← Seneca the Younger

Moral Letters to Lucilius

§30.10-30.18

The Necessity of Death and Baseless Fears

Seneca praises the philosophical attitude of Bassus in accepting death calmly, arguing that the fear of death is merely due to human preconceptions.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§30.10

​Inter hos Bassum licet numeres, qui nos decipi noluit. Is ait tam stultum esse, qui mortem timeat, quam qui senectutem. Nam quemadmodum senectus adulescentiam sequitur, ita mors senectutem. Vivere noluit, qui mori non vult. Vita enim cum exceptione mortis data est; ad hanc itur.1 Quam ideo timere dementis est,2 quia certa expectantur, dubia metuuntur!

​You may count Bassus among these, who did not wish us to be deceived. He says that one who fears death is just as foolish as one who fears old age. For just as old age follows youth, so death follows old age. He has been unwilling to live, who does not wish to die. For life was given with the exception of death; we travel toward this. To fear it is therefore the part of a madman, because certain things are expected, while doubtful things are feared!

§30.11

​Mors necessitatem habet aequam et invictam. Quis queri potest in ea condicione se esse, in qua nemo non est? Prima autem pars est aequitatis aequalitas. Sed nunc supervacuum est naturae causam agere, quae non aliam voluit legem nostram esse quam suam; quicquid conposuit, resolvit, et quicquid resolvit, conponit iterum.

​Death has an equal and invincible necessity. Who can complain that he is in that condition, in which there is no one who is not? Now, the first part of equity is equality. But now it is superfluous to plead the cause of Nature, who did not wish our law to be other than her own; whatever she has put together, she dissolves, and whatever she dissolves, she puts together again.

§30.12

​Iam vero si cui contigit, ut illum senectus leniter emitteret non repente avolsum vitae, sed minutatim subductum; o ne3 illum agere gratias dis omnibus decet, quod satiatus ad requiem homini necessariam, lasso gratam perductus est. Vides quosdam optantes mortem, et quidem magis quam rogari solet vita. Nescio utros existimem maiorem nobis animum dare, qui deposcunt mortem an4 qui hilares eam quietique opperiuntur, quoniam illud ex rabie interdum ac repentina indignatione fit, haec ex iudicio certo tranquillitas est. Venit aliquis ad mortem iratus; mortem venientem nemo hilaris excipit, nisi qui se ad illam diu composuerat.

​But now, if it has fallen to someone’s lot that old age lets him out gently, not suddenly torn away from life, but withdrawn little by little; oh, surely it behoves him to give thanks to all the gods, because, satisfied, he has been led to the rest necessary for man and welcome to the weary. You see some wishing for death, and indeed more than life is wont to be asked for. I know not which of the two I should think give us greater courage: those who demand death, or those who wait for it cheerfully and calmly; since the former sometimes arises from madness and sudden indignation, while the latter is a tranquility arising from a certain judgment. Someone comes to death angry; but no one receives coming death cheerfully, except him who has long composed himself for it.

§30.13

​Fateor ergo ad hominem mihi carum ex pluribus me causis frequentius venisse, ut scirem, an illum totiens eundem invenirem, numquid cum corporis viribus minueretur animi vigor. Qui sic crescebat illi, quomodo manifestior notari solet agitatorum laetitia, cum septimo spatio palmae adpropinquant.

​Therefore I confess that I came more frequently to a man dear to me for several reasons, so that I might know whether I should find him always the same, and whether the vigor of his mind was diminished along with the strength of his body. And this vigor was increasing for him in the same way as the joy of charioteers is wont to be noted more clearly when they approach the palm-branch in the seventh lap.

§30.14

​Dicebat quidem ille Epicuri praeceptis obsequens, primum sperare se nullum dolorem esse in illo extremo anhelitu; si tamen esset, habere aliquantum in ipsa brevitate solacii. Nullum enim dolorem longum esse, qui magnus est. Ceterum succursurum sibi5 etiam in ipsa distractione animi corporisque, si cum cruciatu id fieret, post illum dolorem se dolere non posse. Non dubitare autem se, quin senilis anima in primis labris esset nec magna vi distraheretur a corpore. "Ignis, qui alentem materiam occupavit, aqua et interdum ruina extinguendus est; ille, qui alimentis deficitur, sua sponte subsidit."

​Indeed, he said, complying with the precepts of Epicurus, first that he hoped there would be no pain in that last breath; yet if there were, that he would have a considerable amount of solace in its very brevity. For no pain is long which is great. Furthermore, that it would help him even in that very separation of soul and body, if it should happen with torture, that after that pain he could not feel pain. And that he did not doubt that the aged soul was on the very edge of the lips, and would not be torn from the body with great force. “A fire which has seized nourishing matter must be extinguished by water and sometimes by collapse; but that which is deprived of fuel subsides of its own accord.”

§30.15

​Libenter haec, mi Lucili, audio non tamquam nova, sed tamquam in rem praesentem perductus. Quid ergo? Non multos spectavi abrumpentes vitam? Ergo vero vidi, sed plus momenti apud me habent, qui ad mortem veniunt sine odio vitae et admittunt illam, non adtrahunt.

​I gladly hear these things, my Lucilius, not as if they were new, but as if I were brought face to face with reality. What then? Have I not watched many breaking off their lives? Indeed, I have seen them, but those have more weight with me who come to death without hatred of life, and admit it, rather than drag it to themselves.

§30.16

​Illud quidem aiebat tormentum nostra nos sentire opera, quod tunc trepidamus, cum prope a nobis esse credimus mortem. A quo enim non prope est, parata omnibus locis omnibusque momentis? "Sed consideremus," inquit, "tunc, cum aliqua causa moriendi videtur accedere, quanto aliae propiores sint, quae non timentur." Hostis alicui mortem minabatur, hanc cruditas occupavit.

​Indeed, he said that we feel that torment through our own doing, because we tremble then, when we believe death is near to us. For from whom is she not near, prepared in all places and at all moments? “But let us consider,” he said, “then, when some cause of dying seems to approach, how much nearer other causes are, which are not feared.” An enemy was threatening someone with death; indigestion anticipated this.

§30.17

​Si distinguere voluerimus causas metus nostri, inveniemus alias esse, alias videri. Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis. Ab ipsa enim semper tantundem absumus. Ita si timenda mors est, semper timenda est. Quod enim morti tempus exemptum est?

​If we wish to distinguish the causes of our fear, we shall find that some are real, others only seem to be. We do not fear death, but the thought of death. For we are always at the same distance from death itself. Thus if death is to be feared, it must always be feared. For what time is exempted from death?

§30.18

​Sed vereri debeo, ne tam longas epistulas peius quam mortem oderis. Itaque finem faciam. Tu tamen mortem ut numquam6 timeas, semper cogita. VALE.

​But I ought to fear lest you hate such long letters worse than death. Therefore I will make an end. You, however, that you may never fear death, think of it always. FAREWELL.

Syntax notes6 items
  1. 30.10ad hanc itur

    Impersonal passive. Literally 'it is gone toward this (i.e., death),' meaning 'we travel toward this.'

  2. 30.10dementis est

    Possessive genitive (genitive of characteristic or duty) with the copula 'est,' meaning 'it is the part of a madman' or 'it is characteristic of a madman.'

  3. 30.12ne

    Affirmative or asseverative particle (often spelled 'nae'). Placed before pronouns in main clauses to mean 'indeed' or 'surely.' It is not the negative particle.

  4. 30.12utros... an...

    Indirect alternative question. It forms an indirect question clause serving as the object of 'nescio,' meaning 'which of the two... or...'

  5. 30.14succursurum sibi

    Future active infinitive (with 'esse' omitted) of the impersonal verb 'succurrit' (it occurs to one, it helps), here in indirect discourse introduced by 'dicebat.'

  6. 30.18ut numquam

    Purpose clause. Instead of the more common negative purpose construction 'ne umquam,' 'ut numquam' is used here to emphasize absolute or permanent negation ('so that you may never').

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:30.10-30.18