- Source
- Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Mommsen, Theodor & Krueger, Paul, editors. Berlin: Weidmann, 1870.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:4.3.19.pr
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-08
The opinion of Neratius and Julian that if a surety kills the promised animal before default and is consequently discharged along with the principal debtor, an action for fraud should be granted against the surety.
[PAPINIANUS libro trigensimo septimo quaestionum.]
[PAPINIANUS libro trigensimo septimo quaestionum.]
Si fideiussor promissum animal ante moram occiderit, de dolo actionem reddi aduersus eum oportere1 Neratius Priscus et Iulianus responderunt, quoniam debitore liberato2 per consequentias ipse quoque dimittitur.
Neratius Priscus and Julianus answered that if a surety should kill the promised animal before default, an action for fraud ought to be granted against him, since, the debtor being released, he himself is also consequently discharged.
- 4.3.19.proportere
The infinitive of the impersonal verb oportet, serving as the main verb of the accusative with infinitive (AcI) construction introduced by the main verb responderunt. The subject of oportere is itself another accusative with infinitive clause: de dolo actionem reddi ("that an action for fraud be granted").
- 4.3.19.prdebitore liberato
An ablative absolute construction consisting of the noun debitor and the perfect passive participle liberato (from liberare), expressing cause ("since the debtor is released"). It describes the legal premise where the destruction of the specific object before default releases the principal debtor, which consequently discharges the surety due to the accessory nature of the guarantee.