← Seneca the Younger

Moral Letters to Lucilius

§114.14-114.20

Faults of Composition and Arruntius's Imitation

The author discusses various stylistic errors in composition and provides concrete examples of Arruntius's excessive imitation of Sallust's peculiar expressions, explaining that defects arising merely from imitation do not indicate personal moral corruption or luxury.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§114.14

​Utrumque diverso genere corruptum est, tam mehercules quam nolle nisi splendidis uti ac sonantibus et poeticis, necessaria atque in usu posita vitare. Tam hunc dicam peccare quam illum: alter se plus iusto colit, alter plus iusto neglegit; ille et crura, hic ne alas quidem vehit.1

​Each of the two is corrupted in a different way, by Hercules, just as much as to be unwilling to use any but splendid, sounding, and poetic words, and to avoid those which are necessary and in common use. I would say that this man errs as much as that one: the former cultivates himself more than is right, the latter neglects himself more than is right; the former carries even his shins [trimmed], the latter not even his armpits.

§114.15

​Ad compositionem transeamus. Quot genera tibi in hac dabo, quibus peccetur? Quidam praefractam et asperam probant; disturbant de industria, si quid placidius effluxit. Nolunt sine salebra esse iuncturam; virilem putant et fortem, quae aurem inaequalitate percutiat. Quorundam non est compositio, modulatio est; adeo blanditur et molliter labitur.

​Let us pass to composition. How many kinds will I give you in this, in which errors are made? Some approve a broken and rough arrangement; they purposely disturb it if anything has flowed out a little too smoothly. They do not want a juncture to be without ruggedness; they think it manly and strong which strikes the ear with inequality. For some, there is no composition, but modulation; so much does it flatter and slide softly.

§114.16

​Quid de illa loquar, in qua verba differuntur et diu expectata vix ad clausulas redeunt? Quid illa in exitu lenta,2 qualis Ciceronis est, devexa et molliter detinens nec aliter quam solet, ad morem suum pedemque respondens? Non tantum in genere sententiarum vitium est, si aut pusillae sunt et pueriles aut improbae et plus ausae quam pudore salvo licet, si floridae sunt et nimis dulces, si in vanum exeunt et sine effectu nihil amplius quam sonant.

​What shall I say of that in which words are delayed and, having been long expected, scarcely return at the clausulae? What of that which is slow at the end, such as Cicero’s is, sloping down and gently detaining, and responding, no differently than it is accustomed, to its own manner and foot? The defect is not only in the kind of thoughts, if they are either petty and childish, or improper and bolder than is permitted with modesty safe, if they are florid and too sweet, if they come to nothing and, without effect, sound of nothing more.

§114.17

​Haec vitia unus aliquis inducit, sub quo tunc eloquentia est, ceteri imitantur et alter alteri tradunt. Sic Sallustio vigente anputatae sententiae et verba ante exspectatum cadentia et obscura brevitas fuere pro cultu. L. Arruntius, vir rarae frugalitatis, qui historias belli Punici scripsit, fuit Sallustianus et in illud genus nitens. Est apud Sallustium: "exercitum argenta fecit," id est, pecunia paravit. Hoc Arruntius amare coepit; posuit illud omnibus paginis. Dicit quodam loco: "fugam nostris fecere." Alio loco: "Hiero, rex Syracusanorum, bellum fecit." Et alio loco: "quae audita Panhormitanos dedere ​Romanis fecere." Gustum tibi dare volui; totus his contexitur liber. Quae apud Sallustium rara fuerunt, apud hunc crebra sunt et paene continua, nec sine causa; ille enim in haec incidebat, at hic illa quaerebat. Vides autem, quid sequatur, ubi alicui vitium pro exemplo est.

​Some single person introduces these defects, under whom eloquence then is; the others imitate him and hand them down one to another. Thus, when Sallust was in vogue, amputated thoughts, words falling before expectation, and obscure brevity were held for refinement. Lucius Arruntius, a man of rare frugality, who wrote the histories of the Punic War, was a Sallustian and striving toward that style. There is in Sallust: “he made the army silver,” that is, he prepared it with money. Arruntius began to love this; he placed it on every page. He says in a certain place: “they made flight for our men.” In another place: “Hiero, king of the Syracusans, made war.” And in another place: “which things having been heard, made the Panormitans give themselves ​up to the Romans.” I wished to give you a taste; the whole book is woven with these. Things which were rare in Sallust are frequent and almost continuous in this man, and not without cause; for the former fell into them, but the latter sought them. You see, however, what follows when a defect is an example for someone.

§114.19

​Dixit Sallustius: "aquis hiemantibus." Arruntius in primo libro belli Punici ait: "repente hiemavit tempestas." Et alio loco cum dicere vellet frigidum annum fuisse, ait: "totus hiemavit annus." Et alio loco: "inde sexaginta onerarias leves praeter militem et necessarios nautarum hiemante aquilone misit." Non desinit omnibus locis hoc verbum infulcire. Quodam loco dicit Sallustius: "inter arma civilia aequi bonique famas petit." Arruntius non temperavit, quo minus primo statim libro poneret3 ingentes esse "famas "de Regulo.

​Sallust said: “with waters wintering [stormy].” Arruntius says in the first book of the Punic War: “suddenly the weather wintered [stormed].” And in another place, when he wished to say that it had been a cold year, he says: “the whole year wintered.” And in another place: “thence he sent sixty light cargo ships besides the soldiers and the necessary men of the sailors, with the north wind wintering [storming].” He does not cease to stuff this verb in all places. In a certain place Sallust says: “amid civil arms he seeks the reputations of the fair and good.” Arruntius did not restrain himself from placing, in the very first book, that there were huge “reputations” concerning Regulus.

§114.20

​Haec ergo et eiusmodi vitia, quae alicui inpressit imitatio, non sunt indicia luxuriae nec animi corrupti; propria enim esse debent et ex ipso nata, ex quibus tu aestimes alicuius adfectus. Iracundi hominis iracunda oratio est, commoti nimis incitata, delicati tenera et fluxa.

​These and such defects, therefore, which imitation has impressed upon someone, are not signs of luxury nor of a corrupt mind; for they ought to be personal and born from the man himself, from which you may judge someone’s affections. A wrathful man’s speech is wrathful, an overly excited man’s is hurried, a delicate man’s is tender and flowing.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 114.14ille et crura, hic ne alas quidem vehit

    Meaning "the former depilates even his legs, while the latter does not even groom his armpits." It contrastively expresses excessive physical grooming (excessive ornamentation) and total neglect (excessive simplicity/meanness) in ancient Rome through the metaphor of hair depilation (vellere). The verb vehit functions here as maintaining or carrying oneself in a groomed state.

  2. 114.16Quid illa in exitu lenta

    A construction where the prepositional phrase de and the verb loquar are ellipted from the preceding sentence Quid de illa loquar... All subsequent adjectives and participles agree with the implied feminine accusative singular noun orationem, represented by the demonstrative pronoun illa.

  3. 114.19non temperavit, quo minus... poneret

    The negative of the verb temperare (to refrain) followed by a quo minus clause taking the subjunctive, forming a construction that means "he could not restrain himself from placing..." or "he could not help but place...", expressing the impossibility of self-restraint.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:latinLit:phi1017.phi015.humanitext-lat2:114.14-114.20