← Tertullian

Against the Valentinians

§6-7

Use of Terms and the Primordial Ogdoad

Tertullian outlines his method of handling Greek names and the satirical tone of his refutation, before diving into the exposure of the Valentinian cosmology, describing the emergence of Mind and Truth from Depth and Silence, and the establishment of the primordial Ogdoad.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§6

​Igitur hoc libello, quo demonstrationem solum praemittentes sumus illius arcani,1 ne quem ex nominibus tam peregrinis et coactis et compactis et ambiguis caligo suffundat, quomodo iis usuri sumus, prius demandabo. quorundam enim de Graeco interpretatio non occurrit ad expeditam proinde nominis formam, quorundam nec de sexu genera conueniunt, quorundam usitatior in Graeco notitia est. itaque plurimum Graeca ponemus; significantiae per paginarum limites aderunt, nec Latinis quidem deerunt Graeca, sed in lineis desuper notabuntur, ut signum hoc sit personalium nominum propter ambiguitates eorum, quae cum alia significatione communicant. quamquam autem distulerim congressionem, solam interim professus narrationem, sicubi tamen indignitas meruerit suggillari, non erit delibationi transfunctoria expugnatio.2 congressionis lusionem deputa, lector, ante pugnam; ostendam, sed non imprimam uulnera. si et ridebitur alicubi, materiis ipsis satisfiet. multa sic digna sunt reuinci, ne grauitate adonerentur. uanitati proprie festiuitas cedit. congruit et ueritati ridere, quia laetans de aemulis suis ludere [quia] secura est. curandum plane, ne risus eius rideatur, si fuerit indignus; ceterum ubicumque dignus risus, officium est. denique hoc modo incipiam.

​Therefore, in this book, in which we are only presenting a demonstration of that secret, lest anyone be clouded by names so strange, forced, patched up, and ambiguous, I shall first point out how we are going to use them. For the translation of some from Greek does not readily yield a convenient form of name in Latin; for some, the genders do not agree with their sex; and for some, the Greek term is more familiar. Therefore, we shall mostly use Greek terms; their meanings will be present at the margins of the pages, nor will the Greek be lacking even in Latin passages, but will be marked in lines above, so that this may be a sign of personal names because of their ambiguities, which share another meaning. However, although I have postponed the conflict, professing in the meantime only a narrative, yet if anywhere their shameful unworthiness deserves to be mocked, the attack will not be perfunctory even in this initial taste. Reader, count this play of conflict as a rehearsal before the battle; I will show, but not inflict, wounds. And if there is laughter anywhere, the subject matter itself will be satisfied. Many things are worthy of being refuted in this way, lest they be burdened with gravity. Jollity is properly conceded to vanity. It is also fitting for truth to laugh, because in her security she is glad to play with her rivals. Care must clearly be taken lest her laughter be laughed at, if it should be unworthy; otherwise, wherever laughter is worthy, it is a duty. Finally, I shall begin in this manner.

§7

​Primus omnium [Ennius] poeta Romanus \'caenacula maxima ca.eIP simpliciter pronuntiauit, elati situs nomine uel quia Iouem illic epulantem legerat apud Homerum. sed haeretici quantas supernitates supernitatum et quantas sublimitates sublimitatum in habitaculum dei sui cuiusque suspenderint extulerint expanderint, mirum est. etiam creatori nostro Enniana caenacula in aedicularum disposita sunt forma. aliis atque aliis pergulis superstructis et unicuique deo per totidem scalas distributis, quot haereses fuerint, meritorium factus est mundus. insulam Feliculam credas tanta tabulata caelorum. nescio ubi illic etiam Valentinianorum deus ad summas tegulas habitat. hunc substantialiter quidem Αἰῶνα Τέλειον appellant, personaliter uero Προπάτορα et Προαρχήν, etiam Bython, quod in sublimibus habitanti minime congruebat.3 innatum inmensum infinitum inuisibilem aeternumque definiunt, quasi statim probent esse, si talem definiant,4 qualem scimus esse debere. sic et ante omnia fuisse (non) ut dicatur, sed ut sit expostulo nec aliud magis in huiusmodi denoto, quam quod post omnia inueniuntur qui ante omnia fuisse dicuntur, et quidem non sua. se<det> itaque Bythos iste infinitis retro aeuis in maxima et altissima quiete, in otio plurimo placidae et, ut ita dixerim, stupentis diuinitatis, qualem iussit Epicurus. et tamen quem solum uolunt, dant ei secundam in ipso et cum ipso personam, Ennoian, quam et Charin et Sigen insuper nominant. et forte accedit in illa commendatissima quiete monere eum de proferendo tandem initio rerum a semetipso. hoc uice seminis in Sige sua uelut in genitalibus uuluae locis collocat. suscipit illa statim et praegnans efficitur et parit, utique silentio, Sige. et quem parit? Nus est, simillimum patri et parem per omnia. denique solus hic capere sufficit inmensam illam et incomprehensibilem magnitudinem patris. ita et ipse pater dicitur et initium omnium et proprie Monogenes. atquin non proprie, siquidem non solus agnascitur. nam cum illo processit et femina, cui Veritas (nomen). [Monogenes, quia prior genitus, quanto congruentius Protogenes uocaretur!] ergo Bythos et Sige, Nus et Veritas prima quadriga defenditur Valentinianae factionis, matrix et origo cunctorum. namque ibidem Nus simul accepit prolationis suae officium, emittit et ipse ex semetipso Sermonem et Vitam. quae si retro non erat, utique nec in Bytho. et quale est, ut in deo uita non fuerit? sed et haec soboles, ad initium uniuersitatis et formati(onem) Pleromatis totius emissa, facit fructum: Hominem et Ecclesiam procreat. habes ogdoadem, tetradem duplicem, ex coniugationibus masculorum et feminarum, cellas, ut ita dixerim, primordialium Aeonum, fraterna conubia Valentinianorum deorum, census omnia sanctitatis et maiestatis haereticae. nescio criminum an numinum turbam,5 certe fontem reliquae fecunditatis.

​First of all, the Roman poet Ennius simply pronounced ‘the greatest chambers of heaven’ (caenacula maxima), either in the name of its elevated site, or because he had read in Homer of Jupiter feasting there. But it is wonderful how many heights of heights and how many sublimities of sublimities the heretics have suspended, raised up, and expanded for the habitation of each of their gods. Even for our Creator, the Ennian chambers are arranged in the form of small shrines. With one after another lean-to built on top, and distributed to each god by as many ladders as there were heresies, the world has been made a lodging house. You would believe the great storeys of the heavens to be the Felicula block. I know not where in that place even the god of the Valentinians dwells, right up to the highest roof tiles. They call him substantially indeed ‘Perfect Aeon’ (Aiona Teleion), but personally ‘Forefather’ (Propatora) and ‘First Beginning’ (Proarchen), and also Bythos (Depth), which was least fitting for one dwelling in the heights. They define him as unborn, immense, infinite, invisible, and eternal, as if they immediately prove that he exists, if they define him such as we know he ought to be. Thus also, I demand not that he is said to have been before all things, but that he actually was; nor do I point out anything more in this sort of thing than that those who are said to have been before all things are found after all things, and indeed not by their own power. Therefore, this Bythos sits in infinite ages past in the greatest and deepest quiet, in the extreme leisure of a placid and, so to speak, stunned divinity, such as Epicurus commanded. And yet, though they wish him to be alone, they give him a second person in himself and with himself, Ennoia (Thought), whom they also call Charis (Grace) and Sige (Silence). And perhaps it happens in that most commended quiet that she prompts him at last to produce the beginning of things from himself. This, in place of seed, he deposits in his Sige, as if in the generative parts of a womb. She immediately receives it and is made pregnant and gives birth, certainly in silence, Sige. And whom does she bear? It is Nus (Mind), most like his father and equal in all things. In short, he alone is sufficient to comprehend that immense and incomprehensible magnitude of the father. Thus he himself is also called ‘father’ and ‘beginning of all things’ and properly ‘Monogenes’ (Only-begotten). And yet not properly, since he is not born alone. For with him there also came forth a female, whose name is Veritas (Truth). [Monogenes, because he was born first, how much more fittingly would he be called Protogenes!] Therefore, Bythos and Sige, Nus and Veritas are maintained as the first tetrad of the Valentinian faction, the matrix and origin of all things. For in that very place, Nus, as soon as he received the office of his own production, himself also emits from himself Logos (Word) and Zoe (Life). If this was not before, certainly it was not in Bythos either. And what sort of thing is it, that in God life should not have been? But this offspring also, emitted for the beginning of the universe and the formation of the whole Pleroma, produces fruit: it procreates Homo (Man) and Ecclesia (Church). You have the ogdoad, a double tetrad, from the couplings of males and females, the chambers, so to speak, of the primordial Aeons, the brother-sister marriages of the Valentinian gods, the entire registry of heretical holiness and majesty. I know not whether it is a crowd of crimes or of divinities, but certainly the fountain of the remaining fecundity.

Syntax notes5 items
  1. 6quo demonstrationem solum praemittentes sumus illius arcani

    'quo' is a relative pronoun in the ablative, referring back to 'hoc libello'. 'praemittentes sumus' is a periphrastic construction (present participle + sum) expressing future intention. 'solum' can be read either as an adjective modifying 'demonstrationem' ('a mere demonstration') or adverbially ('only'). It emphasizes that he is currently only presenting an exposure of the heresy before entering the main battle.

  2. 6non erit delibationi transfunctoria expugnatio

    'delibationi' is the dative singular of 'delibatio' (a tasting, preliminary essay), functioning as a dative of reference or advantage to indicate the present introductory work. The adjective 'transfunctoria' (perfunctory, superficial) modifies the subject 'expugnatio' (attack, conquest).

  3. 7Bython, quod in sublimibus habitanti minime congruebat

    The relative pronoun 'quod' (neuter nominative singular) refers back to the Greek neuter name or concept of 'Bython' (Depth). It is an ironic observation on the logical contradiction in Valentinian cosmology, where a deity named 'Depth' is said to dwell in the highest celestial spheres (in sublimibus).

  4. 7quasi statim probent esse, si talem definiant

    'quasi' introduces a clause of hypothetical comparison requiring the subjunctive 'probent' ('as if they immediately prove'), modifying the main verb 'definiunt'. Embedded within this clause is a conditional 'si' clause also using the subjunctive 'definiant' ('if they should define').

  5. 7nescio criminum an numinum turbam

    A rhetorical play on words (paronomasia) utilizing the phonetic similarity between 'criminum' (of crimes) and 'numinum' (of divinities). Under the grammatical guise of an indirect question introduced by 'nescio... an...', Tertullian ridicules the Valentinian pantheon, suggesting that their incestuous pairings ('fraterna conubia') render this crowd of 'divinities' indistinguishable from a catalog of 'crimes'.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22)urn:cts:latinLit:stoa0275.stoa008.humanitext-lat2:6-7