- Source
- Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, Vol 1-3. Gummere, Richard Mott, editor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann, Ltd., 1917-1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:98.9-98.18
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-08
Seneca emphasizes the importance of preserving the eternal good amidst mortal transience, citing historical exemplars of virtue, and praises an exceptional old man who practices philosophy by enduring severe illness with a steadfast mind.
Egregie itaque videtur mihi Metrodorus dixisse in ea epistula, qua sororem amisso optimae indolis filio adloquitur: "mortale est omne mortalium bonum." De his loquitur bonis, ad quae concurritur. Nam illud verum bonum non moritur, certum est sempiternumque, sapientia et virtus; hoc unum contingit inmortale mortalibus.
Therefore, Metrodorus seems to me to have spoken excellently in that letter in which he addresses his sister on the loss of her son of excellent disposition: “Every good of mortals is mortal.” He speaks of these goods toward which people run. For that true good does not die, it is certain and eternal, wisdom and virtue; this alone falls as immortal to mortals.
Ceterum tam inprobi sunt tamque obliti, quo eant, quo illos singuli dies turbent, ut mirentur aliquid ipsos amittere amissuri uno die omnia.1 Quicquid est, dominus inscriberis, apud te est, tuum non est; nihil firmum infirmo, nihil fragili aeternum et invictum est. Tam necesse est perire quam perdere, et hoc ipsum, si intellegimus, solacium est. Aequo animo perde, pereundum est.
But people are so wicked and so forgetful of where they are going, and where each day drives them, that they wonder that they lose anything, though they are going to lose all things in a single day. Whatever it is, you are registered as its master, it is in your possession, but it is not yours; nothing is firm to the infirm, nothing is eternal and invincible to the fragile. It is as necessary to perish as to lose, and this itself, if we understand it, is a consolation. Lose with an equal mind, for to perish is necessary.
Quid ergo adversus has amissiones auxili invenimus? Hoc, ut memoria teneamus amissa nec cum ipsis fructum excidere patiamur, quem ex illis percepimus. Habere eripitur, habuisse numquam.2 Peringratus est, qui cum amisit, pro accepto nihil debet. Rem nobis eripit casus, usum fructumque apud nos relinquit, quem nos iniquitate desiderii perdidimus.
What help then do we find against these losses? This: that we hold lost things in memory, and do not allow the fruit we perceived from them to pass away with them. To possess is snatched away, to have possessed never. He is extremely ungrateful who, when he has lost, owes nothing for what was received. Chance snatches the thing from us, but leaves its use and fruit with us, which we lose by the injustice of our longing.
Dic tibi: "Ex istis, quae terribilia videntur, nihil est invictum. Singula vicere iam multi: ignem Mucius, crucem Regulus, venenum Socrates, exilium Rutilius, mortem ferro adactam Cato; et nos vincamus aliquid."
Say to yourself: “Of those things which seem terrible, nothing is invincible. Many have already conquered individual things: Mucius fire, Regulus the cross, Socrates poison, Rutilius exile, Cato death brought by the sword; let us too conquer something.”
Rursus ista, quae ut speciosa et felicia trahunt vulgum, a multis et saepe contempta sunt. Fabricius divitias imperator reiecit, censor notavit. Tubero paupertatem et se dignam et Capitolio iudicavit, cum fictilibus in publica cena usus ostendit debere iis hominem esse contentum, quibus di etiamnunc uterentur. Honores reppulit pater Sextius, qui ita natus, ut rem publicam deberet capessere, latum clavum divo Iulio dante non recepit. Intellegebat enim quod dari posset, et eripi posse. Nos quoque aliquid et ipsi faciamus animose; simus inter exempla.
Conversely, those things which, as beautiful and happy, attract the crowd, have been despised by many and often. Fabricius as general rejected riches, and as censor branded them. Tubero judged poverty worthy both of himself and of the Capitol, when, using earthenware at a public dinner, he showed that a man ought to be content with those things which the gods even now use. Father Sextius rejected honors; though born such that he ought to have entered public affairs, he did not accept the broad stripe when the deified Julius offered it. For he understood that what could be given could also be snatched away. Let us too do something courageously ourselves; let us be among the examples.
Quare defecimus? Quare desperantes? Quicquid fieri potuit, potest, nos modo purgemus animum sequamurque naturam, a qua aberranti cupiendum timendumque est et fortuitis serviendum.3 Licet reverti in viam, licet in integrum restitui; restituamur, ut possimus dolores, quocumque modo corpus invaserint, perferre et fortunae dicere: "cum viro tibi negotium est; quaere, quem vincas."
Why have we failed? Why are we despairing? Whatever could be done can be done, if only we purify our mind and follow nature, from which for one who strays, desiring and fearing are necessary, and serving fortuitous things is necessary. It is permitted to return to the path, it is permitted to be restored to integrity; let us be restored, so that we may endure pains, in whatever way they invade the body, and say to fortune: “Your business is with a man; seek someone you can conquer.”
His sermonibus et his similibus lenitur illa vis ulceris, quam opto mehercules mitigari et aut sanari aut stare et cum ipso senescere. Sed securus de illo sum; de nostro damno agitur, quibus senex egregius eripitur.4 Nam ipse vitae plenus est, cui adici nihil desiderat sua causa, sed eorum, quibus utilis est.
By these discourses and similar ones, that violence of the ulcer is mitigated, which indeed I wish to be softened, and either cured, or to stand still and grow old with him. But I am secure about him; it is our loss that is at stake, we from whom an excellent old man is being snatched. For he himself is full of life, to which he does not desire anything to be added for his own sake, but for the sake of those to whom he is useful.
Liberaliter facit, quod vivit. Alius iam hos cruciatus finisset; hic tam turpe putat mortem fugere quam ad mortem confugere. "Quid ergo? Non, si suadebit res, exibit? "Quidni exeat, si nemo iam uti eo poterit? Si nihil aliud quam dolori operam dabit?
He acts generously in that he lives. Another would already have ended these torments ; he thinks it as disgraceful to flee death as to flee to death. “What then? Will he not depart if the situation advises?” Why should he not depart, if no one can any longer make use of him, if he will do nothing else than attend to pain?
Hoc est, mi Lucili, philosophiam in opere discere et ad verum exerceri: videre, quid homo prudens animi habeat contra mortem, contra dolorem, cum illa accedat, hic premat. Quid faciendum sit, a faciente discendum est. Adhuc argumentis actum est, an posset aliqui dolori resistere, an mors magnos quoque animos admota summittere.
This is, my Lucilius, to learn philosophy in practice and to be exercised for truth: to see what mind a wise man has against death, against pain, when the former approaches and the latter presses. What must be done must be learned from the doer. Up to now, it has been dealt with by arguments, whether anyone could resist pain, whether death, when applied, could submit even great minds.
Quid opus est verbis? In rem praesentem eamus: nec mors illum contra dolorem facit fortiorem nec dolor contra mortem. Contra utrumque sibi fidit nec spe mortis patienter dolet nec taedio doloris libentur moritur; hunc fert, illam expectat.5 VALE.
What need is there for words? Let us go to the actual case: neither death makes him stronger against pain, nor pain against death. Against both he trusts in himself, neither does he patiently suffer pain in the hope of death, nor does he gladly die out of weariness of pain; he bears the former, and awaits the latter. FAREWELL.
- 98.10amissuri uno die omnia
The future participle amissuri agrees with the third-person plural subject implied at the beginning of the sentence (as well as ipsos). This phrase stands in apposition to the subject of the accusative-and-infinitive clause ipsos amittere, yielding a concessive meaning: 'although they are destined to lose all things in a single day.'
- 98.11Habere eripitur, habuisse numquam
The present active infinitive Habere ('to possess') and the perfect active infinitive habuisse ('to have possessed') are used substantively in the nominative case as subjects of the sentence. Serving as subjects of the passive verb eripitur (implied in the second clause), they concisely contrast immediate possession with the permanent reality of past possession.
- 98.14a qua aberranti cupiendum timendumque est et fortuitis serviendum
The dative present participle aberranti ('for one who strays') functions as the dative of agent (dativus auctoris) for the passive periphrastic forms cupiendum (est), timendum (est), and serviendum (est). The relative pronoun a qua refers back to the antecedent naturam ('nature').
- 98.15de nostro damno agitur, quibus senex egregius eripitur
The impersonal construction agitur means 'is at stake' or 'is a matter of concern'. The relative pronoun quibus refers back conceptually to the plural pronoun implied within the possessive adjective nostro ('our'). Furthermore, quibus functions as a dative of separation (dativus separationis) with the verb of taking away, eripitur.
- 98.18hunc fert, illam expectat
When the demonstratives hic and ille are contrasted, hic typically refers to the closer referent in the text, which is the masculine noun dolor (represented by the accusative hunc), while ille refers to the remoter referent, the feminine noun mors (represented by the accusative illam). Thus, it means 'he bears the former [pain], and awaits the latter [death].'
Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-22)
- 2026-09-22 AI review — source 1
