← Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§10.1.63-10.1.68

Corporeality of the Soul and its Dispersion at Death

Epicurus explains that the soul is a fine-particled corporeal entity akin to breath and heat, which serves as the primary cause of sensation through mutual dependence with the body, and demonstrates that the soul disperses and perishes at death and cannot be incorporeal.

← PrevNext →

“Μετὰ δὲ ταῦτα δεῖ συνορᾶν ἀναφέροντα ἐπὶ τὰς αἰσθήσεις καὶ τὰ πάθη—οὕτω γὰρ ἡ βεβαιοτάτη πίστις ἔσται,—ὅτι ἡ ψυχὴ σῶμά ἐστι λεπτομερὲς παρʼ ὅλον τὸ ἄθροισμα παρεσπαρμένον, προσεμφερέστατον δὲ πνεύματι θερμοῦ τινα κρᾶσιν ἔχοντι καὶ πῇ μὲν τούτῳ προσεμφερές, πῇ δὲ τούτῳ· ἔστι δὲ τὸ 〈τρίτον〉 μέρος πολλὴν παραλλαγὴν εἰληφὸς τῇ λεπτομερείᾳ καὶ αὐτῶν τούτων, συμπαθὲς δὲ τούτῳ μᾶλλον καὶ τῷ λοιπῷ ἀθροίσματι· τοῦτο δὲ πᾶν αἱ δυνάμεις τῆς ψυχῆς δηλοῦσι καὶ τὰ πάθη καὶ αἱ εὐκινησίαι καὶ αἱ διανοήσεις καὶ ὧν στερόμενοι θνῄσκομεν1. καὶ μὴν ὅτι ἔχει ἡ ψυχὴ τῆς αἰσθήσεως τὴν πλείστην αἰτίαν δεῖ κατέχειν·

"Next to these points, one must observe, referring back to sensation and feelings—for thus the firmest conviction will be secured—that the soul is a body consisting of fine parts, distributed throughout the whole compound, most resembling wind with a blend of heat, and in some respect resembling the former, in some respect the latter; and there is a <third> part that possesses a great variation in the fineness of its parts even in comparison with these, and is more sympathetic with this blend and with the rest of the compound. All this is revealed by the powers of the soul, its feelings, its ease of motion, its thought processes, and the things of which being deprived we die. Furthermore, one must maintain that the soul possesses the principal cause of sensation.

οὐ μὴν εἰλήφει ἂν ταύτην, εἰ μὴ ὑπὸ τοῦ λοιποῦ ἀθροίσματος ἐστεγάζετό πως. τὸ δὲ λοιπὸν ἄθροισμα παρασκευάσαν ἐκείνῃ τὴν αἰτίαν ταύτην μετείληφε καὶ αὐτὸ τοιούτου συμπτώματος παρʼ ἐκείνης, οὐ μέντοι πάντων ὧν ἐκείνη κέκτηται· διὸ ἀπαλλαγείσης τῆς ψυχῆς οὐκ ἔχει τὴν αἴσθησιν. οὐ γὰρ αὐτὸ ἐν ἑαυτῷ ταύτην ἐκέκτητο τὴν δύναμιν, ἀλλʼ ἕτερον ἅμα συγγεγενημένον αὐτῷ παρεσκεύαζεν2, ὃ διὰ τῆς συντελεσθείσης περὶ αὐτὸ δυνάμεως κατὰ τὴν κίνησιν σύμπτωμα αἰσθητικὸν εὐθὺς ἀποτελοῦν ἑαυτῷ ἀπεδίδου κατὰ τὴν ὁμούρησιν καὶ συμπάθειαν καὶ ἐκείνῳ, καθάπερ εἶπον.

​It would not, however, have acquired this cause, had it not been in some way enclosed by the rest of the compound. And the rest of the compound, having prepared this cause for the soul, itself also received from the soul a share in such an attribute, though not of all that the soul possesses. Wherefore, when the soul is departed, the body does not possess sensation. For it did not itself possess this power within itself, but another thing brought into being along with it provided it, which, straightway accomplishing an attribute of sensation for itself by means of the power brought to completion around it in its motion, imparted it, as I said, to that body as well, in accordance with their contact and sympathy.

“Διὸ δὴ καὶ ἐνυπάρχουσα ἡ ψυχὴ οὐδέποτε ἄλλου τινὸς μέρους ἀπηλλαγμένου ἀναισθητεῖ· ἀλλʼ ἃ ἂν καὶ ταύτης ξυναπόληται τοῦ στεγάζοντος λυθέντος εἴθʼ ὅλου εἴτε καὶ μέρους τινός, ἐάν περ διαμένῃ, ἕξει τὴν αἴσθησιν. τὸ δὲ λοιπὸν ἄθροισμα διαμένον καὶ ὅλον καὶ κατὰ μέρος οὐκ ἔχει τὴν αἴσθησιν ἐκείνου ἀπηλλαγμένου, ὅσον ποτέ ἐστι τὸ συντεῖνον τῶν ἀτόμων πλῆθος εἰς τὴν τῆς ψυχῆς φύσιν. καὶ μὴν καὶ λυομένου τοῦ ὅλου ἀθροίσματος ἡ ψυχὴ διασπείρεται καὶ οὐκέτι ἔχει τὰς αὐτὰς δυνάμεις οὐδὲ κινεῖται, ὥσπερ οὐδʼ αἴσθησιν κέκτηται.

"Wherefore, as long as the soul is present within, it never loses sensation when some other part is removed; but even if some part of it is lost together with the dissolving of the enclosing body, whether of the whole or of some part, provided it remains, it will possess sensation. The rest of the compound, however, though remaining both as a whole and in part, does not possess sensation when that has departed, however great the quantity of atoms contributing to the nature of the soul may be. Furthermore, when the whole compound dissolves, the soul is scattered and no longer possesses the same powers nor moves, so that it does not possess sensation either.

“Οὐ γὰρ οἷόν τε νοεῖν αὐτὸ αἰσθανόμενον μὴ ἐν τούτῳ τῷ συστήματι καὶ ταῖς κινήσεσι ταύταις χρώμενον, ὅταν τὰ στεγάζοντα καὶ περιέχοντα μὴ τοιαῦτα ᾖ, ἐν οἷς νῦν οὖσα ἔχει ταύτας τὰς κινήσεις. [λέγει ἐν ἄλλοις καὶ ἐξ ἀτόμων αὐτὴν συγκεῖσθαι λειοτάτων καὶ στρογγυλωτάτων, πολλῷ τινι διαφερουσῶν τῶν τοῦ πυρός· καὶ τὸ μέν τι ἄλογον αὐτῆς, ὃ τῷ λοιπῷ παρεσπάρθαι σώματι· τὸ δὲ λογικὸν ἐν τῷ θώρακι, ὡς δῆλον ἔκ τε τῶν φόβων καὶ τῆς χαρᾶς. ὕπνον τε γίνεσθαι τῶν τῆς ψυχῆς μερῶν τῶν παρʼ ὅλην τὴν σύγκρισιν παρεσπαρμένων ἐγκατεχομένων ἢ διαφορουμένων, εἶτα συμπιπτόντων τοῖς ἐπερεισμοῖς. τό τε σπέρμα ἀφʼ ὅλων τῶν σωμάτων φέρεσθαι.]

"For it is not possible to conceive it as perceiving when not in this structure and not employing these motions, whenever the enclosing and surrounding parts are no longer such as those in which, being now present, it has these motions. [He says in other works that it is composed of the smoothest and roundest atoms, differing by far from those of fire; and that one part of it is irrational, which is scattered through the rest of the body, while the rational part is in the chest, as is evident from fears and joy; and that sleep occurs when the parts of the soul scattered throughout the whole compound are held within or dispersed, and then collapse along with the supports; and that seed is drawn from the whole body.]

“Ἀλλὰ μὴν καὶ τόδε γε δεῖ προσκατανοεῖν, ὅ τι τὸ ἀσώματον λέγομεν κατὰ τὴν πλείστην ὁμιλίαν τοῦ ὀνόματος ἐπὶ τοῦ καθʼ ἑαυτὸ νοηθέντος ἄν3· καθʼ ἑαυτὸ δὲ οὐκ ἔστι νοῆσαι τὸ ἀσώματον πλὴν τοῦ κενοῦ. τὸ δὲ κενὸν οὔτε ποιῆσαι οὔτε παθεῖν δύναται, ἀλλὰ κίνησιν μόνον διʼ ἑαυτοῦ τοῖς σώμασι παρέχεται. ὥστε οἱ λέγοντες ἀσώματον εἶναι τὴν ψυχὴν ματαΐζουσιν. οὐθὲν γὰρ ἂν ἐδύνατο ποιεῖν οὔτε πάσχειν, εἰ ἦν τοιαύτη· νῦν δʼ ἐναργῶς ἀμφότερα ταῦτα διαλαμβάνεται περὶ τὴν ψυχὴν τὰ συμπτώματα.

"Moreover, one must also understand this: that we speak of the incorporeal, according to the most prevalent use of the term, in reference to that which could be conceived in itself; but it is impossible to conceive the incorporeal in itself except for the void. And the void is able neither to act nor to be acted upon, but merely affords motion through itself to bodies. Therefore, those who say that the soul is incorporeal talk in vain. For it would be able neither to act nor to be acted upon at all, if it were of such a nature; but as it is, both of these attributes are clearly observed concerning the soul.

“Ταῦτα οὖν πάντα τὰ διαλογίσματα τὰ περὶ ψυχῆς ἀνάγων τις ἐπὶ τὰ πάθη καὶ τὰς αἰσθήσεις, μνημονεύων τῶν ἐν ἀρχῇ ῥηθέντων, ἱκανῶς κατόψεται τοῖς τύποις ἐμπεριειλημμένα εἰς τὸ κατὰ μέρος ἀπὸ τούτων ἐξακριβοῦσθαι βεβαίως. “Ἀλλὰ μὴν καὶ τὰ σχήματα καὶ τὰ χρώματα καὶ τὰ μεγέθη καὶ τὰ βάρη καὶ ὅσα ἄλλα κατηγορεῖται σώματος ὡσανεὶ συμβεβηκότα ἢ πᾶσιν ἢ τοῖς ὁρατοῖς καὶ κατὰ τὴν αἴσθησιν αὐτὴν γνωστά, οὔθʼ ὡς καθʼ ἑαυτάς εἰσι φύσεις δοξαστέον4—οὐ γὰρ δυνατὸν ἐπινοῆσαι τοῦτο—

"Anyone, therefore, who refers all these reflections about the soul to the feelings and sensations, remembering what was said at the beginning, will adequately grasp them as embraced in outlines so as to make precise each part on this basis with certainty."Furthermore, shapes, colors, magnitudes, weights, and whatever else is predicated of body as accident, either to all bodies or to those that are visible and knowable through sensation itself, must not be believed to be independent natures in themselves—for it is not possible to conceive this—"

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 10.1.63ὧν στερόμενοι θνῄσκομεν

    A relative clause with the antecedent demonstrative omitted (sc. τούτων). The relative pronoun ὧν is in the genitive of separation governed by the participle στερόμενοι, signifying 'the things of which being deprived we die' (i.e. vital functions).

  2. 10.1.64ἀλλʼ ἕτερον ἅμα συγγεγενημένον αὐτῷ παρεσκεύαζεν

    The subject of παρεσκεύαζεν is ἕτερον ἅμα συγγεγενημένον αὐτῷ ('another thing brought into being along with it', namely the soul), while the object ('this power') is understood from the preceding clause. The following relative pronoun ὃ refers back to this ἕτερον and governs the verb ἀπεδίδου.

  3. 10.1.67ἐπὶ τοῦ καθʼ ἑαυτὸ νοηθέντος ἄν

    An articular participle with ἄν conveying potentiality (= ἐπὶ τούτου ὃ καθʼ ἑαυτὸ νοηθείη ἄν or ἐνοήθη ἄν), meaning 'in reference to that which could be conceived in/by itself'. This sets up the premise that void is the only incorporeal thing that can be so conceived.

  4. 10.1.68οὔθʼ ὡς καθʼ ἑαυτάς εἰσι φύσεις δοξαστέον

    The long series of nouns at the beginning (τὰ σχήματα καὶ τὰ χρώματα...) functions in relation to the verbal adjective δοξαστέον followed by the ὡς-clause. The sentence breaks off dash-style after τοῦτο, to be picked up in the subsequent section (forming the first half of an οὔτε... οὔτε correlation).

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:10.1.63-10.1.68