← Justinian I

The Digest of Justinian

§6.2.6.pr

Undefended Noxal Slave and the Publician Action

Paulus states that if someone takes possession of a slave by order of the praetor because the slave was not defended in a noxal action, and subsequently loses possession, they are entitled to the Publician action.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →

[PAULUS libro nono decimo ad edictum.]

[PAULUS on the Edict, book 19.]

§6.2.6.pr

​Item si seruum ex causa noxali, quia non defendebatur,1 iussu praetoris duxero et amisero possessionem, competit mihi Publiciana.2

​Likewise, if I have led away a slave by order of the praetor on a noxal cause because he was not defended, and have lost possession, the Publician action is available to me.

Syntax notes2 items
  1. 6.2.6.prquia non defendebatur

    Passive imperfect. The subject is the preceding seruum (slave). This refers to the situation where, in a noxal action, the owner refused or failed to defend the slave, leading to the praetor's order to hand over the slave to the plaintiff.

  2. 6.2.6.prPubliciana

    The feminine noun actio (action) is omitted, referring to the Publician action (actio Publiciana). This was a remedy granted to a bona fide possessor who was in the process of usucapion but lost possession before the period was complete.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-07-12)urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:6.2.6.pr