- Source
- Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, Vol 1-3. Gummere, Richard Mott, editor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann, Ltd., 1917-1925.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:119.8-119.16
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-08
Seneca illustrates the misery of an endless desire for wealth using the example of Alexander the Great, and argues that conforming only to the minimal demands of nature brings true inner satisfaction and security.
Inventus est qui concupisceret1 aliquid post omnia; tanta est caecitas mentium et tanta initiorum suorum unicuique, cum processit, oblivio. Ille modo ignobilis anguli non sine controversia dominus tacto fine terrarum per suum rediturus orbem tristis est.
There has been found one who coveted something after having acquired everything; so great is the blindness of minds, and so great is each one’s forgetfulness of his own beginnings when he has advanced. He, who but lately was the master, not without dispute, of an ignoble corner, is sad when, having touched the end of the earth, he is about to return through a world that is his own.
Neminem pecunia divitem fecit, immo contra nulli non maiorem sui cupidinem incussit. Quaeris, quae sit huius rei causa? Plus incipit habere posse, qui plus habet. Ad summam, quem voles mihi ex his, quorum nomina cum Crasso Licinoque numerantur, in medium licet protrahas. Adferat censum, et quicquid habet et quicquid sperat, simul computet; iste, si mihi credis, pauper est, si tibi, potest esse.2
Money has made no one rich; on the contrary, it has inspired in everyone a greater desire for itself. Do you ask what is the cause of this? He who has more begins to be able to have more. In short, you may bring forward for me anyone you please of those whose names are numbered with Crassus and Licinus. Let him bring forward his property rating, and let him compute together both whatever he has and whatever he hopes for; that man, if you believe me, is poor; if you believe yourself, he can become so.
At hic, qui se ad id, quod exigit natura, composuit, non tantum extra sensum est paupertatis, sed extra metum. Sed ut scias, quam difficile sit res suas ad naturalem modum coartare, hic ipse, quem circa dicimus, quem tu vocas pauperem, habet aliquid et supervacui.
But this man, who has conformed himself to what nature demands, is not only beyond the feeling of poverty, but beyond the fear of it. But that you may know how difficult it is to restrict one’s possessions to the natural measure, this very man of whom we speak, whom you call poor, has also something superfluous.
At excaecant populum et in se convertunt opes, si numerati multum ex aliqua domo effertur, si multum auri tecto quoque eius inlinitur, si familia aut corporibus electa aut spectabilis cultu est. Omnium istorum felicitas in publicum spectat; ille, quem nos et populo et fortunae subduximus, beatus introsum est.
But wealth blinds the people and turns their attention upon itself, if a large amount of ready money is carried out of some house, if much gold is smeared even upon its ceiling, if the household of slaves is either select in physique or spectacular in attire. The happiness of all those people looks outward; but he whom we have withdrawn both from the populace and from fortune is happy within.
Nam quod ad illos pertinet, apud quos falso divitiarum nomen invasit occupata paupertas, sic divitias habent, quomodo3 habere dicimur febrem, cum illa nos habeat. E contrario dicere solemus: febris illum tenet. Eodem modo dicendum est: divitiae illum tenent. Nihil ergo monuisse te malim quam hoc, quod nemo monetur satis, ut omnia naturalibus desideriis metiaris, quibus aut gratis satis fiat aut parvo; tantum miscere vitia desideriis noli.
For as far as those are concerned in whose minds preoccupied poverty has falsely usurped the name of riches, they possess riches in the same way as we are said to have a fever, when it has us. On the contrary, we are accustomed to say: ‘A fever holds him.’ In the same way we should say: ‘Riches hold him.’ Therefore I should prefer to advise you of nothing more than this, of which no one is advised enough: that you measure all things by natural desires, which are satisfied either for nothing or for a small cost; only do not mix vices with your desires.
Quaeris, quali mensa, quali argento, quam paribus ministeriis et levibus adferatur cibus? Nihil praeter cibum natura desiderat. "Num tibi, cum fauces urit sitis, aurea quaeris Pocula? Num esuriens fastidis omnia praeter Pavonem rhombumque?"
Do you ask on what kind of table, on what kind of silver, by how well-matched and light-footed servants your food should be served? Nature desires nothing except food. “Do you, when thirst burns your throat, look for golden cups? Do you, when hungry, despise everything except peacock and turbot?”
Ambitiosa non est fames, contenta desinere est; quo desinat, non nimis curat. Infelicis luxuriae ista tormenta sunt; quaerit, quemadmodum post saturitatem quoque esuriat, quemadmodum non impleat ventrem, sed farciat, quemadmodum sitim prima potione sedatam revocet. Egregie itaque Horatius negat ad sitim pertinere, quo poculo aqua aut quam eleganti manu ministretur. Nam si pertinere ad te iudicas, quam crinitus puer et quam perlucidum tibi poculum porrigat, non sitis.
Hunger is not ambitious; it is content to cease; how it ceases, it does not care too much. These are the torments of unhappy luxury; it seeks how it may be hungry even after satiety, how it may not fill but stuff the stomach, how it may recall thirst that has been quenched by the first drink. Excellently therefore does Horace deny that it has anything to do with thirst in what cup or by how elegant a hand water is served. For if you judge that it concerns you how long-haired a boy and how transparent a cup hands it to you, you are not thirsty.
Inter reliqua hoc nobis praestitit natura praecipuum, quod necessitati fastidium excussit. Recipiunt supervacua dilectum: hoc parum decens, illud parum laudatum, oculos hoc meos laedit. Id actum est ab illo mundi conditore, qui nobis vivendi iura discripsit, ut salvi essemus, non ut delicati. Ad salutem omnia parata sunt et in promptu, deliciis omnia misere ac sollicite conparantur.
Among other things, nature has granted us this principal advantage, that she has removed aversion from necessity. Superfluous things admit of choice: ‘this is not very becoming, that is not very highly praised, this hurts my eyes.’ It was so arranged by that founder of the universe who laid down for us the laws of life, that we should be safe, not that we should be luxurious. All things for our safety are prepared and ready at hand; for our luxuries, all things are procured wretchedly and with anxiety.
Utamur ergo hoc naturae beneficio inter magna numerando et cogitemus nullo nomine melius illam meruisse de nobis, quam quia quicquid ex necessitate desideratur, sine fastidio sumitur. Vale.
Let us therefore use this benefit of nature, which should be numbered among the great ones, and let us reflect that she has deserved well of us on no account more than because whatever is desired from necessity is taken without aversion. Farewell.
- 119.8Inventus est qui concupisceret
The subjunctive imperfect concupisceret introduced by the relative pronoun qui forms a relative clause of characteristic, describing a person of such a kind rather than a specific individual. The subject of the main clause (is) is omitted: 'There has been found one who coveted...'
- 119.9potest esse
Ellipsis resolution. It is most natural in this context to supply pauper as si tibi [credis], [pauper] potest esse ('if you believe yourself, he can be [poor]'). Based on the preceding sentence to compute both what he has and what he hopes for, it indicates that no matter how much wealth he has, as long as he desires more, he can still be subjectively or potentially 'poor.' Although some interpret it as supplying dives ('he can be [rich] by your standards'), supplying pauper is more consistent with the contrast of the preceding pauper est.
- 119.12sic divitias habent, quomodo
A metaphorical expression using the correlative sic... quomodo ('possess riches in the same way as...'). The subsequent cum clause with the subjunctive (cum... habeat) represents either a situational circumstance ('when the fever possesses us') or concession ('although it possesses us'). It sharply points out the perversity of human perception, where people think they possess wealth, whereas in fact they are possessed (controlled) by it as if by a disease.
