← Cyprian of Carthage

The Sentences of the Eighty-Seven Bishops

§53-72

Invalidity of Heretical Baptism and Duty of True Baptism

In sections 53 to 72, various bishops systematically declare that baptisms performed by heretics or schismatics are invalid, arguing that those converting to the Catholic Church must receive its sole and true baptism.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§53

​marcellus a Zama dixit: Cum peccata non nisi in ecclesiae baptismo remittantur, qui haereticum non baptizat peccatori communicat.

​Marcellus of Zama said: “Since sins are not remitted except in the baptism of the church, he who does not baptize a heretic communicates with a sinner.”

§54

​Irenaeus ab Vlulis dixit: Si ideo ecclesia haereticum non baptizat, quod dicatur iam baptizatus esse, haeresis maior est.

​Irenaeus of Ululi said: “If the church does not baptize a heretic for this reason, that he is said to have already been baptized, the heresy is greater.”

§55

​Donatus a Cibaliana dixit: Ego unam ecclesiam et unum baptismum eius noui. si est qui dicat esse aput haereticos baptismi gratiam, ante est ut1 ostendat et probet esse illic ecclesiam.

​Donatus of Cibaliana said: “I know one church and one baptism of hers. If there is anyone who says that the grace of baptism is with heretics, he must first show and prove that the church is there.”

§56

​Zosimus a Tharassa dixit: Reuelatione facta ueritatis cedat error ueritati, quia et Petrus qui prius circumcidebat cessit Paulo ueritatem praedicanti.

​Zosimus of Tharassa said: “When the revelation of truth has been made, let error yield to truth, because even Peter, who previously circumcised, yielded to Paul preaching the truth.”

§57

​Iulianus a Thelepte dixit: Scriptum est: nemo potest aliquid accipere, nisi datum fuerit illi de caelo. si haeresis de caelo est potest et baptisma dare.

​Iulianus of Thelepte said: “It is written: ‘No one can receive anything unless it has been given to him from heaven.’ If heresy is from heaven, it can also give baptism.”

§58

​Faustus a Timida regia dixit: Non sibi blandiantur qui haereticis patrocinantur. qui pro haereticis ecclesiastico baptismo intercedit2 illos christianos et nos haereticos facit.

​Faustus of Timida Regia said: “Let those who patronize heretics not flatter themselves. He who, on behalf of heretics, intercedes against the baptism of the church makes them Christians and us heretics.”

§59

​Geminius a Furnis dixit: Quidam de collegis haereticos praeponere sibi possunt, nobis non possunt. et ideo quod semel decreuimus tenemus ut haereticos uenientes baptizemus.

​Geminius of Furni said: “Some of our colleagues may prefer heretics to themselves, but to us they cannot. And therefore, what we have once decreed we hold, that we should baptize heretics who come to us.”

§60

​Rogatianus a Noua dixit: Ecclesiam Christus instituit, haeresim diabolus. quomodo potest habere baptismum Christi synagoga Satanae?

​Rogatianus of Nova said: “Christ instituted the church, the devil heresy. How can the synagogue of Satan have the baptism of Christ?”

§61

​Therapius a Bulla dixit: Qui haereticis ecclesiae baptismum concedit et prodit quid aliud quam sponsae Christi ludas extitit?

​Therapius of Bulla said: “He who concedes and betrays the baptism of the church to heretics, what else has he stood forth as but a Judas to the bride of Christ?”

§62

​Item alius Lucius a Membresa dixit: Scriptum est: Deus peccatorem non audit. haereticus qui peccator est quomodo audiri in baptismo potest?

​Another Lucius of Membresa said: “It is written: ‘God does not hear a sinner.’ A heretic who is a sinner, how can he be heard in baptism?”

§63

​Item alius Felix a Buslacenis dixit: In haereticis sine ecclesiae baptismo admittendis nemo consuetudinem rationi et ueritati praeponat, quia consuetudinem ratio et ueritas semper excludit.

​Another Felix of Buslaceni said: “In admitting heretics without the baptism of the church, let no one prefer custom to reason and truth, because reason and truth always exclude custom.”

§64

​Alius Saturninus ab Auitinis dixit: Si potest antichristus dare alicui gratiam Christi, possunt et haeretici baptizare qui appellati sunt antichristi.

​Another Saturninus of Avitinae said: “If the antichrist can give the grace of Christ to anyone, heretics also can baptize, who have been called antichrists.”

§65

​Quintus ab Aggya dixit: Ille potest dare aliquid qui aliquid habet. haeretici autem quid possunt dare, quos constat nihil habere?

​Quintus of Aggya said: “He can give something who has something. But what can heretics give, who, it is established, have nothing?”

§66

​Alius Iulianus a Marcelliana dixit: Si potest homo duobus dominis seruire, Deo et mamonae, potest et baptisma duobus seruire, christiano et haeretico.

​Another Iulianus of Marcelliana said: “If a man can serve two masters, God and mammon, baptism also can serve two, a Christian and a heretic.”

§67

​Tenax ab Horreis Caeliae dixit: Scriptum est quia Deus unus et Christus unus et ecclesia una et baptisma unum. quomodo illic baptizari aliquis potest, ubi Deus et Christus et ecclesia non est. # ​alius Victor ab Assuras dixit: Baptisma unum est, sed et ecclesiae. ubi ecclesia non est, baptisma illic esse non potest.

​Tenax of Horrea Caeliae said: “It is written that there is one God, and one Christ, and one church, and one baptism. How can anyone be baptized there, where God and Christ and the church are not?” ​Another Victor of Assuras said: “Baptism is one, but also of the church. Where the church is not, baptism cannot be there.”

§69

​Donatulus a Capse dixit: Et ego semper hoc sensi, ut3 haeretici qui nihil foris possunt consequi, quando ad ecclesiam conuertuntur, baptizentur.

​Donatulus of Capsa said: “And I have always felt this, that heretics who can obtain nothing outside, when they are converted to the church, should be baptized.”

§70

​Verulus a Rusiccade dixit: Homo haereticus dare non potest quod non habet: multo magis schismaticus quod habuit amisit.

​Verulus of Rusiccade said: “A heretical man cannot give what he does not have; much more a schismatic has lost what he had.”

§71

​pudentianus a Cuiculi dixit: Nouitas episcopatus effecit, fratres dilectissimi, ut sustinerem4 quid maiores iudicarent. nam haereses nihil habere nec posse manifestum est. adque ita si qui ex eis uenerint, baptizare aequissime iudicatum est.

​Pudentianus of Cuicul said: “The novelty of my episcopate has caused me, most beloved brethren, to wait to see what my elders would judge. For it is manifest that heresies have nothing and can do nothing. And so, if any come from them, it has been judged most justly that they should be baptized.”

§72

​Petrus ab Hippone diarrhyto dixit: Cum baptisma unum sit in catholica ecclesia, manifestum est non posse extra ecclesiam baptizari. et ideo in haeresi intinctos siue in schismate ad ecclesiam uenientes censeo baptizari. oportere.

​Petrus of Hippo Diarrhytus said: “Since baptism is one in the catholic church, it is manifest that one cannot be baptized outside the church. And therefore I judge that those dipped in heresy or in schism, when they come to the church, ought to be baptized.”

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 55ante est ut

    The idiom 'ante est ut' followed by the subjunctive is used to express temporal or logical priority, meaning 'it is prior that...' or 'one must first...'.

  2. 58ecclesiastico baptismo intercedit

    The verb 'intercedere' with the dative ('ecclesiastico baptismo') is used here in the sense of 'to interpose a veto against' or 'to obstruct' the ecclesiastical baptism, rather than its common meaning of intercession.

  3. 69hoc sensi, ut

    The 'ut' clause with the subjunctive functions as an appositive noun clause that explains the specific content of the demonstrative pronoun 'hoc' ('I have felt this, namely that...').

  4. 71Nouitas episcopatus effecit ... ut sustinerem

    The inanimate subject 'nouitas episcopatus' (the novelty of episcopate) leads the causative/consecutive construction 'effecit ut' with the subjunctive ('caused me to wait to see...').

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-22)
  • 2026-09-22 AI review — source 1
urn:cts:latinLit:stoa0104a.stoa013.humanitext-lat1:53-72