Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§2.10.106-2.10.112

Euclides and the Megarian Philosophers

This section recounts the life and doctrines of Euclides, founder of the Megarian school (the unity of the Good, critique of proofs), and surveys his successors including Eubulides, Alexinus, Euphantus, and Diodorus Cronus, noting their treatises, paradoxes, and disputes.

← PrevNext →

Εὐκλείδης ἀπὸ Μεγάρων τῶν πρὸς Ἰσθμῷ, Γελῶος κατʼ ἐνίους, ὥς φησιν Ἀλέξανδρος ἐν Διαδοχαῖς. οὗτος καὶ τὰ Παρμενίδεια μετεχειρίζετο, καὶ οἱ ἀπʼ αὐτοῦ Μεγαρικοὶ προσηγορεύοντο, εἶτʼ ἐριστικοί, ὕστερον δὲ διαλεκτικοί, οὓς οὕτως ὠνόμασε πρῶτος Διονύσιος Χαλκηδόνιος, διὰ τὸ πρὸς ἐρώτησιν καὶ ἀπόκρισιν τοὺς λόγους διατίθεσθαι.1 πρὸς τοῦτόν φησιν Ἑρμόδωρος ἀφικέσθαι Πλάτωνα καὶ τοὺς λοιποὺς φιλοσόφους μετὰ τὴν τοῦ Σωκράτους τελευτήν, δείσαντας τὴν ὠμότητα τῶν τυράννων. οὗτος ἓν τὸ ἀγαθὸν ἀπεφαίνετο πολλοῖς ὀνόμασι καλούμενον· ὁτὲ μὲν γὰρ φρόνησιν, ὁτὲ δὲ θεόν, καὶ ἄλλοτε νοῦν καὶ τὰ λοιπά. τὰ δʼ ἀντικείμενα τῷ ἀγαθῷ ἀνῄρει, μὴ εἶναι φάσκων.

​Euclides was from Megara on the Isthmus, or according to some, from Gela, as Alexander says in the Successions. He also adopted the Parmenidean teachings, and those who sprang from him were called Megarians, then Eristics, and later Dialecticians, whom Dionysius of Chalcedon first so named because they put their arguments into the form of question and answer. Hermodorus says that Plato and the rest of the philosophers went to him after the death of Socrates, fearing the cruelty of the tyrants. He used to declare that the Good is one, called by many names: for at times it is called prudence, at other times god, and at other times mind and the rest. But he abolished the things opposed to the Good, declaring that they do not exist.

Ταῖς τε ἀποδείξεσιν ἐνίστατο οὐ κατὰ λήμματα, ἀλλὰ κατʼ ἐπιφοράν. καὶ τὸν διὰ παραβολῆς λόγον ἀνῄρει, λέγων ἤτοι ἐξ ὁμοίων αὐτὸν ἐξ ἀνομοίων συνίστασθαι· καὶ εἰ μὲν ἐξ ὁμοίων, περὶ αὐτὰ δεῖν μᾶλλον οἷς ὅμοιά ἐστιν ἀναστρέφεσθαι2, εἰ δʼ ἐξ ἀνομοίων, παρέλκειν τὴν παράθεσιν. διὰ ταῦτα δὲ καὶ περὶ αὐτοῦ ταῦτά φησι Τίμων, προσπαρατρώγων καὶ τοὺς λοιποὺς Σωκρατικούς· "ἀλλʼ οὔ μοι τούτων φλεδόνων μέλει, οὐδὲ γὰρ ἄλλου οὐδενός, οὐ Φαίδωνος, ὅτις γένετʼ, οὐδʼ ἐριδάντεω Εὐκλείδεω, Μεγαρεῦσιν ὃς ἔμβαλε λύσσαν ἐρισμοῦ."

​He attacked proofs not by their premises, but by their conclusion. And he abolished argument by analogy, saying that it consists either of like things or of unlike things; and if of like things, one ought to occupy oneself with the things themselves rather than with those to which they are like, but if of unlike things, the comparison is superfluous. For these reasons Timon also says of him as follows, while also snapping at the rest of the Socratics: "Nay, but for these babblers I care not, nor indeed for any other, neither for Phaedo, whoever he was, nor for the contentious Euclides, who instilled in the Megarians the frenzy of dispute."

Διαλόγους δὲ συνέγραψεν ἕξ, Λαμπρίαν, Αἰσχίνην, Φοίνικα, Κρίτωνα, Ἀλκιβιάδην, Ἐρωτικόν. τῆς δʼ Εὐκλείδου διαδοχῆς ἐστι καὶ Εὐβουλίδης Μιλήσιος, ὃς καὶ πολλοὺς ἐν διαλεκτικῇ λόγους ἠρώτησε, τόν τε ψευδόμενον καὶ τὸν διαλανθάνοντα καὶ Ἠλέκτραν καὶ ἐγκεκαλυμμένον καὶ σωρίτην καὶ κερατίνην καὶ φαλακρόν. περὶ τούτου φησί τις τῶν κωμικῶν· "οὑριστικὸς δʼ Εὐβουλίδης κερατίνας ἐρωτῶν καὶ ψευδαλαζόσιν λόγοις τοὺς ῥήτορας κυλίων ἀπῆλθʼ ἔχων Δημοσθένους τὴν ῥωποπερπερήθραν." ἐῴκει γὰρ αὐτοῦ καὶ Δημοσθένης ἀκηκοέναι καὶ ῥωβικώτερος ὢν παύσασθαι.

​He composed six dialogues: Lamprias, Aeschines, Phoenix, Crito, Alcibiades, and The Amorous. Belonging to the succession of Euclides is also Eubulides of Miletus, who also proposed many arguments in dialectic: The Liar, The Disguised, Electra, The Veiled, The Sorites, The Horned, and The Bald. Concerning him, one of the comic poets says: "The eristic Eubulides, asking horned questions and confounding the orators with false and bragging arguments, departed with Demosthenes' pompous blather." For Demosthenes seems also to have been his pupil and, having had a speech defect, to have ceased from it.

δʼ Εὐβουλίδης καὶ πρὸς Ἀριστοτέλην διεφέρετο, καὶ πολλὰ αὐτὸν διαβέβληκε. Μεταξὺ δὲ ἄλλων ὄντων τῆς Εὐβουλίδου διαδοχῆς Ἀλεξῖνος ἐγένετο Ἠλεῖος, ἀνὴρ φιλονεικότατος· διὸ καὶ Ἐλεγξῖνος ἐπεκλήθη. διεφέρετο δὲ μάλιστα πρὸς Ζήνωνα. φησὶ δʼ Ἕρμιππος περὶ αὐτοῦ ὡς ἄρα ἀπελθὼν ἐκ τῆς Ἤλιδος εἰς Ὀλυμπίαν αὐτόθι φιλοσοφοίη. τῶν δὲ μαθητῶν αὐτοῦ πυνθανομένων διὰ τί τῇδε κατοικεῖ, φάναι βούλεσθαι αἵρεσιν συστήσασθαι ἣν Ὀλυμπικὴν κληθήσεσθαι3. τοὺς δὲ καὶ τοῖς ἐφοδίοις θλιβομένους καὶ τὸ χωρίον νοσερὸν καταγνόντας ἀπελθεῖν, καὶ τοῦ λοιποῦ διατρίβειν ἔρημον τὸν Ἀλεξῖνον σὺν οἰκέτῃ μόνῳ· ἔπειτα μέντοι νηχόμενον ἐν τῷ Ἀλφειῷ νυχθῆναι καλάμῳ καὶ οὕτω τελευτῆσαι.

​Eubulides was also at variance with Aristotle and slandered him greatly. Among others belonging to the succession of Eubulides was Alexinus of Elis, a most contentious man; wherefore he was also dubbed Elenxinus. He was especially at variance with Zeno. Hermippus says of him that, having left Elis for Olympia, he philosophized there. When his pupils asked why he resided there, he said that he wished to establish a school which should be called the Olympic. But they, being oppressed by lack of provisions and judging the place unhealthy, departed, and for the rest of the time Alexinus lived in solitude with a single servant; later, however, while swimming in the Alpheus, he was pierced by a reed and so perished.

Καὶ ἔστιν εἰς αὐτὸν ἡμῶν οὕτως ἔχον· "οὐκ ἆρα μῦθος ἦν ἐκεῖνος εἰκαῖος, ὡς ἀτυχής τις ἐὼν τὸν πόδα κολυμβῶν περιέπειρέ πως ἥλῳ. καὶ γὰρ σεμνὸς ἀνήρ, πρὶν Ἀλφεόν ποτʼ ἐκπερᾶν, Ἀλεξῖνος θνῆσκε νυγεὶς καλάμῳ." γέγραφε δʼ οὐ μόνον πρὸς Ζήνωνα, ἀλλὰ καὶ ἄλλα βιβλία καὶ πρὸς Ἔφορον τὸν ἱστοριογράφον. Εὐβουλίδου δὲ καὶ Εὔφαντος γέγονεγνώριμοσ Ὀλύνθιος, ἱστορίας γεγραφὼς τὰς κατὰ τοὺς χρόνους τοὺς ἑαυτοῦ. ἐποίησε δὲ καὶ τραγῳδίας πλείους, ἐν αἷς εὐδοκίμει κατὰ τοὺς ἀγῶνας. γέγονε δὲ καὶ Ἀντιγόνου τοῦ βασιλέως διδάσκαλος, πρὸς ὃν καὶ λόγον γέγραφε Περὶ βασιλείας σφόδρα εὐδοκιμοῦντα. τὸν βίον δὲ γήρᾳ κατέστρεψεν.

​And there is an epigram of ours upon him, running as follows: "So that was no idle tale after all, that a certain unlucky man, while swimming, somehow pierced his foot with a nail. For the solemn man, Alexinus, before he could cross the Alpheus, died, pierced by a reed." He wrote not only against Zeno, but also other books, and against Ephorus the historian. Of Eubulides, Euphantus of Olynthus also became a pupil, who wrote a history of his own times. He also composed several tragedies, in which he won renown in the contests. He was also a teacher of King Antigonus, to whom he wrote a treatise On Kingship that was held in very high esteem. He ended his life in old age.

Εἰσὶ δὲ καὶ ἄλλοι διακηκοότες Εὐβουλίδου, ἐν οἷς καὶ Ἀπολλώνιος Κρόνος, οὗ Διόδωρος Ἀμεινίου Ἰασεύς, καὶ αὐτὸς Κρόνος ἐπίκλην, περὶ οὗ φησι Καλλίμαχος ἐν ἐπιγράμμασιν· "αὐτὸς Μῶμος ἔγραφεν ἐν τοίχοις, Κρόνος ἐστὶ σοφός." ἦν δὲ καὶ οὗτος διαλεκτικός, πρῶτος δόξας εὑρηκέναι τὸν ἐγκεκαλυμμένον καὶ κερατίνην λόγον κατά τινας. οὗτος παρὰ Πτολεμαίῳ τῷ Σωτῆρι διατρίβων λόγους τινὰς διαλεκτικοὺς ἠρωτήθη πρὸς Στίλπωνος· καὶ μὴ δυνάμενος παραχρῆμα διαλύσασθαι, ὑπὸ τοῦ βασιλέως τά τε ἄλλα ἐπετιμήθη καὶ δὴ καὶ Κρόνος ἤκουσεν ἐν σκώμματος μέρει.

​There are also others who were pupils of Eubulides, among whom was Apollonius the Cronus, whose pupil was Diodorus, the son of Ameinias, of Iasus, who was himself surnamed Cronus, of whom Callimachus says in his Epigrams: "Momus himself wrote on the walls: 'Cronus is wise.'" He too was a dialectician, and was thought by some to have first discovered the Veiled and Horned arguments. While staying with Ptolemy Soter, he was asked certain dialectical arguments by Stilpo; and being unable to solve them on the spot, he was reproached by the king in other respects and indeed was called Cronus by way of a joke.

ἐξελθὼν δὴ τοῦ συμποσίου καὶ λόγον γράψας περὶ τοῦ προβλήματος ἀθυμίᾳ τὸν βίον κατέστρεψε. καὶ ἔστιν ἡμῶν εἰς αὐτόν· "Κρόνε Διόδωρε, τίς σε δαιμόνων κακῇ ἀθυμίῃ ξυνείρυσεν, ἵνʼ αὐτὸς αὑτὸν ἐμβάλῃς εἰς Τάρταρον Στίλπωνος οὐ λύσας ἔπη αἰνιγματώδη; τοιγὰρ εὑρέθης Κρόνος ἔξωθε τοῦ ῥῶ κάππα τε4." Τῶν δʼ ἀπʼ Εὐκλείδου ἐστὶ καὶ Ἰχθύας Μετάλλου, ἀνὴρ γενναῖος, πρὸς ὃν καὶ Διογένης κυνικὸς διάλογον πεποίηται· Κλεινόμαχός θʼ Θούριος, ὃς πρῶτος περὶ ἀξιωμάτων καὶ κατηγορημάτων καὶ τῶν τοιούτων συνέγραψε· καὶ Στίλπων Μεγαρεύς, διασημότατος φιλόσοφος, περὶ οὗ λεκτέον.

​Having left the symposium and written a treatise on the problem, he ended his life in despondency. And our epigram upon him is: "Diodorus Cronus, which of the deities brought you into wretched despondency, so that you cast yourself into Tartarus, unable to solve the riddling words of Stilpo? Truly you were found to be Cronus without the rho and the kappa." Of the pupils of Euclides there is also Ichthyas, son of Metallus, a worthy man, to whom Diogenes the Cynic also addressed a dialogue; and Clinomachus of Thurii, who first wrote on propositions, predicates, and the like; and Stilpo of Megara, a most illustrious philosopher, of whom we must speak.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 2.10.106οὓς οὕτως ὠνόμασε πρῶτος Διονύσιος ὁ Χαλκηδόνιος, διὰ τὸ πρὸς ἐρώτησιν καὶ ἀπόκρισιν τοὺς λόγους διατίθεσθαι.

    The relative pronoun οὕς refers back to διαλεκτικοί or the adherents of the school. In the causal prepositional phrase διὰ τὸ ... διατίθεσθαι, τοὺς λόγους is the direct object of the middle/passive infinitive διατίθεσθαι ('to construct/arrange their arguments'), while the subject of the infinitive is implied ('they', the Megarians).

  2. 2.10.107περὶ αὐτὰ δεῖν μᾶλλον ἢ οἷς ὅμοιά ἐστιν ἀναστρέφεσθαι

    The infinitive δεῖν represents an impersonal verb in indirect discourse, governing the complementary infinitive ἀναστρέφεσθαι ('to occupy oneself with'). In ἢ οἷς ὅμοιά ἐστιν, the relative pronoun οἷς incorporates its antecedent ('than [with the things] to which they are like'), functioning as the standard of comparison contrasting with περὶ αὐτά ('with the things themselves').

  3. 2.10.109ἣν Ὀλυμπικὴν κληθήσεσθαι

    The relative pronoun ἣν refers to αἵρεσιν and serves as the subject accusative of the future passive infinitive κληθήσεσθαι in indirect discourse, with Ὀλυμπικήν standing in predicate agreement.

  4. 2.10.112ἔξωθε τοῦ ῥῶ κάππα τε

    A wordplay indicating that if one removes the letters rho (ρ) and kappa (κ) from the name Κρόνος, the remaining letters form ὄνος ('ass/donkey', a traditional metaphor for a dunce). The preposition ἔξωθε ('apart from, without') governs the genitive of the neuter letter-names τοῦ ῥῶ κάππα τε.

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:2.10.106-2.10.112