- Source
- Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Mommsen, Theodor & Krueger, Paul, editors. Berlin: Weidmann, 1870.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:4.4.43.pr
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-08
It states that the age of a person claiming to be over twenty-five must be proven after inquiry, as this proof pre-judges the youth's restoration and other cases.
[MARCELLUS libro primo de officio praesidis.]
[MARCELLUS, in the first book on the Office of Governor.]
De aetate eius, qui se maiorem annis uiginti quinque1 dicit, causa cognita2 probandum est, quia per eam probationem in integrum restitutioni eiusdem adulescentis et aliis causis praeiudicatur.3
Concerning the age of one who says that he is over twenty-five years old, proof must be made after due inquiry, because by that proof a prejudicial decision is made regarding the restoration to his original position of the same youth, as well as regarding other cases.
- 4.4.43.prannis uiginti quinque
Ablative of comparison, dependent on the comparative maiorem, meaning "than twenty-five years".
- 4.4.43.prcausa cognita
Ablative absolute. It indicates the legal requirement of "after due inquiry" or "judicial investigation of the case" (causae cognitio).
- 4.4.43.prpraeiudicatur
Impersonal passive of the intransitive verb praeiudicare, governing the datives restitutioni and causis. It means that this proof pre-judges (creates a binding precedent or prejudice for) the subsequent petition for restoration and other legal cases.
Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-07-12) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-21)
- 2026-09-21 AI review — note 1
