- Source
- Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Mommsen, Theodor & Krueger, Paul, editors. Berlin: Weidmann, 1870.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:8.6.17.pr
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-15
Labeo's view that if a person holding the right to draw water goes to the spring during the statutory period for losing a servitude but does not draw water, he also loses the accompanying right of way.
[POMPONIUS libro undecimo ex uariis lectionibus.]
[POMPONIUS, from the eleventh book of Various Readings.]
Labeo ait, si is, qui haustum habet, per tempus, quo seruitus amittitur, ierit ad fontem nec aquam hauserit, iter quoque1 eum amisis.2
Labeo says that if he who has the right of drawing water has gone to the spring during the period in which a servitude is lost, but has not drawn water, he has also lost the right of way.
- 8.6.17.priter quoque
The right of drawing water (haustus) normally presupposes or includes the right of way (iter) to access the spring. Here, although the physical act of passing to the spring took place, the primary purpose of drawing water was not fulfilled; thus, not only the right of drawing water but also the accompanying right of way is lost through non-use.
- 8.6.17.pramisis
The form amisis found in the manuscripts is a scribal error or variant for amisisse (perfect active infinitive). It functions as the infinitive verb in the accusative-with-infinitive construction (Accusativus cum Infinitivo) introduced by the main verb ait, with eum as its subject accusative and iter quoque as its direct object.