← Justinian I

The Digest of Justinian

§1.8.1.pr-1.8.1.1

Division of Things: Divine Law, Human Law, and Corporality

Gaius discusses the fundamental divisions of things, distinguishing between things of divine law and human law, as well as between corporeal and incorporeal things.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →

[GAIUS libro secundo institutionum.]

[GAIUS, Institutes, book 2.]

§1.8.1.pr

​Summa rerum diuisio in duos articulos deducitur: nam aliae sunt diuini iuris,1 aliae humani. diuini iuris sunt ueluti res sacrae et religiosae. sanctae quoque res, ueluti muri et portae, quodammodo2 diuini iuris sunt. quod autem diuini iuris est, id nullius in bonis est:3 id uero, quod humani iuris est, plerumque alicuius in bonis est, potest autem et nullius in bonis esse: nam res hereditariae, antequam aliquis heres existat, nullius in bonis sunt. hae autem res, quae humani iuris sunt, aut publicae sunt aut priuatae. quae publicae sunt, nullius in bonis esse creduntur, ipsius enim uniuersitatis esse creduntur: priuatae autem sunt, quae singulorum sunt.

​The primary division of things is reduced to two classes: for some are of divine law, others of human law. Of divine law are, for example, sacred things and religious things. Holy things also, such as walls and gates, are in a certain sense of divine law. Now, that which is of divine law belongs to no one’s property; but that which is of human law is usually someone’s property, though it can also belong to no one’s property: for inherited property, before some heir exists, belongs to no one’s property. Moreover, those things which are of human law are either public or private. Those which are public are believed to belong to no one’s property, for they are believed to belong to the corporate body itself; but private things are those which belong to individuals.

§1.8.1.1

​Quaedam praeterea res corporales sunt, quaedam incorporales. corporales hae sunt, quae tangi possunt, ueluti fundus homo uestis aurum argentum et denique aliae res innumerabiles: incorporales sunt, quae tangi non possunt, qualia sunt ea, quae in iure consistunt, sicut hereditas, usus fructus, obligationes quoquo modo contractae. nec ad rem pertinet, quod4 in hereditate res corporales continentur: nam et fructus, qui ex fundo percipiuntur, corporales sunt, et id quod ex aliqua obligatione nobis debetur plerumque corporale est, ueluti fundus homo pecunia: nam ipsum ius successionis et ipsum ius utendi fruendi et ipsum ius obligationis incorporale est. eodem numero sunt5 et iura praediorum urbanorum et rusticorum, quae etiam seruitutes uocantur.

​Furthermore, some things are corporeal, others incorporeal. Corporeal things are those which can be touched, such as land, a slave, a garment, gold, silver, and in short, countless other things. Incorporeal things are those which cannot be touched, such as those which consist in law, like an inheritance, usufruct, and obligations contracted in any manner. Nor does it matter that corporeal things are contained in an inheritance: for even the fruits gathered from land are corporeal, and that which is owed to us by virtue of some obligation is usually corporeal, such as land, a slave, or money; yet the right of succession itself, and the right of usufruct itself, and the right of obligation itself is incorporeal. In the same category are also the rights of urban and rustic estates, which are also called servitudes.

Syntax notes5 items
  1. 1.8.1.prdiuini iuris

    Genitive of quality (description) meaning 'of divine law'. The contrasted phrase humani iuris shares the same construction.

  2. 1.8.1.prquodammodo

    An adverb meaning 'in a certain way' or 'in a sense'. Since 'holy things' (res sanctae) like walls and gates are revered but not strictly dedicated to deities (sacrae) or the departed (religiosae), this qualifying word is added.

  3. 1.8.1.prnullius in bonis est

    Meaning 'is in no one's property' (i.e., owned by no one). nullius is the genitive singular of nemo, and in bonis is a technical Roman law expression for 'belonging to the estate/property of'.

  4. 1.8.1.1nec ad rem pertinet, quod

    Negation of the impersonal expression ad rem pertinet (it is relevant/matters). The subject is the noun clause introduced by quod ('the fact that...').

  5. 1.8.1.1eodem numero sunt

    Literally 'are in the same number (category)'. eodem numero is an ablative of place or manner, here meaning that they belong to the same category of incorporeal things (res incorporales).

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-07-12) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-21)
  • 2026-09-21 AI review — source 1
urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:1.8.1.pr-1.8.1.1