ διαφερόντως σημαινομένων τοῖς αὐτοῖς ὀνόμασιν. ὁ γοῦν φαῦλος λέγεται παρʼ αὐτῷ καὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ ἁπλοῦ, ὡς καὶ παρὰ Εὐριπίδῃ ἐν Λικυμνίῳ φέρεται ἐπὶ τοῦ Ἡρακλέους οὑτωσί· "φαῦλον, ἄκομψον, τὰ μέγιστʼ ἀγαθόν, πᾶσαν ἐν ἔργῳ περιταμνόμενον σοφίαν, λέσχης ἀτρίβωνα."
He uses a variety of terms in order that his treatise may not be easily surveyed by the unlearned: in the most proper sense he considers 'wisdom' to be the science of the intelligible and truly existing things, which he says is concerned with God and the soul separated from the body; but in a specific sense he also calls philosophy 'wisdom', it being an yearning for divine wisdom; and in a general sense all practical experience is also called 'wisdom' by him, as when he calls the artisan 'wise'. He also uses the same words for differently signified things. At any rate, the word 'simple' (phaulos) is used by him even in the sense of the 'plain' or 'artless', just as in Euripides in the Licymnius it is applied to Heracles in this way: 'Simple, unadorned, noble in the highest degree, curtailing in action all wisdom, unskilled in idle talk.'
χρῆται δὲ ὁ Πλάτων ἐνίοτε αὐτῷ καὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ κακοῦ· ἔστι δʼ ὅτε καὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ μικροῦ. πολλάκις δὲ καὶ διαφέρουσιν ὀνόμασιν ἐπὶ τοῦ αὐτοῦ σημαινομένου χρῆται. τὴν γοῦν ἰδέαν καὶ εἶδος ὀνομάζει καὶ γένος καὶ παράδειγμα καὶ ἀρχὴν καὶ αἴτιον. χρῆται δὲ καὶ ταῖς ἐναντίαις φωναῖς ἐπὶ τοῦ αὐτοῦ. τὸ γοῦν αἰσθητὸν καὶ ὂν καλεῖ καὶ μὴ ὄν· ὂν μὲν διὰ τὸ γένεσιν αὐτοῦ εἶναι, μὴ ὂν δὲ διὰ τὴν συνεχῆ μεταβολήν. καὶ τὴν ἰδέαν οὔτε κινούμενον οὔτε μένον3· καὶ ταὐτὸ καὶ ἓν καὶ πολλά. τὸ δʼ αὐτὸ καὶ ἐπὶ πλειόνων εἴθισται ποιεῖν.
Yet Plato sometimes also uses it in the sense of 'bad', and there are times when he uses it for 'small'. Often, too, he uses different words for the same signified thing. For example, the Idea he calls 'form' (eidos), 'genus' (genos), 'paradigm' (paradeigma), 'principle' (arche), and 'cause' (aition). He also uses contrary expressions for the same thing. At any rate, what is sensible he calls both 'being' and 'not-being': 'being' because of its having becoming, and 'not-being' because of its continuous change. And the Idea he calls 'neither moving nor at rest', and 'the same', and 'one and many'. And he is accustomed to do the same thing in the case of several other topics as well.
Ἔστι δὲ ἡ ἐξήγησις αὐτοῦ τῶν λόγων τριπλῆ· πρῶτον μὲν γὰρ ἐκδιδάξαι χρὴ ὅ τι ἐστὶν ἕκαστον τῶν λεγομένων· ἔπειτα, τίνος εἵνεκα λέλεκται, πότερα κατὰ προηγούμενον ἢ ἐν εἰκόνος μέρει, καὶ 〈εἰ〉 εἰς δογμάτων κατασκευὴν ἢ εἰς ἔλεγχον τοῦ προσδιαλεγομένου· τὸ δὲ τρίτον, εἰ ὀρθῶς λέλεκται. Ἐπεὶ δὲ καὶ σημεῖά τινα τοῖς βιβλίοις αὐτοῦ παρατίθενται, φέρε καὶ περὶ τούτων τι εἴπωμεν. Χῖ λαμβάνεται πρὸς τὰς λέξεις καὶ τὰ σχήματα καὶ ὅλως τὴν Πλατωνικὴν συνήθειαν· διπλῆ πρὸς τὰ δόγματα καὶ τὰ ἀρέσκοντα Πλάτωνι·
The interpretation of his discourses is threefold: for first, one must explain what each of the things said is; then, for what purpose it was said, whether in a primary sense or by way of an image, and whether for establishing doctrines or for refuting an interlocutor; and thirdly, whether it has been correctly said. Moreover, since certain critical marks are also affixed to his books, come, let us say something concerning these as well. The Chi (Χ) is adopted for the diction, the figures of speech, and in general the Platonic usage; the Diple (›) for the doctrines and the opinions approved by Plato;
Χῖ περιεστιγμένον πρὸς τὰς ἐκλογὰς καὶ καλλιγραφίας· διπλῆ περιεστιγμένη πρὸς τὰς ἐνίων διορθώσεις· ὀβελὸς περιεστιγμένος πρὸς τὰς εἰκαίους ἀθετήσεις· ἀντίσιγμα περιεστιγμένον πρὸς τὰς διττὰς χρήσεις καὶ μεταθέσεις τῶν γραφῶν· κεραύνιον πρὸς τὴν ἀγωγὴν τῆς φιλοσοφίας· ἀστερίσκος πρὸς τὴν συμφωνίαν τῶν δογμάτων· ὀβελὸς πρὸς τὴν ἀθέτησιν. τὰ μὲν σημεῖα ταῦτα καὶ τὰ βιβλία τοσαῦτα· ἅπερ Ἀντίγονός φησιν ὁ Καρύστιος ἐν τῷ Περὶ Ζήνωνος νεωστὶ ἐκδοθέντα εἴ τις ἤθελε διαναγνῶναι, μισθὸν ἐτέλει τοῖς κεκτημένοις4.
the dotted Chi for select passages and stylistic beauties; the dotted Diple for the corrections made by some; the dotted Obelos for unwarranted rejections; the dotted Antisigma for double usages and transpositions of readings; the Keraunion for the philosophical school training; the Asterisk for the agreement of doctrines; the Obelos for rejection as spurious. These then are the marks and of such number are the books; which books Antigonus of Carystus says in his Life of Zeno, when newly published, if anyone wished to read them through, he paid a fee to their possessors.
- 3.1.61ἐν αἷς ἔγραφεν εὖ πράττειν
The verb ἔγραφεν governs the greeting formula εὖ πράττειν as its direct complement in quasi-direct speech. In the following clauses (Ἐπίκουρος δὲ εὖ διάγειν, Κλέων χαίρειν), the same verb ἔγραφε(ν) is understood by ellipsis.
- 3.1.63πρὸς τὸ μὴ εὐσύνοπτον εἶναι τοῖς ἀμαθέσι τὴν πραγματείαν
The preposition πρός combined with the articular infinitive (τὸ ... εἶναι) expresses purpose. The subject of the infinitive is the accusative noun phrase τὴν πραγματείαν, with εὐσύνοπτον functioning as predicate adjective, and τοῖς ἀμαθέσι as a dative of reference or person judging ('for/to the unlearned').
- 3.1.64καὶ τὴν ἰδέαν οὔτε κινούμενον οὔτε μένον
The verb καλεῖ ('he calls') is supplied from the preceding sentence, governing the accusative τὴν ἰδέαν as its object and the neuter singular participles οὔτε κινούμενον οὔτε μένον as predicate complements in a double-accusative construction (referring abstractly to the Idea in the neuter). The subsequent words καὶ ταὐτὸ καὶ ἓν καὶ πολλά likewise serve as predicate complements.
- 3.1.66ἅπερ Ἀντίγονός φησιν ὁ Καρύστιος ἐν τῷ Περὶ Ζήνωνος νεωστὶ ἐκδοθέντα εἴ τις ἤθελε διαναγνῶναι, μισθὸν ἐτέλει τοῖς κεκτημένοις
The relative pronoun ἅπερ (neuter plural accusative referring back to τὰ βιβλία in the preceding sentence) is fronted as the direct object of the infinitive διαναγνῶναι inside the conditional clause. The participle νεωστὶ ἐκδοθέντα acts as a temporal participle ('when newly published'). The main framework is Ἀντίγονός φησιν, governing the past general/indicative conditional sentence εἴ τις ἤθελε ... μισθὸν ἐτέλει as reported content.
