- Source
- Tertullian. Quinti Septimi Florentis Tertulliani opera, Pars III (Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, Volume 47). Kroymann, Emil, editor. Prague, Vienna, Leipzig: F. Tempsky, G. Freytag, 1906.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:stoa0275.stoa008.humanitext-lat2:21-24
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-27
The critique of the Demiurge's ignorance continues, exposing the Valentinian placement of the devil, the cosmic structure (Pleroma, Middle, and Sevenfold), and the fraudulent physical creation of man with sharp irony.
interim tenendum Sophiam cognominari et Terram et Matrem et, quod magis rideas, etiam Spiritum Sanctum, quasi marem [terram]. ita omnem illi (masculi) honorem contulerunt feminae, puto et barbam, ne dixerim cetera. alioquin Demiurgus adeo rerum non erat compos, de animalis scilicet census inualitudine spiritalia accedere,1 ut se solum ratus contionaretur: ego deus, et absque me non est. certe tamen non fuisse se retro sciebat. ergo et factum intellegebat et factitatorem facti esse quemcumque. quomodo ergo solus sibi uidebatur, etsi non certus, saltim suspectus de aliquo factitatore?
Meanwhile it must be held that Sophia is surnamed both Earth and Mother, and, what you would laugh at more, even Holy Spirit, as if a male. Thus they conferred all masculine honor upon a female; I suppose even a beard, not to mention the rest. Otherwise, the Demiurge was so far from being master of things—scilicet on account of the weakness of his animal status, so as to approach spiritual things—that, thinking he was alone, he harangued: “I am God, and beside me there is none.” And yet he certainly knew that he had not existed previously. Therefore he both understood that he had been made, and that there was some maker of what had been made. How then did he seem to himself to be alone, even if not certain, at least suspecting some maker?
Tolerabilior infamia est apud illos in diabolum, uel quia origo sordidior capit. ex nequitia enim maeroris illius deputatur, ex qua angelorum et daemonum et omnium spiritalium malitiarum genituras notant. et tamen diabolum quoque opus Demiurgi adfirmant et Munditenentem appellant et superiorum magis gnarum defendunt, ut spiritalem natura, quam Demiurgum, ut animalem. meretur ab illis praelationem cui omnes haereses procurantur.
The infamy among them regarding the devil is more tolerable, or because his origin is received as more filthy. For he is deputed to the wickedness of her grief, from which they note the generation of angels and demons and all spiritual wickednesses. And yet they also assert that the devil is the work of the Demiurge, and call him Ruler of the World, and defend him as more knowing of the higher things, as being spiritual by nature, than the Demiurge, who is animal. He well deserves preference from them, for whom all heresies are procured.
Singularium autem potestatum arces his finibus collocant: in summis summitatibus praesidet tricenarius Pleroma, Horo signante lineam extremam. inferius illum metatur medietatem Achamoth, filium calcans. subest enim Demiurgus in Hebdomade sua. magis diabolus in isto nobiscum conuenit mundo, coelementato et concorporificato, ut supra editum est. ex Sophiae utilissimis casibus, qua nec aerem haberet, reciporcandi spiritus spatium, teneram omnium corporum uestem, colorum omnium indicem, organum temporum, si non et istum Sophiae maestitia colasset,2 sicut animalia metus, sicut conuersio eius ipsum Demiurgum. his omnibus elementis atque corporibus ignis inflabellatus est. cuius originalem Sophiae passionem quia nondum ediderunt, ego interim argumentabor motiunculis eius excussum. credas enim illam in tantis uexationibus etiam febricitasse.
But they locate the strongholds of individual powers within these limits: in the highest summits presides the thirtyfold Pleroma, with Horos marking the outermost line. Below him, Achamoth measures out the middle region, treading upon her son. For the Demiurge is placed beneath in his Sevenfold. The devil rather fits with us in this world, co-elemented and co-corporified, as has been set forth above. From Sophia’s most useful disasters, whereby she would not even have had air— the space for breathing, the tender clothing of all bodies, the indicator of all colors, the organ of times—if Sophia’s sadness had not strained out this also, just as fear strained out the animals, and her conversion the Demiurge himself. Into all these elements and bodies, fire was fanned. Since they have not yet published the original passion of Sophia for this fire, I shall meanwhile argue that it was shaken out from her slight feverish agitations. For you might believe that she, in such great vexations, even had a fever.
Cum talia de deo uel de diis, qualia de homine figmenta? molitus enim mundum Demiurgus ad hominem manus confert et substantiam ei capit non ex ista, inquiunt, arida, quam nos unicam nouimus, terra, — quasi non, etsi arida postmodum, adhuc tamen tunc, aquis * ante segregatis, superstite limo succida fuerit3 — sed ex inuisibili corpore materiae, illius scilicet philosophicae, de fluxili et fusili eius, quod unde fuerit audeo aestimare, quia nusquam * est. si enim fusile et fluxile liquoris est qualitas, liquor autem omnis de Sophiae fletibus fluxit, sequitur, ut limum ex pituitis et gramis Sophiae constitisse credamus, quae lacrimarum proinde sunt faeces, sicut aquarum quod desidet limus est. figulat ita(que) hominem Demiurgus et de afflatu suo animat. sic erit et choicus et animalis, ad imaginem et similitudinem factus, quadruplex res, ut imago quidem choicus deputetur, — materialis scilicet, etsi non ex materia. Demiurgus — similitudo autem animalis; hoc enim et Demiurgus. habes duos interim. carnalem superficiem postea aiunt choico supertextam, et hanc esse pelliceam tunicam obnoxiam sensui.
Since such things are fashioned about God or the gods, what sort of fictions are there about man? For the Demiurge, having constructed the world, turns his hands to man, and takes his substance, they say, not from this dry earth which we alone know—as if, although dry afterwards, it had not been damp even then, the waters having been separated beforehand, with the remaining mud—but from the invisible body of matter, namely of that philosophical kind, from its fluid and fusible part, which I dare to estimate whence it was, because it is nowhere. For if fusible and fluid are qualities of liquid, and all liquid flowed from Sophia’s tears, it follows that we must believe the mud consisted of Sophia’s phlegm and rheum, which are likewise the dregs of tears, just as the mud which settles is the dregs of waters. Thus the Demiurge fashions man and animates him with his own breath. Thus he will be both of clay (choicus) and animal, made after the image and likeness, a fourfold thing, so that the clay-made is indeed deputed as the image—namely the material, although the Demiurge is not of matter—and the likeness as the animal; for this also is the Demiurge. You have two meanwhile. They say that a carnal surface was afterwards woven over the clay-made, and this is the tunic of skin, subject to sense.
- 21de animalis scilicet census inualitudine spiritalia accedere
The infinitive accedere is dependent on the context of the Demiurge's cognitive limitation (non erat compos), conditioned by the phrase de animalis scilicet census inualitudine (by reason of the weakness of his animal status), meaning he was unable to approach or grasp spiritual matters.
- 23ex Sophiae utilissimis casibus, qua nec aerem haberet... si non et istum Sophiae maestitia colasset
This is a highly complex conditional sentence in the subjunctive where si non... colasset is the protasis and nec aerem haberet is the apodosis. The relative element qua acts adverbially (whereby), and the flow is interrupted by parenthetical appositions describing the qualities of air.
- 24quasi non, etsi arida postmodum, adhuc tamen tunc, aquis ante segregatis, superstite limo succida fuerit
A concessive and ironical parenthetical clause introduced by quasi non (as if... not). The subject of fuerit (subjunctive perfect after quasi) is the omitted terra, and the sentence is complicated by the concession etsi... and the ablative absolute aquis ante segregatis, forming Tertullian's biblical refutation.
Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-21)
- 2026-09-21 AI review — translation 1
