- Source
- Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, Vol 1-3. Gummere, Richard Mott, editor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann, Ltd., 1917-1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:120.16-120.22
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-08
Highlighting how we waste our lives with excessive desires despite being bound to mortal bodies, the author cites Horace's satire to expose how ordinary people, unlike the wise, constantly fluctuate and lack self-consistency.
Nunc de capite, nunc ' de ventre, nunc de pectore ac faucibus querimur. Alias nervi nos, alias pedes vexant, nunc deiectio, nunc destillatio, aliquando superest sanguis, aliquando deest; hinc atque illinc temptamur et expellimur; hoc evenire solet in alieno habitantibus.
Now we complain of the head, now of the belly, now of the chest and throat. At one time our nerves, at another our feet vex us, now diarrhea, now catarrh; sometimes blood is in excess, sometimes it is lacking; from this side and that we are assailed and driven out; this is accustomed to happen to those who dwell in another’s house.
At nos corpus tam putre sortiti nihilominus aeterna proponimus et in quantum potest aetas humana protendi, tantum spe occupamus, nulla contenti pecunia, nulla potentia. Quid hac re fieri inpudentius, quid stultius potest? Nihil satis est morituris, immo morientibus;1 cotidie enim propius ab ultimo stamus, et illo, unde nobis cadendum est, hora nos omnis inpellit. vide in quanta caecitate mens nostra sit!
But we, having been allotted a body so perishable, nevertheless propose eternal things and, as far as human life can be extended, so far do we occupy it with hope, content with no money, with no power. What can be more shameless, what more foolish than this thing? Nothing is enough for those who are about to die, nay rather, who are dying; for daily we stand closer to the end, and every hour drives us toward that place from which we must fall. See in how great blindness our mind is!
Hoc quod futurum dico, cum maxime fit, et pars eius magna iam facta est, nam quod viximus.2 Erramus autem qui ultimum timemus diem, cum tantumdem in mortem singuli conferant. Non ille gradus lassitudinem facit, in quo deficimus, sed ille profitetur.3 Ad mortem dies extremus pervenit, accedit omnis. Carpit nos illa, non corripit. Ideo magnus animus conscius sibi melioris naturae dat quidem operam, ut in hac statione qua positus est, honeste se atque industrie gerat, ceterum nihil horum, quae circa sunt, suum iudicat, sed ut commodatis utitur, peregrinus et properans.
This which I say is to come, even as it is happening, and a great part of it is already done; for that which we have lived [belongs to death]. But we err who fear the last day, since each of us daily contributes just as much to death. Not that step on which we collapse makes the fatigue, but it declares it. The last day arrives at death, every day approaches it. Death plucks us away, it does not seize us all at once. Therefore, a great soul conscious of its own superior nature indeed makes an effort to conduct itself honorably and industriously in this post where it has been placed, but judges none of these things which are around it to be its own, but uses them as things lent, as a foreigner and one in haste.
Cum aliquem huius videremus constantiae, quidni subiret nos species non usitatae indolis? Utique si hanc, ut dixi, magnitudinem veram esse ostendebat aequalitas. vero tenor permanet, falsa non durant. Quidam alternis Vatinii, alternis Catones sunt; et modo parum illis severus est Curius, parum pauper Fabricius, parum frugi et contentus vilibus Tubero; modo Licinum divitiis, Apicium cenis, Maecenatem deliciis provocant.
When we saw someone of this constancy, why should there not come upon us the appearance of an uncommon character? Especially if, as I said, consistency showed this greatness to be true. Indeed, consistency remains in true things, false things do not last. Some are by turns Vatiniuses, by turns Catos; and now Curius is not strict enough for them, Fabricius not poor enough, Tubero not frugal enough and content with cheap things; now they challenge Licinus in wealth, Apicius in dinners, Maecenas in delicacies.
Maximum indicium est malae mentis fluctuatio et inter simulationem virtutum amoremque vitiorum adsidua iactatio. Aliquis "habebat saepe ducentos, Saepe decem servos; modo reges atque tetrarchas, Omnia magna loquens, modo "sit mihi mensa tripes et Concha salis puri, toga quae defendere frigus Quamvis crassa queat"; decies centena dedisses4 Huic parco, paucis contento; quinque diebus Nil erat."
The greatest proof of a bad mind is fluctuation, and the constant tossing between the simulation of virtues and the love of vices. Someone “often had two hundred, often ten slaves; now speaking of kings and tetrarchs, all things grand, now saying: ‘let me have a three-legged table and a shell of pure salt, and a toga which, however coarse, can keep out the cold’; if you had given ten hundred thousand to this frugal man, content with few things; in five days there was nothing.”
Homines isti tales sunt, qualem hunc describit Horatius Flaccus, numquam eundem, ne similem quidem sibi; adeo in diversum aberrat. Multos dixi? Prope est, ut omnes sint. Nemo non cotidie et consilium mutat et votum. Modo uxorem vult habere, modo amicam, modo regnare vult, modo id agit, ne quis sit officiosior servus, modo dilatat se usque ad invidiam, modo subsidit et contrahitur infra humilitatem vere iacentium, nunc pecuniam spargit, nunc rapit.
Those men of yours are such as Horatius Flaccus describes this one, never the same, not even like himself; so far does he wander into opposite directions. Did I say many? It is close to being all of them. There is no one who does not change both his plan and his wish daily. Now he wants to have a wife, now a mistress; now he wants to rule, now he acts so that no slave may be more dutiful; now he expands himself even to envy, now he sinks down and contracts himself below the humility of those who are truly prostrate; now he scatters money, now he snatches it.
Sic maxime coarguitur animus inprudens; alius prodit atque alius et, quo turpius nihil iudico, impar sibi est. Magnam rem puta unum hominem agere.5 Praeter sapientem autem nemo unum agit, ceteri multiformes sumus. Modo frugi tibi videbimur et graves, modo prodigi et vani. Mutamus subinde personam et contrariam ei sumimus, quam exuimus. Hoc ergo a te exige, ut, qualem institueris praestare te, talem usque ad exitum serves. Effice ut possis laudari, si minus, ut adgnosci. De aliquo, quem here vidisti, merito dici potest: "hic qui est? "Tanta mutatio est. VALE.
In this way especially is the unwise mind convicted; now one person comes forward, now another, and—than which I judge nothing to be more shameful—he is unequal to himself. Deem it a great thing to act as one single man. But except for the wise man, no one acts as one; the rest of us are multiform. Now we shall seem to you frugal and serious, now wasteful and empty. We continually change our mask and assume one opposite to that which we have stripped off. Demand this therefore of yourself, that, such as you have resolved to present yourself, such you preserve yourself even to the end. Bring it about that you can be praised; if less than that, at least that you can be recognized. Of someone whom you saw yesterday, it can be said with merit: “Who is this man?” So great is the change. Farewell.
- 120.17morituris, immo morientibus
The substitution of the future participle 'moriturus' (about to die) with the present participle 'moriens' (actually dying). This contrast of grammatical forms emphasizes Seneca's view of death not as a future event, but as a process happening in the present moment.
- 120.18nam quod viximus
The relative clause 'quod viximus' (that which we have lived) serves as the subject. The context implies an ellipsis such as '[belongs to death / is already gone]'. It follows 'pars eius magna iam facta est' (a great part of it is already done), indicating that our past life is already in the possession of death.
- 120.18non ille gradus lassitudinem facit, in quo deficimus, sed ille profitetur
'gradus' is the noun. The logic is that the step on which we collapse does not itself create the fatigue ('facit'), but merely declares or reveals ('profitetur') the accumulated fatigue of the journey. 'profitetur' here means to declare or make manifest.
- 120.20decies centena dedisses
The pluperfect subjunctive 'dedisses' (you had given) acts as a conditional clause (independent use of the subjunctive representing a protasis). 'decies centena' is short for 'decies centena milia sestertium', a standard Roman idiom for one million sesterces.
- 120.22unum hominem agere
Derived from the idiom 'agere personam' (to play a role), here meaning to consistently act as one and the same person. It sets a moral goal: while ordinary men play many different roles ('multiformes'), the wise man always plays but one ('unum agit').
