- Source
- Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Mommsen, Theodor & Krueger, Paul, editors. Berlin: Weidmann, 1870.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:3.1.9.pr
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-01
Papinian states that a person prohibited from applying for others for a reason not involving infamy is only barred in the province of the governor who passed sentence, and not in other provinces even for the same cause.
[IDEM libro primo responsorum.]
[THE SAME, in the first book of Opinions.]
Ex ea causa prohibitus1 pro alio postulare, quae infamiam non irrogat ideoque ius pro omnibus postulandi non aufert, in ea tantum prouincia pro aliis non recte postulat, in qua praeses fuit qui sententiam dixit, in alia uero non prohibetur, licet eiusdem nominis sit.2
A person who, for a reason which does not impose infamy and therefore does not take away the right of making applications on behalf of all persons, has been prohibited from making applications on behalf of another, does not properly make applications on behalf of others only in that province in which the governor who pronounced the sentence was in office, but in another province he is not prohibited, even though the cause is of the same name.
- 3.1.9.prprohibitus
Perfect participle in the masculine singular nominative, used substantively as the subject of the main verb postulat ("a person who has been prohibited").
- 3.1.9.prlicet eiusdem nominis sit
A concessive clause where the conjunction licet ("although") takes the subjunctive sit. eiusdem nominis is a genitive of description modifying the omitted subject (the preceding causa), meaning "although [the cause] is of the same category."