Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§3.1.55-3.1.60

Dialectical Induction and Thrasyllus' Nine Tetralogies

The passage explains the dialectical method of induction with an example from the Phaedo, and compares Plato's introduction of dialectic to the historical development of three actors in tragedy. It then sets forth Thrasyllus' classification of Plato's works into nine tetralogies, listing the dialogues along with their dual titles and genres.

← PrevNext →

ῥητορικὸς δʼ ἐστὶν τρόπος τῆς ἐπαγωγῆς οὗτος, ἐπειδὴ καὶ ῥητορικὴ περὶ τὰ ἐπὶ μέρους, οὐ τὰ καθόλου τὴν πραγματείαν ἔχει. ζητεῖ γὰρ οὐ περὶ αὐτοῦ τοῦ δικαίου, ἀλλὰ τῶν ἐπὶ μέρους δικαίων. δὲ ἕτερός ἐστι διαλεκτικός, προαποδειχθέντος τοῦ καθόλου διὰ τῶν ἐπὶ μέρους1. οἷον ζητεῖται, εἰ ψυχὴ ἀθάνατος καὶ εἰ ἐκ τῶν τεθνεώτων οἱ ζῶντες· ὅπερ ἀποδείκνυται ἐν τῷ Περὶ ψυχῆς διά τινος καθολικοῦ, ὅτι ἐκ τῶν ἐναντίων τὰ ἐναντία. καὶ αὐτὸ δὲ τὸ καθόλου κατασκευάζεται ἔκ τινων ὄντων ἐπὶ μέρους· οἷον ὅτι τὸ καθεύδειν ἐκ τοῦ ἐγρηγορέναι καὶ ἀνάπαλιν καὶ τὸ μεῖζον ἐκ τοῦ μικροτέρου καὶ ἀνάπαλιν. τούτῳ δὲ ἐχρῆτο εἰς τὴν τῶν ἑαυτῷ δοκούντων κατασκευήν.

​This method of induction is rhetorical, since rhetoric also conducts its inquiry concerning particulars, not universals; for it inquires not about justice itself, but about particular instances of justice. The other method is dialectical, wherein the universal is demonstrated beforehand through the particulars. For instance, it is inquired whether the soul is immortal, and whether the living come from the dead; and this is demonstrated in the On the Soul through a certain universal proposition, namely that opposites come from opposites. And this universal proposition itself is established from certain existing particulars: for example, that sleeping comes from being awake and vice versa, and the greater from the smaller and vice versa. And he used this method for establishing his own doctrines.

Ὥσπερ δὲ τὸ παλαιὸν ἐν τῇ τραγῳδίᾳ πρότερον μὲν μόνος χορὸς διεδραμάτιζεν, ὕστερον δὲ Θέσπις ἕνα ὑποκριτὴν ἐξεῦρεν ὑπὲρ τοῦ διαναπαύεσθαι τὸν χορὸν καὶ δεύτερον Αἰσχύλος, τὸν δὲ τρίτον Σοφοκλῆς καὶ συνεπλήρωσεν τὴν τραγῳδίαν, οὕτως καὶ τῆς φιλοσοφίας λόγος πρότερον μὲν ἦν μονοειδὴς ὡς φυσικός, δεύτερον δὲ Σωκράτης προσέθηκε τὸν ἠθικόν, τρίτον δὲ Πλάτων τὸν διαλεκτικὸν καὶ ἐτελεσιούργησε τὴν φιλοσοφίαν. Θράσυλος δέ φησι καὶ κατὰ τὴν τραγικὴν τετραλογίαν ἐκδοῦναι αὐτὸν τοὺς διαλόγους, οἷον ἐκεῖνοι τέτρασι δράμασιν ἠγωνίζοντο2Διονυσίοις, Ληναίοις, Παναθηναίοις, Χύτροιςὧν τὸ τέταρτον ἦν Σατυρικόν· τὰ δὲ τέτταρα δράματα ἐκαλεῖτο τετραλογία.

​Just as anciently in tragedy, at first the chorus alone performed the drama, but later Thespis invented a single actor in order to give the chorus a rest, and Aeschylus a second, and Sophocles a third, thereby bringing tragedy to its completion, so also the discourse of philosophy was at first of a single kind, namely physical, but secondarily Socrates added the ethical, and thirdly Plato added the dialectical, thus bringing philosophy to perfection. Thrasyllus says that he even published his dialogues according to tragic tetralogy, just as the poets used to compete with four plays—at the Dionysia, Lenaea, Panathenaea, and Chytroi—of which the fourth was a satyr play; and the four plays were called a tetralogy.

Εἰσὶ τοίνυν, φησίν, οἱ πάντες αὐτῷ γνήσιοι διάλογοι ἓξ καὶ πεντήκοντα, τῆς μὲν Πολιτείας εἰς δέκα διαιρουμένηςἣν καὶ εὑρίσκεσθαι σχεδὸν ὅλην παρὰ Πρωταγόρᾳ ἐν τοῖς Ἀντιλογικοῖς φησι Φαβωρῖνος ἐν Παντοδαπῆς ἱστορίας δευτέρῳ -τῶν δὲ Νόμων εἰς δυοκαίδεκα. τετραλογίαι δὲ ἐννέα, ἑνὸς βιβλίου χώραν ἐπεχούσης τῆς Πολιτείας καὶ ἑνὸς τῶν Νόμων3. πρώτην μὲν οὖν τετραλογίαν τίθησι τὴν κοινὴν ὑπόθεσιν ἔχουσαν· παραδεῖξαι γὰρ βούλεται ὁποῖος ἂν εἴη τοῦ φιλοσόφου βίος. διπλαῖς τε χρῆται ταῖς ἐπιγραφαῖς καθʼ ἑκάστου τῶν βιβλίων, τῇ μὲν ἀπὸ τοῦ ὀνόματος, τῇ δὲ ἀπὸ τοῦ πράγματος.

​There are, then, he says, in all fifty-six genuine dialogues of his, the Republic being divided into ten books—which Favorinus in the second book of his Miscellaneous History says is found almost in its entirety in Protagoras' Antilogies—and the Laws into twelve. There are nine tetralogies, with the Republic occupying the place of a single book, and the Laws likewise of one. He places first, then, the tetralogy that has a common subject, for he wishes to show what sort of thing the philosopher's life would be. He also uses double titles for each of the books, one derived from the name and the other from the subject matter.

ταύτης τῆς τετραλογίας, ἥτις ἐστὶ πρώτη, ἡγεῖται Εὐθύφρων περὶ ὁσίου· διάλογος δʼ ἐστὶ πειραστικός· δεύτερος Ἀπολογία Σωκράτους, ἠθικός· τρίτος Κρίτων περὶ πρακτέου, ἠθικός· τέταρτος Φαίδων περὶ ψυχῆς, ἠθικός. δευτέρα τετραλογία, ἧς ἡγεῖται Κρατύλος περὶ ὀρθότητος ὀνομάτων, λογικός· Θεαίτητος περὶ ἐπιστήμης, πειραστικός· Σοφιστὴς περὶ τοῦ ὄντος, λογικός· Πολιτικὸς περὶ βασιλείας, λογικός. τῆς τρίτης ἡγεῖται Παρμενίδης περὶ ἰδεῶν, λογικός· Φίληβος περὶ ἡδονῆς, ἠθικός· Συμπόσιον περὶ ἀγαθοῦ, ἠθικός· Φαῖδρος περὶ ἔρωτος, ἠθικός.

​Leading this tetralogy, which is the first, is Euthyphro, or On Piety, and the dialogue is peirastic; second, the Apology of Socrates, ethical; third, Crito, or On What is to be Done, ethical; fourth, Phaedo, or On the Soul, ethical. The second tetralogy is headed by Cratylus, or On Correctness of Names, logical; Theaetetus, or On Knowledge, peirastic; Sophist, or On Being, logical; Statesman, or On Kingship, logical. The third is headed by Parmenides, or On Ideas, logical; Philebus, or On Pleasure, ethical; Symposium, or On the Good, ethical; Phaedrus, or On Love, ethical.

Τῆς τετάρτης ἡγεῖται Ἀλκιβιάδης περὶ ἀνθρώπου φύσεως, μαιευτικός· Ἀλκιβιάδης δεύτερος περὶ εὐχῆς, μαιευτικός· Ἵππαρχος φιλοκερδής, ἠθικός· Ἀντερασταὶ περὶ φιλοσοφίας, ἠθικός. τῆς πέμπτης ἡγεῖται Θεάγης περὶ φιλοσοφίας, μαιευτικός· Χαρμίδης περὶ σωφροσύνης, πειραστικός· Λάχης περὶ ἀνδρείας, μαιευτικός· Λύσις περὶ φιλίας, μαιευτικός. τῆς ἕκτης ἡγεῖται Εὐθύδημος ἐριστικός, ἀνατρεπτικός· Πρωταγόρας σοφισταί, ἐνδεικτικός· Γοργίας περὶ ῥητορικῆς, ἀνατρεπτικός· Μένων περὶ ἀρετῆς, πειραστικός.

​The fourth is headed by Alcibiades, or On the Nature of Man, maieutic; Second Alcibiades, or On Prayer, maieutic; Hipparchus, or The Lover of Gain, ethical; Rival Lovers, or On Philosophy, ethical. The fifth is headed by Theages, or On Philosophy, maieutic; Charmides, or On Temperance, peirastic; Laches, or On Courage, maieutic; Lysis, or On Friendship, maieutic. The sixth is headed by Euthydemus, or The Disputant, anatreptic; Protagoras, or Sophists, endeictic; Gorgias, or On Rhetoric, anatreptic; Meno, or On Virtue, peirastic.

τῆς ἑβδόμης ἡγοῦνται Ἱππίαι δύοα περὶ τοῦ καλοῦ, β περὶ τοῦ ψεύδους -ἀνατρεπτικοί· Ἴων περὶ Ἰλιάδος, πειραστικός· Μενέξενος ἐπιτάφιος, ἠθικός. τῆς ὀγδόης ἡγεῖται Κλειτοφῶν προτρεπτικός, ἠθικός· Πολιτεία περὶ δικαίου, πολιτικός· Τίμαιος περὶ φύσεως, φυσικός· Κριτίας Ἀτλαντικός, ἠθικός. τῆς ἐνάτης ἡγεῖται Μίνως περὶ νόμου, πολιτικός· Νόμοι περὶ νομοθεσίας, πολιτικός· Ἐπινομὶς νυκτερινὸς σύλλογος φιλόσοφος, πολιτικός· Ἐπιστολαὶ τρεισκαίδεκα, ἠθικαί

​The seventh is headed by the two Hippias—the First, or On the Beautiful, the Second, or On Falsehood—anatreptic; Ion, or On the Iliad, peirastic; Menexenus, or The Funeral Oration, ethical. The eighth is headed by Clitophon, or Exhortation, ethical; Republic, or On Justice, political; Timaeus, or On Nature, physical; Critias, or Atlanticus, ethical. The ninth is headed by Minos, or On Law, political; Laws, or On Legislation, political; Epinomis, or The Nocturnal Council, or The Philosopher, political; thirteen Epistles, ethical—

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 3.1.55προαποδειχθέντος τοῦ καθόλου διὰ τῶν ἐπὶ μέρους

    A genitive absolute construction expressing the prerequisite for dialectical induction (introduced in §54). In contrast to rhetorical induction (which moves directly from particular to particular), here the prefix προ- indicates that the universal principle must be established in advance through particulars before it is applied to demonstrate the specific subject under inquiry.

  2. 3.1.56οἷον ἐκεῖνοι τέτρασι δράμασιν ἠγωνίζοντο

    The conjunctional οἷον functions adverbially to explain the preceding phrase κατὰ τὴν τραγικὴν τετραλογίαν ('according to tragic tetralogy'). The demonstrative subject ἐκεῖνοι ('those men') refers back contextually to the tragic poets. The dative τέτρασι δράμασιν expresses means/instrument, while the festival names in the dative plural (Διονυσίοις, etc.) are datives of time.

  3. 3.1.57ἑνὸς βιβλίου χώραν ἐπεχούσης τῆς Πολιτείας καὶ ἑνὸς τῶν Νόμων

    A genitive absolute construction conjoining two feminine singular subjects (τῆς Πολιτείας and τῶν Νόμων, the latter ellipsis of τῆς πραγματείας / τῆς συγγραφῆς or treated collectively). The idiom χώραν ἐπέχειν means 'to hold the place/rank of', governing the objective genitive ἑνὸς βιβλίου. This syntactically accounts for the arithmetic whereby the 56 books fit into 9 tetralogies (36 slots), treating each massive work as a single unit.

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:3.1.55-3.1.60