- Source
- Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.8-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:3.1.43-3.1.49
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-09-24
Plato's will concludes with the listing of executors, followed by epitaphs and epigrams on his tomb, and a catalogue of his disciples, including two women. The author then addresses his female dedicatee to introduce the origin, definition, and formal taxonomy of Plato's dialogues.
σκεύη 〈.....〉 τὰ γεγραμμένα, ὧν ἔχει ἀντίγραφα Δημήτριος. ὀφείλω δʼ οὐδενὶ οὐθέν. ἐπίτροποι Λεωσθένης Σπεύσιππος Δημήτριος Ἡγίας Εὐρυμέδων Καλλίμαχος Θράσιππος. Καὶ διέθετο μὲν οὕτως. ἐπεγράφη δʼ αὐτοῦ τῷ τάφῳ ἐπιγράμματα τάδε· πρῶτον· "σωφροσύνῃ προφέρων θνητῶν ἤθει τε δικαίῳ ἐνθάδε δὴ κεῖται θεῖος Ἀριστοκλέης· εἰ δέ τις ἐκ πάντων σοφίης μέγαν ἔσχεν ἔπαινον τοῦτον ἔχει πλεῖστον1 καὶ φθόνος οὐχ ἕπεται."
Household goods <.....> as written down, of which Demetrius has the duplicates. I owe nothing to anyone. Executors: Leosthenes, Speusippus, Demetrius, Hegias, Eurymedon, Callimachus, Thrasippus." In this way, then, he made his will. And the following epigrams were inscribed on his tomb. First: "Surpassing mortals in temperance and righteous character, here indeed lies divine Aristocles; and if anyone ever gained great praise for wisdom among all men, he holds it in the highest measure, nor does envy attend him."
ἕτερον δέ· "γαῖα μὲν ἐν κόλπῳ κρύπτει τόδε σῶμα Πλάτωνος, ψυχὴ δʼ ἀθάνατον τάξιν ἔχει μακάρων υἱοῦ Ἀρίστωνος, τόν τις καὶ τηλόθι ναίων τιμᾷ ἀνὴρ ἀγαθὸς θεῖον ἰδόντα βίον." καὶ ἄλλο νεώτερον· "αἰετέ, τίπτε βέβηκας ὑπὲρ τάφον; ἦ τινος, εἰπέ, ἀστερόεντα θεῶν οἶκον ἀποσκοπέεις; —ψυχῆς εἰμι Πλάτωνος ἀποπταμένης ἐς Ὄλυμπον εἰκών, σῶμα δὲ 〈γῆ〉 γηγενὲς Ἀτθὶς ἔχει."
Another: "Earth indeed hides this body of Plato in her bosom, but his soul holds an immortal station among the blessed, the soul of the son of Ariston, whom even a noble man dwelling far off honors, one who has beheld a divine life." And another, of more recent date: "Eagle, why ever hast thou perched upon the tomb? Say, dost thou look off toward the starry home of the gods on behalf of someone? —I am an image of Plato's soul, which has flown away to Olympus, while Attic earth holds his earthborn body."
ἔστι καὶ ἡμέτερον οὕτως ἔχον· "καὶ πῶς εἰ μὴ Φοῖβος ἀνʼ Ἑλλάδα φῦσε Πλάτωνα, ψυχὰς ἀνθρώπων γράμμασιν ἠκέσατο; καὶ γὰρ ὁ τοῦδε γεγὼς Ἀσκληπιός ἐστιν ἰητὴρ σώματος, ὡς ψυχῆς ἀθανάτοιο Πλάτων." καὶ ἄλλο, ὡς ἐτελεύτα· "Φοῖβος ἔφυσε βροτοῖς Ἀσκληπιὸν ἠδὲ Πλάτωνα, τὸν μὲν ἵνα ψυχήν, τὸν δʼ ἵνα σῶμα σάοι. δαισάμενος δὲ γάμον πόλιν ἤλυθεν, ἣν ποθʼ ἑαυτῷ ἔκτισε καὶ δαπέδῳ Ζηνὸς ἐνιδρύσατο." καὶ τὰ μὲν ἐπιγράμματα ταῦτα.
There is also one of our own, which runs as follows: "And how, if Phoebus had not brought forth Plato for Greece, could he have healed the souls of men with his writings? For Asclepius, whom he begot, is the healer of the body, as Plato is of the immortal soul." And another on how he died: "Phoebus brought forth Asclepius and Plato for mortals, the one that he might heal the soul, the other the body. And having feasted at a wedding, he went to the city which he once founded for himself and established upon the floor of Zeus." These, then, are the epigrams.
Μαθηταὶ δʼ αὐτοῦ Σπεύσιππος Ἀθηναῖος, Ξενοκράτης Καλχηδόνιος, Ἀριστοτέλης Σταγειρίτης, Φίλιππος Ὀπούντιος, Ἑστιαῖος Περίνθιος, Δίων Συρακόσιος, Ἄμυκλος Ἡρακλεώτης, Ἔραστος καὶ Κορίσκος Σκήψιοι, Τιμόλαος Κυζικηνός, Εὐαίων Λαμψακηνός, Πύθων καὶ Ἡρακλείδης Αἴνιοι, Ἱπποθάλης καὶ Κάλλιππος Ἀθηναῖοι, Δημήτριος Ἀμφιπολίτης, Ἡρακλείδης Ποντικὸς καὶ ἄλλοι πλείους, σὺν οἷς καὶ γυναῖκες δύο Λασθένεια Μαντινικὴ καὶ Ἀξιοθέα Φλειασία ἣ καὶ ἀνδρεῖα ἠμπίσχετο, ὥς φησι Δικαίαρχος. ἔνιοι δὲ καὶ Θεόφραστον ἀκοῦσαί φασιν αὐτοῦ· καὶ Ὑπερίδην τὸν ῥήτορα Χαμαιλέων φησὶ καὶ Λυκοῦργον.
His disciples were Speusippus of Athens, Xenocrates of Chalcedon, Aristotle of Stagira, Philippus of Opus, Hestiaeus of Perinthus, Dion of Syracuse, Amyclus of Heraclea, Erastus and Coriscus of Scepsis, Timolaus of Cyzicus, Euaeon of Lampsacus, Python and Heraclides of Aenus, Hippothales and Callippus of Athens, Demetrius of Amphipolis, Heraclides Ponticus, and many others, among whom were also two women: Lastheneia of Mantinea and Axiothea of Phlius, who also wore men's clothing, as Dicaearchus says. Some also say that Theophrastus attended his lectures; and Chamaeleon says that Hyperides the orator and Lycurgus did so as well;
ὁμοίως Πολέμων ἱστορεῖ. καὶ Δημοσθένην Σαβῖνος λέγει Μνησίστρατον Θάσιον παρατιθέμενος ἐν δʼ Μελετητικῆς ὕλης· καὶ εἰκός ἐστι. Φιλοπλάτωνι δέ σοι δικαίως ὑπαρχούσῃ καὶ παρʼ ὁντινοῦν τὰ τοῦ φιλοσόφου δόγματα φιλοτίμως ζητούσῃ2 ἀναγκαῖον ἡγησάμην ὑπογράψαι καὶ τὴν φύσιν τῶν λόγων καὶ τὴν τάξιν τῶν διαλόγων καὶ τὴν ἔφοδον τῆς ἐπαγωγῆς, ὡς οἷόν τε στοιχειωδῶς καὶ ἐπὶ κεφαλαίων, πρὸς τὸ μὴ ἀμοιρεῖν αὐτοῦ τῶν δογμάτων τὴν περὶ τοῦ βίου συναγωγήν· γλαῦκα γὰρ εἰς Ἀθήνας, φασίν, εἰ δέῃ σοι τὰ κατʼ εἶδος διηγεῖσθαι3.
Polemon recounts similarly. And Sabinus, citing Mnesistratus of Thasos in the fourth book of his Materials for Rhetorical Exercises, says that Demosthenes also did; and this is likely. Now, since you are rightly a lover of Plato and zealously seek the philosopher's doctrines above anyone else, I thought it necessary to sketch both the nature of the discourses, the order of the dialogues, and the method of induction, as elementarily and summarily as possible, so that this collection concerning his life should not lack his doctrines; for it would be 'owls to Athens', as they say, if one had to narrate the details to you.
Διαλόγους τοίνυν φασὶ πρῶτον γράψαι Ζήνωνα τὸν Ἐλεάτην· Ἀριστοτέλης δὲ ἐν πρώτῳ Περὶ ποιητῶν Ἀλεξαμενὸν Στυρέα ἢ Τήιον, ὡς καὶ Φαβωρῖνος ἐν Ἀπομνημονεύμασι. δοκεῖ δέ μοι Πλάτων ἀκριβώσας τὸ εἶδος καὶ τὰ πρωτεῖα δικαίως ἂν ὥσπερ τοῦ κάλλους οὕτω καὶ τῆς εὑρέσεως ἀποφέρεσθαι4. ἔστι δὲ διάλογος 〈λόγοσ〉 ἐξ ἐρωτήσεως καὶ ἀποκρίσεως συγκείμενος περί τινος τῶν φιλοσοφουμένων καὶ πολιτικῶν μετὰ τῆς πρεπούσης ἠθοποιίας τῶν παραλαμβανομένων προσώπων καὶ τῆς κατὰ τὴν λέξιν κατασκευῆς. διαλεκτικὴ δʼ ἐστὶ τέχνη λόγων, διʼ ἧς ἀνασκευάζομέν τι ἢ κατασκευάζομεν ἐξ ἐρωτήσεως καὶ ἀποκρίσεως τῶν προσδιαλεγομένων.
Now, they say that Zeno of Elea first wrote dialogues; but Aristotle, in the first book of On Poets, says Alexamenus of Styra or of Teos did so, as Favorinus also says in his Memorabilia. But it seems to me that Plato, having perfected the genre, would justly carry off the first prize both for its beauty and for its invention. A dialogue is a discourse composed of question and answer concerning some philosophical or political subject, accompanied by the appropriate character portrayal of the persons introduced and rhetorical arrangement of the diction. Dialectic is the art of discourse by which we refute or establish something through the question and answer of the interlocutors.
Τοῦ δὴ 〈δια〉λόγου τοῦ Πλατωνικοῦ δύʼ εἰσὶν ἀνωτάτω χαρακτῆρες, ὅ τε ὑφηγητικὸς καὶ ὁ ζητητικός. διαιρεῖται δὲ ὁ ὑφηγητικὸς εἰς ἄλλους δύο χαρακτῆρας, θεωρηματικόν τε καὶ πρακτικόν. καὶ τῶν ὁ μὲν θεωρηματικὸς εἰς τὸν φυσικὸν καὶ λογικόν, ὁ δὲ πρακτικὸς εἰς τὸν ἠθικὸν καὶ πολιτικόν. τοῦ δὲ ζητητικοῦ καὶ αὐτοῦ δύο εἰσὶν οἱ πρῶτοι χαρακτῆρες, ὅ τε γυμναστικὸς καὶ ἀγωνιστικός. καὶ τοῦ μὲν γυμναστικοῦ μαιευτικός τε καὶ πειραστικός, τοῦ δὲ ἀγωνιστικοῦ ἐνδεικτικὸς καὶ ἀνατρεπτικός.
Of the Platonic dialogue, there are two highest character types: the expository and the inquisitive. The expository is divided into two other character types: the theoretical and the practical. And of these, the theoretical is divided into the physical and the logical, and the practical into the ethical and the political. Of the inquisitive, there are likewise two primary character types: the gymnastic and the agonistic. And of the gymnastic, the maieutic and the peirastic; of the agonistic, the endeictic and the anatreptic.
- 3.1.43εἰ δέ τις ἐκ πάντων σοφίης μέγαν ἔσχεν ἔπαινον / τοῦτον ἔχει πλεῖστον
Correlative conditional structure where the antecedent in the protasis (τις … ἔπαινον) is resumed by the demonstrative pronoun in the apodosis (τοῦτον). The pronoun τοῦτον resumes μέγαν ἔπαινον as the object of ἔχει πλεῖστον ('he possesses this [praise] in the greatest degree').
- 3.1.47Φιλοπλάτωνι δέ σοι δικαίως ὑπαρχούσῃ καὶ παρʼ ὁντινοῦν τὰ τοῦ φιλοσόφου δόγματα φιλοτίμως ζητούσῃ
The feminine dative singular participles ὑπαρχούσῃ and ζητούσῃ agree with the personal pronoun σοι, explicitly indicating that the dedicatee addressed here is a woman. The prepositional phrase παρʼ ὁντινοῦν functions adverbially with comparative force ('beyond anyone else') modifying ζητούσῃ.
- 3.1.47γλαῦκα γὰρ εἰς Ἀθήνας, φασίν, εἰ δέῃ σοι τὰ κατʼ εἶδος διηγεῖσθαι
An elliptical expression of the well-known Greek proverb 'owls to Athens' (carrying coals to Newcastle). The proverbial phrase γλαῦκα εἰς Ἀθήνας ellipses a verbal element such as κομίζειν and the potential copula ἂν εἴη: 'for it would be [carrying] owls to Athens, as they say, if one were to have to relate the particulars to you'.
- 3.1.48δοκεῖ δέ μοι Πλάτων ἀκριβώσας τὸ εἶδος καὶ τὰ πρωτεῖα δικαίως ἂν ὥσπερ τοῦ κάλλους οὕτω καὶ τῆς εὑρέσεως ἀποφέρεσθαι
Personal construction with δοκεῖ: Πλάτων (nominative) functions as the personal subject of δοκεῖ μοι, with the participle ἀκριβώσας agreeing with it. The combination of ἄν with the present infinitive ἀποφέρεσθαι represents a potential construction ('Plato seems to me likely to carry off... / would justly carry off...').
