- Source
- Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Mommsen, Theodor & Krueger, Paul, editors. Berlin: Weidmann, 1870.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:4.8.12.pr
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-09
In the case of a conditional submission to arbitration where the condition is pending, the praetor's role is pointed out to be limited perhaps only to extending the deadline of the submission if possible.
[PAULUS libro tertio decimo ad edictum.]
[PAULUS libro tertio decimo ad edictum.]
Quo casu1 ad praetorem pertinebit in eo forsitan solo, ut si possit dies compromissi proferri, proferatur.2
In which case, the intervention of the praetor will perhaps pertain only to this, that if the day of the submission to arbitration can be extended, it should be extended.
- 4.8.12.prQuo casu
A relative adjective referring to the situation described in the preceding section (§4.8.11.4), where the penalty of submission is conditional and the condition is pending.
- 4.8.12.prin eo... ut... proferatur
The demonstrative pronoun eo (ablative case as the object of the preposition in) anticipates the following ut-clause (a substantive clause with the subjunctive present proferatur), meaning "in this [point] only, namely, that... should be extended".