Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§2.7.60-2.7.64

Life of Aeschines, Authenticity of Dialogues, and Homonyms

Diogenes Laertius details the life of Socrates' disciple Aeschines, controversies over the authenticity of his dialogues, his impoverished journey to Sicily, and lists eight men of the same name.

← PrevNext →

Αἰσχίνης Χαρίνου τοῦ ἀλλαντοποιοῦ, οἱ δὲ Λυσανίου, Ἀθηναῖος, ἐκ νέου φιλόπονος· διὸ καὶ Σωκράτους οὐκ ἀπέστη. ὅθεν ἔλεγε, μόνος ἡμᾶς οἶδε τιμᾶν τοῦ ἀλλαντοποιοῦ. τοῦτον ἔφη Ἰδομενεὺς ἐν τῷ δεσμωτηρίῳ συμβουλεῦσαι περὶ τῆς φυγῆς Σωκράτει, καὶ οὐ Κρίτωνα· Πλάτωνα δέ, ὅτι ἦν Ἀριστίππῳ μᾶλλον φίλος1, Κρίτωνι περιθεῖναι τοὺς λόγους. διεβάλλετο δʼ Αἰσχίνης καὶ μάλισθʼ ὑπὸ Μενεδήμου τοῦ Ἐρετριέως ὡς τοὺς πλείστους διαλόγους ὄντας Σωκράτους ὑποβάλλοιτο, λαμβάνων παρὰ Ξανθίππης· ὧν οἱ μὲν καλούμενοι ἀκέφαλοι σφόδρʼ εἰσὶν ἐκλελυμένοι καὶ οὐκ ἐπιφαίνοντες τὴν Σωκρατικὴν εὐτονίαν· οὓς καὶ Πεισίστρατος Ἐφέσιος ἔλεγε μὴ εἶναι Αἰσχίνου.

​Aeschines was the son of Charinus the sausage-maker (or, according to others, of Lysanias), an Athenian, hardworking from his youth; wherefore he never left the side of Socrates. Hence Socrates used to say: "Only the sausage-maker's son knows how to honour us." Idomeneus stated that it was this man who advised Socrates in prison concerning flight, and not Crito; but that Plato, because Aeschines was more of a friend to Aristippus, assigned the speeches to Crito. Aeschines was also slandered, especially by Menedemus of Eretria, on the grounds that he was fraudulently putting forward as his own most of the dialogues which were really by Socrates, having received them from Xanthippe. Of these, those called "headless" are exceedingly loose and do not display the Socratic vigour; which dialogues Pisistratus of Ephesus also said were not by Aeschines.

καὶ τῶν ἑπτὰ δὲ τοὺς πλείστους Περσαῖός φησι Πασιφῶντος εἶναι τοῦ Ἐρετρικοῦ, εἰς τοὺς Αἰσχίνου δὲ κατατάξαι. ἀλλὰ καὶ τῶν Ἀντισθένους τόν τε μικρὸν Κῦρον καὶ τὸν Ἡρακλέα τὸν ἐλάσσω καὶ Ἀλκιβιάδην καὶ τοὺς τῶν ἄλλων δὲ ἐσκευώρηται. οἱ δʼ οὖν τῶν Αἰσχίνου τὸ Σωκρατικὸν ἦθος ἀπομεμαγμένοι εἰσὶν ἑπτά· πρῶτος Μιλτιάδης, διὸ καὶ ἀσθενέστερόν πως ἔχει· Καλλίας, Ἀξίοχος, Ἀσπασία, Ἀλκιβιάδης, Τηλαύγης, Ῥίνων. Φασὶ δʼ αὐτὸν διʼ ἀπορίαν ἐλθεῖν εἰς Σικελίαν πρὸς Διονύσιον, καὶ ὑπὸ μὲν Πλάτωνος παροφθῆναι, ὑπὸ δʼ Ἀριστίππου συστῆναι· δόντα τέ τινας τῶν διαλόγων δῶρα λαβεῖν.

​Moreover, Persaeus says that most of the seven dialogues are really by Pasiphon of Eretria, who inserted them among those of Aeschines. Furthermore, he concocted works from those of Antisthenes as well, namely the Lesser Cyrus, the Lesser Heracles, and the Alcibiades, and also from the works of others. At any rate, those among the dialogues of Aeschines which have caught the true stamp of the Socratic character are seven: first, the Miltiades, which is somewhat weak in tone; the Callias, Axiochus, Aspasia, Alcibiades, Telauges, and Rhinon. They say that through lack of means he went to Sicily to Dionysius, and while he was slighted by Plato, he was introduced by Aristippus; and having presented some of his dialogues, he received gifts.

ἔπειτʼ ἀφικόμενον Ἀθήναζε μὴ τολμᾶν σοφιστεύειν, εὐδοκιμούντων τότε τῶν περὶ Πλάτωνα καὶ Ἀρίστιππον. ἐμμίσθους δʼ ἀκροάσεις ποιεῖσθαι· εἶτα συγγράφειν λόγους δικανικοὺς τοῖς ἀδικουμένοις· διὸ καὶ τὸν Τίμωνα εἰπεῖν ἐπʼ αὐτοῦ ἤτʼ Αἰσχίνου οὐκ ἀπιθὴςἴσγράψαι. φασὶ δʼ αὐτῷ λέγειν Σωκράτην, ἐπειδήπερ ἐπιέζετο ὑπὸ πενίας, παρʼ ἑαυτοῦ δανείζεσθαι τῶν σιτίων ὑφαιροῦντα2. τούτου τοὺς διαλόγους καὶ Ἀρίστιππος ὑπώπτευεν. ἐν γοῦν Μεγάροις ἀναγινώσκοντος αὐτοῦ φασι σκῶψαι εἰπόντα, πόθεν σοι, λῃστά, ταῦτα;

​Afterwards, having returned to Athens, he did not dare to profess the sophist's craft, since Plato and Aristippus and their circles were then in high repute. Instead, he gave lectures for pay; and then he composed forensic speeches for those who had suffered wrong; wherefore Timon also said in reference to him: "or the not unpersuasive force of Aeschines to write...." And they say that Socrates told him, since he was pressed by poverty, to borrow from himself by reducing his rations. Aristippus too suspected his dialogues. At any rate, when Aeschines was reading them aloud in Megara, they say Aristippus mocked him, saying: "Whence, pirate, did you get these?"

Φησὶ δὲ Πολύκριτος Μενδαῖος ἐν τῷ πρώτῳ τῶν περὶ Διονύσιον ἄχρι τῆς ἐκπτώσεως συμβιῶναι αὐτὸν τῷ τυράννῳ καὶ ἕως τῆς Δίωνος εἰς Συρακούσας καθόδου, λέγων εἶναι σὺν αὐτῷ καὶ Καρκίνον τὸν τραγῳδιοποιόν. φέρεται δὲ καὶ ἐπιστολὴ πρὸς Διονύσιον Αἰσχίνου. ἦν δὲ καὶ ἐν τοῖς ῥητορικοῖς ἱκανῶς γεγυμνασμένος· ὡς δῆλον ἔκ τε τῆς ἀπολογίας τοῦ πατρὸς Φαίακος τοῦ στρατηγοῦ καὶ Δίωνος. μάλιστα δὲ μιμεῖται Γοργίαν τὸν Λεοντῖνον. καὶ Λυσίας δὲ κατʼ αὐτοῦ γέγραφε λόγον, [περὶ] συκοφαντίας ἐπιγράψας· ἐξ ὧν δῆλον ὅτι καὶ ῥητορικός τις ἦν. γνώριμος δʼ αὐτοῦ φέρεται εἷς, Ἀριστοτέλης Μῦθος ἐπικληθείς.

​Polycritus of Mende says in the first book of his work On Dionysius that he lived with the tyrant until his expulsion and down to Dion's return to Syracuse, stating that Carcinus the tragic poet was also with him. There is also extant an epistle of Aeschines to Dionysius. He was also well practiced in rhetorical skills, as is clear both from the defense for the father of Phaiax the general, and that for Dion. He imitates Gorgias of Leontini above all. Moreover, Lysias wrote a speech against him, entitled On Slander; from which it is evident that he was also an orator of sorts. Only one acquaintance of his is recorded, Aristotle who was surnamed Myth.

Πάντων μέντοι τῶν Σωκρατικῶν διαλόγων Παναίτιος ἀληθεῖς εἶναι δοκεῖ3 τοὺς Πλάτωνος, Ξενοφῶντος, Ἀντισθένους, Αἰσχίνου· διστάζει δὲ περὶ τῶν Φαίδωνος καὶ Εὐκλείδου, τοὺς δὲ ἄλλους ἀναιρεῖ πάντας. Γεγόνασι δʼ Αἰσχίναι ὀκτώ· πρῶτος αὐτὸς οὗτος· δεύτερος δʼ τὰς τέχνας γεγραφὼς τὰς ῥητορικάς· τρίτος ῥήτωρ κατὰ Δημοσθένην· τέταρτος Ἀρκάς, μαθητὴς Ἰσοκράτους· πέμπτος Μυτιληναῖος, ὃν καὶ ῥητορομάστιγα ἐκάλουν· ἕκτος Νεαπολίτης, φιλόσοφος Ἀκαδημαϊκός, Μελανθίου τοῦ Ῥοδίου μαθητὴς καὶ παιδικά· ἕβδομος Μιλήσιος, πολιτικὸς συγγραφεύς· ὄγδοος ἀνδριαντοποιός.

​Of all the Socratic dialogues, however, Panaetius appears to consider genuine those of Plato, Xenophon, Antisthenes, and Aeschines; he doubts concerning those of Phaedo and Euclides, and rejects all the others. There have been eight persons named Aeschines: the first is this man himself; the second the author of rhetorical treatises; the third the orator who was Demosthenes' opponent; the fourth an Arcadian, pupil of Isocrates; the fifth a Mytilenaean, whom they also called "the whip of orators"; the sixth a Neapolitan, an Academic philosopher, pupil and favourite of Melanthius of Rhodes; the seventh a Milesian, a writer on politics; the eighth a maker of statues.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 2.7.60ὅτι ἦν Ἀριστίππῳ μᾶλλον φίλος

    In this causal clause, the subject of ἦν is most naturally taken as Aeschines: Plato assigned the prison conversation to Crito because Aeschines was friendlier with Aristippus (with whom Plato was on bad terms). Although grammatically Plato could be the subject ('because Plato was more of a friend to Aristippus'), this conflicts with the well-known friction between Plato and Aristippus described in the tradition.

  2. 2.7.62παρʼ ἑαυτοῦ δανείζεσθαι τῶν σιτίων ὑφαιροῦντα

    An imperatival infinitive construction in indirect speech dependent on λέγειν. The infinitive δανείζεσθαι conveys the advice/injunction given by Socrates to Aeschines. The masculine accusative participle ὑφαιροῦντα agrees with the unexpressed accusative subject of the infinitive (αὐτόν) and functions adverbially (means: 'by subtracting from his food supplies'). The genitive τῶν σιτίων functions as a partitive genitive.

  3. 2.7.64Παναίτιος ἀληθεῖς εἶναι δοκεῖ

    A personal construction of the verb δοκέω (subject raising). Instead of an impersonal phrasing ('it seems that Panaetius considers...'), the proper noun Παναίτιος serves as the personal subject: 'Panaetius appears to consider...'. The predicate adjective ἀληθεῖς agrees in the accusative with its object τοὺς (sc. διαλόγους).

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:2.7.60-2.7.64