- Source
- Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Mommsen, Theodor & Krueger, Paul, editors. Berlin: Weidmann, 1870.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:7.4.6.pr
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-13
It points out that the usufructuary can also seek remedy through the interdict *quod vi aut clam* against the owner's act of building on the site and thereby infringing the usufruct.
[POMPONIUS libro quinto ad Sabinum.]
[POMPONIUS from the fifth book on Sabinus.]
(sed et interdictum quod ui aut clam1 usufructuario competit)2
(but the interdict *quod vi aut clam* is also available to the usufructuary)
- 7.4.6.printerdictum quod ui aut clam
The interdict quod vi aut clam ('what is done by force or stealth'). It refers to a possessory or property-related legal remedy (an interdict) to demand restoration to the original state against someone who, by force (vi) or stealth (clam), made alterations (such as erecting a building) on another's land. Pomponius's remark is inserted as an additional remedy to the preceding text of Ulpian, where the owner extinguished the usufruct of the site by building on it.
- 7.4.6.prcompetit
Third-person singular present active indicative of the verb competo (to belong to, to be available). Combined with the dative usufructuario, it means '(a legal remedy) is available to the usufructuary'. The subject is interdictum.