- Source
- Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Mommsen, Theodor & Krueger, Paul, editors. Berlin: Weidmann, 1870.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:4.8.10.pr
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-09
Presents a very brief and fragmentary opinion of Paulus regarding the case where the parties disregard the original arbitrator and choose another.
[PAULUS libro tertio decimo ad edictum.]
[PAULUS in his thirteenth book on the Edict.]
uel alium arbitrum1
or [have chosen] another arbitrator.
- 4.8.10.pruel alium arbitrum
This is an extremely fragmentary text. It is understood by supplying the context from the preceding passage of Ulpianus (§4.8.9.5), where the litigants disregarded the arbitrator's authority and 'went to court or [chose/went to] another arbitrator.' The accusative 'alium arbitrum' functions as the object of an omitted verb (such as 'elegerint' or 'adierint'), or is governed by the preposition 'ad' understood from the previous clause.
