← Diogenes Laertius

Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers

§10.1.53-10.1.57

Hearing, Smell, and the Primary Properties of Atoms

Epicurus explains that hearing and smell occur via effluences of particles from bodies, arguing that atoms possess only shape, weight, and size and are immutable. He further refutes both infinite division into smaller parts and the presence of infinite particles within a bounded body.

← PrevNext →

ἄνευ γὰρ ἀναφερομένης τινὸς ἐκεῖθεν συμπαθείας οὐκ ἂν γένοιτο ἡ τοιαύτη ἐπαίσθησις. οὐκ αὐτὸν οὖν δεῖ νομίζειν τὸν ἀέρα ὑπὸ τῆς προιεμένης φωνῆς ἢ καὶ τῶν ὁμογενῶν σχηματίζεσθαι—πολλὴν γὰρ ἔνδειαν ἕξει τοῦτο πάσχων ὑπʼ ἐκείνης, —ἀλλʼ εὐθὺς τὴν γινομένην πληγὴν ἐν ἡμῖν, ὅταν φωνὴν ἀφίωμεν, τοιαύτην ἔκθλιψιν ὄγκων τινῶν ῥεύματος πνευματώδους ἀποτελεστικῶν ποιεῖσθαι1, ἣ τὸ πάθος τὸ ἀκουστικὸν ἡμῖν παρασκευάζει. “Καὶ μὴν καὶ τὴν ὀσμὴν νομιστέον, ὥσπερ καὶ τὴν ἀκοὴν οὐκ ἄν ποτε οὐθὲν πάθος ἐργάσασθαι, εἰ μὴ ὄγκοι τινὲς ἦσαν ἀπὸ τοῦ πράγματος ἀποφερόμενοι σύμμετροι πρὸς τοῦτο τὸ αἰσθητήριον κινεῖν, οἱ μὲν τοῖοι τεταραγμένως καὶ ἀλλοτρίως, οἱ δὲ τοῖοι ἀταράχως καὶ οἰκείως ἔχοντες.

​for without some sympatheia conveyed from there, such perceptual awareness would not occur. We must not, therefore, suppose that the air itself is shaped by the emitted voice or by similar things—for it will suffer much insufficiency if it undergoes this from that source—but rather that the blow produced in us when we emit voice immediately effects such an extrusion of certain particles capable of producing a windy stream, which produces the auditory affection in us. "Moreover, one must also believe that smell, just like hearing, would never produce any affection, if there were not certain particles carried off from the object, commensurate for stimulating this sense organ, some being in a disturbed and alien condition, others in an undisturbed and harmonious condition.

“Καὶ μὴν καὶ τὰς ἀτόμους νομιστέον μηδεμίαν ποιότητα τῶν φαινομένων προσφέρεσθαι πλὴν σχήματος καὶ βάρους καὶ μεγέθους καὶ ὅσα ἐξ ἀνάγκης σχήματος συμφυῆ ἐστι. ποιότης γὰρ πᾶσα μεταβάλλει· αἱ δὲ ἄτομοι οὐδὲν μεταβάλλουσιν, ἐπειδή περ δεῖ τι ὑπομένειν ἐν ταῖς διαλύσεσι τῶν συγκρίσεων στερεὸν καὶ ἀδιάλυτον, ὃ τὰς μεταβολὰς οὐκ εἰς τὸ μὴ ὂν ποιήσεται οὐδʼ ἐκ τοῦ μὴ ὄντος, ἀλλὰ κατὰ μεταθέσεις ἐν πολλοῖς, τινῶν δὲ καὶ προσόδους καὶ ἀφόδους. ὅθεν ἀναγκαῖον τὰ μετατιθέμενα ἄφθαρτα εἶναι καὶ τὴν τοῦ μεταβάλλοντος φύσιν οὐκ ἔχοντα, ὀγκοὺς δὲ καὶ σχηματισμοὺς ἰδίους· ταῦτα γὰρ καὶ ἀναγκαῖον ὑπομένειν.

"Furthermore, one must believe that the atoms possess none of the qualities of the phenomenal things except shape, weight, and size, and whatever is of necessity inherently united with shape. For every quality changes, but the atoms do not change at all, since it is necessary that something solid and indissoluble remain in the dissolutions of compounds, which will not make changes into what is not nor out of what is not, but by transpositions in many cases, and by accessions and departures of some. Hence it is necessary that the things which are transposed be indestructible, not having the nature of what changes, but their own particles and configurations; for these are also what must necessarily remain.

“Καὶ γὰρ ἐν τοῖς παρʼ ἡμῖν μετασχηματιζομένοις κατὰ τὴν περιαίρεσιν τὸ σχῆμα ἐνυπάρχον λαμβάνεται, αἱ δὲ ποιότητες οὐκ ἐνυπάρχουσαι ἐν τῷ μεταβάλλοντι, ὥσπερ ἐκεῖνο καταλείπεται, ἀλλʼ ἐξ ὅλου τοῦ σώματος ἀπολλύμεναι. ἱκανὰ οὖν τὰ ὑπολειπόμενα ταῦτα τὰς τῶν συγκρίσεων διαφορὰς ποιεῖν, ἐπειδή περ ὑπολείπεσθαί γέ τινα ἀναγκαῖον καὶ μὴ εἰς τὸ μὴ ὂν φθείρεσθαι. “Ἀλλὰ μὴν οὐδὲ δεῖ νομίζειν πᾶν μέγεθος ἐν ταῖς ἀτόμοις ὑπάρχειν, ἵνα μὴ τὰ φαινόμενα ἀντιμαρτυρῇ· παραλλαγὰς δέ τινας μεγεθῶν νομιστέον εἶναι. βέλτιον γὰρ καὶ τούτου προσόντος τὰ κατὰ τὰ πάθη καὶ τὰς αἰσθήσεις γινόμενα ἀποδοθήσεται.

"For indeed in the things around us that change shape, the shape is received as inherent during stripping away, whereas the qualities do not remain inherently in that which changes, in the way that the shape is left behind, but perish from the whole body. These remaining parts are therefore sufficient to produce the differences of the compounds, since it is necessary that some things at least remain and not be destroyed into what is not. "Yet one must not suppose that every size exists among the atoms, lest the phenomena testify against it; rather, one must suppose that there are certain variations of sizes. For with this also being present, the facts concerning affections and senses will be better accounted for.

πᾶν δὲ μέγεθος ὑπάρχειν οὔτε χρήσιμόν ἐστι πρὸς τὰς τῶν ποιοτήτων διαφοράς, ἀφῖχθαί τε ἅμʼ ἔδει καὶ πρὸς ἡμᾶς ὁρατὰς ἀτόμους· ὃ οὐ θεωρεῖται γινόμενον οὔθʼ ὅπως ἂν γένοιτο ὁρατὴ ἄτομος ἔστιν ἐπινοῆσαι. “Πρὸς δὲ τούτοις οὐ δεῖ νομίζειν ἐν τῷ ὡρισμένῳ σώματι ἀπείρους ὄγκους εἶναι οὐδʼ ὁπηλίκους οὖν. ὥστε οὐ μόνον τὴν εἰς ἄπειρον τομὴν ἐπὶ τοὔλαττον ἀναιρετέον, ἵνα μὴ πάντα ἀσθενῆ ποιῶμεν κἀν ταῖς περιλήψεσι τῶν ἀθρόων εἰς τὸ μὴ ὂν ἀναγκαζώμεθα τὰ ὄντα θλίβοντες καταναλίσκειν2, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὴν μετάβασιν μὴ νομιστέον γίνεσθαι ἐν τοῖς ὡρισμένοις εἰς ἄπειρον μηδʼ ἐπὶ τοὔλαττον.

​For every size to exist is neither useful for the differences of qualities, and visible atoms ought at the same time to have reached us; which is neither seen to occur, nor can it be conceived how an atom could become visible. "In addition to these points, one must not suppose that in a bounded body there are infinite particles, nor of any size whatever. So that not only must division into the infinite in the direction of the smaller be rejected, in order that we may not make all things weak and be forced in our apprehensions of aggregates to consume existing things by squeezing them into what is not, but also one must not suppose that transition in bounded things takes place to infinity, nor in the direction of the smaller.

“Οὔτε γὰρ ὅπως, ἐπειδὰν ἅπαξ τις εἴπῃ ὅτι ἄπειροι ὄγκοι ἔν τινι ὑπάρχουσιν ἢ ὁπηλίκοι οὖν, ἔστι νοῆσαι ὅπως ἂν ἔτι τοῦτο πεπερασμένον εἴη τὸ μέγεθος. πηλίκοι γάρ τινες δῆλον ὡς οἱ ἄπειροί εἰσιν ὄγκοι· καὶ οὗτοι ὁπηλίκοι ἄν ποτε ὦσιν, ἄπειρον ἂν ἦν καὶ τὸ μέγεθος. ἄκρον τε ἔχοντος τοῦ πεπερασμένου διαληπτόν, εἰ μὴ καὶ καθʼ ἑαυτὸ θεωρητόν, οὐκ ἔστι μὴ οὐ καὶ τὸ ἑξῆς τούτου τοιοῦτον νοεῖν3 καὶ οὕτω κατὰ τὸ ἑξῆς εἰς τοὔμπροσθεν βαδίζοντα εἰς τὸ ἄπειρον ὑπάρχειν καὶ τὸ τοιοῦτον ἀφικνεῖσθαι τῇ ἐννοίᾳ.

"For neither is it possible, once someone says that infinite particles or particles of any size whatsoever exist in something, to conceive how this magnitude could still be finite. For it is clear that the infinite particles are of some size; and whatever size these may be, the magnitude also would be infinite. And since the finite has an extremity distinguishable, even if not perceptible by itself, it is impossible not to conceive that what is next to this is also of such a nature, and thus by proceeding consecutively forward, it is possible also in thought to arrive at the infinite of such a kind.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 10.1.53ἀλλʼ εὐθὺς τὴν γινομένην πληγὴν ἐν ἡμῖν... τοιαύτην ἔκθλιψιν ὄγκων τινῶν... ποιεῖσθαι

    An accusative and infinitive construction dependent on δεῖ νομίζειν, contrasted with οὐκ αὐτὸν... τὸν ἀέρα... σχηματίζεσθαι. The accusative phrase τὴν γινομένην πληγὴν serves as the subject of the infinitive ποιεῖσθαι, where the middle voice denotes the direct production of the extrusion from within the agent.

  2. 10.1.56κἀν ταῖς περιλήψεσι τῶν ἀθρόων εἰς τὸ μὴ ὂν ἀναγκαζώμεθα τὰ ὄντα θλίβοντες καταναλίσκειν

    In the purpose clause introduced by ἵνα μή, the subjunctive ἀναγκαζώμεθα governs the infinitive καταναλίσκειν, with the participle θλίβοντες expressing means: 'lest in our conceptual comprehension of aggregates we be forced to consume existing things by crushing them into non-being'.

  3. 10.1.57ἄκρον τε ἔχοντος τοῦ πεπερασμένου διαληπτόν... οὐκ ἔστι μὴ οὐ καὶ τὸ ἑξῆς τούτου τοιοῦτον νοεῖν

    The first part is a genitive absolute (ἄκρον... ἔχοντος τοῦ πεπερασμένου), where διαληπτόν functions predicatively ('having an extremity that is distinguishable'). In the main clause, οὐκ ἔστι μὴ οὐ followed by the infinitive νοεῖν is an emphatic double negative expressing necessity: 'it is impossible not to conceive'.

Model: gemini-3.8-flashurn:cts:greekLit:tlg0004.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:10.1.53-10.1.57