← Seneca the Younger

Moral Letters to Lucilius

§99.9-99.16

The Equality of Death and Rebuke of Affected Mourning

The author argues that human life is extremely short and death is an inevitable certainty for everyone. While he does not forbid natural tears of grief for loved ones, he sharply criticizes the ostentatious and insincere display of mourning performed for onlookers.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§99.9

​Intervallis distinguimur, exitu aequamur. Hoc quod inter primum diem et ultimum iacet, varium incertumque est: si molestias aestimes, etiam puero longum, si velocitatem, etiam seni angustum. Nihil non lubricum et fallax1 et omni tempestate mobilius. Iactantur cuncta et in contrarium transeunt iubente fortuna, et in tanta volutatione rerum humanarum nihil cuiquam nisi mors certum est. Tamen de eo queruntur omnes, in quo uno nemo decipitur. ' Sed puer decessit.' Nondum dico melius agi cum eo, qui cito vita defungitur; ad eum transeamus, qui consenuit.

​We are distinguished by intervals, and equalized by our end. This which lies between the first day and the last is varied and uncertain: if you measure it by troubles, it is long even to a child; if by swiftness, it is narrow even to an old man. There is nothing that is not slippery and deceitful and more changeable than any weather. All things are tossed about and pass into their opposites at the bidding of fortune, and in such a tossing of human affairs nothing is certain to anyone except death. Yet everyone complains of that in which alone no one is deceived. ‘But a child has died.’ I do not yet say that it is better for him who quickly finishes his life; let us pass to him who has grown old.

§99.10

​Quantulo vincit infantem! Propone temporis profundi vastitatem et universum complectere,2 deinde hoc, quod aetatem vocamus humanam, conpara immenso; videbis, quam exiguum sit, quod optamus, quod extendimus. Ex hoc quantum lacrimae, quantum sollicitudines occupant!

​By how very little does he surpass the infant! Set before yourself the vastness of deep time and embrace the universe, then compare this which we call human lifetime with the boundless; you will see how tiny is that which we wish for, which we extend. Out of this, how much tears, how much anxieties occupy!

§99.11

​Quantum mors, antequam veniat, optata, quantum valitudo, quantum timor! Quantum tenent aut rudes aut inutiles anni! Dimidium ex hoc edormitur. Adice labores, luctus, pericula, et intelleges etiam in longissima vita minimum esse, quod vivitur.3

​How much death, before it comes, having been wished for, how much health, how much fear! How much do either ignorant or useless years hold! Half of this is slept away. Add labors, griefs, dangers, and you will understand that even in the longest life, that which is lived is the absolute minimum.

§99.12

​Sed quis tibi concedet non melius se habere eum,4 cui cito reverti licet, cui ante lassitudinem peractum est iter? Vita nec bonum nec malum est; boni ac mali locus est. Ita nihil ille perdidit nisi aleam in damnum certiorem. Potuit evadere modestus et prudens, potuit sub cura tua in meliora formari, sed, quod iustius timetur, potuit fieri pluribus similis.

​But who will concede to you that he is not better off, who is allowed to return quickly, whose journey is finished before weariness? Life is neither a good nor an evil; it is the place of good and evil. Thus he has lost nothing except a gamble that was more certain to result in loss. He might have turned out modest and wise, he might have been shaped for the better under your care, but, which is more justly feared, he might have become like the majority.

§99.13

​Aspice illos iuvenes, quos ex nobilissimis domibus in harenam luxuria proiecit; aspice illos, qui suam alienamque libidinem exercent mutuo inpudici, quorum nullus sine ebrietate, nullus sine aliquo insigni flagitio dies exit; plus timeri quam sperari potuisse5 manifestum erit. "Non debes itaque causas doloris accersere nec levia incommoda indignando cumulare.

​Look at those young men whom luxury has thrown from the noblest houses into the arena; look at those who exercise their own and others’ lust, mutually shameless, of whom no day ends without drunkenness, none without some notable disgrace; it will be manifest that more could have been feared than hoped. You ought not, therefore, to summon causes of grief, nor to accumulate slight inconveniences by being indignant.

§99.14

​Non hortor, ut nitaris et surgas; non tam male de te iudico, ut tibi adversus hoc totam putem virtutem advocandam. Non est dolor iste, sed morsus; tu illum dolorem facis. "Sine dubio multum philosophia profecit,si puerum nutrici adhuc quam patri notiorem animo forti desideras.

​I do not exhort you to strive and rise; I do not judge so badly of you as to think that you must summon all your virtue against this. That is not pain, but a sting; you make it pain. Without doubt philosophy has made great progress, if you with a brave mind long for a boy who is still better known to his nurse than to his father.

§99.15

​Quid? Nunc ego duritiam suadeo et in funere ipso rigere vultum volo et animum ne contrahi quidem patior? Minime. Inhumanitas est ista, non virtus, funera suorum isdem oculis, quibus ipsos, videre nec commoveri ad primam familiarium divulsionem. Puta autem me vetare;6 quaedam sunt sui iuris. Excidunt etiam retinentibus lacrimae et animum profusae levant.

​What? Do I now advocate hardness and want your face to stiffen in the funeral itself, and do not even allow your mind to be contracted? By no means. That is inhumanity, not virtue, to look at the funerals of one’s own with the same eyes as themselves, and not to be moved at the first tearing away of close ones. But suppose that I do forbid it; certain things have their own right. Tears fall even from those who hold them back, and having poured out, they relieve the mind.

§99.16

​Quid ergo est? Permittamus illis cadere, non imperemus, fluat, quantum adfectus eiecerit, non quantum poscet imitatio. Nihil vero maerori adiciamus nec illum ad alienum augeamus exemplum. Plus ostentatio doloris exigit quam dolor: quotus quisque sibi tristis est! Clarius, cum audiuntur, gemunt et taciti quietique dum secretum est, cum aliquos videre, in fletus novos excitantur. Tunc capiti suo manus ingerunt, quod potuerant facere nullo prohibente liberius,7 tunc mortem comprecantur sibi, tunc lectulo devolvuntur; sine spectatore cessat dolor.

​What is it then? Let us permit them to fall, let us not command them; let them flow as much as emotion casts out, not as much as imitation demands. Let us add nothing to our grief, nor increase it according to another’s example. Ostentation of grief demands more than grief: how few are sad for themselves! They groan more loudly when they are heard, and though silent and quiet while it is secret, when they see anyone, they are excited into fresh weeping. Then they lay hands upon their own head, which they could have done more freely with no one forbidding; then they pray for death upon themselves, then they roll off the bed; without a spectator, grief ceases.

Syntax notes7 items
  1. 99.9Nihil non lubricum et fallax

    The double negation (nihil non) expresses a strong affirmation, meaning 'there is nothing that is not slippery and deceitful'. The 'non' modifies the adjective 'lubricum'.

  2. 99.10Propone temporis profundi vastitatem et universum complectere

    Both 'propone' (set before) and 'complectere' (embrace) are imperative forms addressed to the reader. Note that 'complectere' is the second-person singular present imperative of the deponent verb complector.

  3. 99.11minimum esse, quod vivitur

    The clause 'quod vivitur' uses the passive verb 'vivitur' impersonally, introduced by the relative pronoun 'quod' without an antecedent, forming a noun clause that acts as the subject of the infinitive 'esse' in the indirect statement. It literally means 'that which is lived is the absolute minimum'.

  4. 99.12non melius se habere eum

    The phrase 'se habere' (literally 'to hold oneself', meaning 'to be in a certain state') is an accusative and infinitive construction in indirect speech, with 'eum' as the subject accusative. Together with the comparative 'melius' and the negative 'non', it depends on the main question 'quis tibi concedet' (who will concede to you), forming a rhetorical question: 'who will concede to you that he is not better off?' (implying everyone must agree he is indeed better off).

  5. 99.13plus timeri quam sperari potuisse

    An impersonal accusative and infinitive construction. The passive infinitives 'timeri' (to be feared) and 'sperari' (to be hoped) are complementary to 'potuisse' (to have been able), compared by 'plus...quam'. It indicates that it was possible for more things to be feared than to be hoped for regarding the child's future.

  6. 99.15Puta autem me vetare

    The word 'puta' is the imperative (second-person singular present of puto), meaning 'suppose' or 'imagine', introducing a hypothetical scenario. The clause 'me vetare' (that I forbid [weeping]) depends on 'puta' as an accusative and infinitive construction.

  7. 99.16quod potuerant facere nullo prohibente liberius

    The relative pronoun 'quod' refers back to the action of 'capiti suo manus ingerunt' (laying hands upon their own head). The phrase 'nullo prohibente' is an ablative absolute ('with no one forbidding'). The indicative 'potuerant' expresses a past possibility that was not realized (they could have done it more freely when alone).

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-22)
  • 2026-09-22 AI review — source 1
urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:99.9-99.16