← Justinian I

The Digest of Justinian

§2.14.55.pr

Agreements by Slaves Subject to Usufruct and the Usufructuary

The text discusses the effects that an agreement made by a slave, who is the object of a usufruct, has on the position and claims of the usufructuary when the debtor or creditor is the usufructuary.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →

[IULIANUS libro trigensimo quinto digestorum.]

[JULIAN in the thirty-fifth book of his Digests.]

§2.14.55.pr

​Si debitor sit fructuarius et paciscatur seruus, in quo usum fructum habet, ne ab eo petatur:1 paciscendo meliorem condicionem eius facit. item si creditor esset fructuarius2 et pactus esset, ne peteret, seruus autem fructuarius pacisceretur, ut peteret: beneficio pacti, quod seruus interposuisset, utiliter ad petitionem admittetur.3

​If a debtor is a usufructuary, and the slave in whom he has the usufruct makes an agreement that no claim be made against him: by making the agreement, he makes his condition better. Likewise, if a creditor were a usufructuary and had agreed not to make a claim, but the slave subject to the usufruct should make an agreement that he might claim: by virtue of the agreement which the slave had interposed, he will be effectively admitted to make the claim.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 2.14.55.prne ab eo petatur

    When the verb petere is accompanied by the preposition ab and the ablative, it means 'to demand (performance) from someone' (petere ab aliquo). Here, combined with the passive impersonal construction petatur, it means 'that no claim be made against him,' where eo refers to the debitor in the main clause.

  2. 2.14.55.prseruus fructuarius

    The adjective fructuarius here does not mean that the slave himself holds a usufruct, but refers to 'the slave who is the object of the usufruct.' It is a restatement of seruus, in quo usum fructum habet from the first sentence.

  3. 2.14.55.pradmittetur

    The subject of the verb admittetur (third-person singular future passive) is contextually the creditor introduced in the conditional clause. It signifies that although the creditor had agreed not to claim, because the slave entered into an agreement that a claim might be made, the creditor himself will be admitted to make the claim.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-07-12)urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:2.14.55.pr