- Source
- Titi Livi ab urbe condita libri editionem priman, Pars I-IV, Libri I-XL. Editio Stereotypica. Weissenborn, Wilhelm; Mueller, Moritz, editors. Leipzig: Teubner, 1884-1911.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:6.17.1-6.17.8
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-27
Plebeian resentment grows over Manlius's imprisonment, as they recall past defenders like Cassius and Maelius and criticize the senate. Fearing the mob would break open the prison, the senate releases Manlius, who then becomes the leader of the sedition.
audiebantur itaque propalam voces exprobrantium multitudini, quod defensores suos semper in praecipitem locum favore tollat,1 deinde in ipso discrimine periculi destituat:
Therefore, voices of those reproaching the multitude were openly heard, on the ground that it always raised its defenders to a precarious height by its favor, and then, at the very crisis of danger, deserted them:
sic Sp. Cassium in agros plebem vocantem, sic Sp. Maelium ab ore civium famem suis inpensis propulsantem oppressos, sic M. Manlium mersam et obrutam faenore partem civitatis in libertatem ac lucem extrahentem proditum inimicis. saginare plebem populares viros, ut iugulentur.2
that in this way Spurius Cassius, who was calling the plebs to the lands, in this way Spurius Maelius, who was repelling famine from the mouths of the citizens at his own expense, had been crushed; and in this way M. Manlius, who was dragging out a part of the state, sunken and buried under interest, into liberty and light, had been betrayed to his enemies. The plebs fattened popular men, only that they might be slaughtered.
hocine patiendum fuisse, si ad nutum dictatoris non responderit vir consularis? fingerent mentitum ante atque ideo non habuisse, quod tum responderet; cui servo umquam mendacii poenam vincula fuisse?
Was this to be endured, that a man of consular rank did not answer at the beck of the dictator? Let them pretend that he had lied before, and therefore had nothing to answer then; to what slave was bonds ever the punishment for a lie?
non obversatam esse memoriam noctis illius, quae paene ultima atque aeterna nomini Romano fuerit?3 non speciem agminis Gallorum per Tarpeiam rupem scandentis? non ipsius M. Manli, qualem eum armatum, plenum sudoris ac sanguinis, ipso paene Iove erepto ex hostium manibus vidissent? selibrisne farris gratiam servatori patriae relatam?
Did the memory of that night not present itself, which had been almost the last and eternal one for the Roman name? Did the sight of the army of Gauls climbing up the Tarpeian rock not appear? Did the image of M. Manlius himself not appear, just as they had seen him in arms, covered with sweat and blood, when Jupiter himself had been almost rescued from the hands of the enemy? Was the gratitude to the savior of his country paid with half a pound of spelt?
et quem prope caelestem, cognomine certe Capitolini Iovi parem fecerint, eum pati vinctum in carcere, in tenebris obnoxiam carnificis arbitrio ducere animam? adeo in uno omnibus satis auxilii fuisse, nullam opem in tam multis uni esse?
And would they suffer him, whom they had made almost celestial, and certainly equal to Capitoline Jupiter by his cognomen, to remain bound in prison and, in darkness, to drag out an existence subject to the will of the executioner? Was there indeed so much help for all in one man, and was there no aid for one man among so many?
iam ne nocte quidem turba ex eo loco dilabebatur refracturosque carcerem minabantur, cum remisso eo, quod erepturi erant, ex senatus consulto Manlius vinclis liberatur.4 quo facto non seditio finita, sed dux seditioni datus est.
Now, not even by night did the crowd disperse from that place, and they threatened to break open the prison, when, that which they were about to rescue being conceded, Manlius was released from his chains by a decree of the senate. By which deed, the sedition was not ended, but a leader was given to the sedition.
per eosdem dies Latinis et Hernicis, simul colonis Circeiensibus et a Velitris, purgantibus se Volsci crimine belli captivosque repetentibus, ut suis legibus in eos animadverterent, tristia responsa reddita, tristiora colonis, quod cives Romani patriae oppugnandae nefanda consilia inissent.
During those same days, to the Latins and Hernicians, and at the same time to the colonists from Circeii and Velitrae, who were clearing themselves of the charge of the Volscian war and requesting their captives in order to punish them by their own laws, harsh answers were returned—harsher to the colonists, because they, being Roman citizens, had entered into wicked counsels for attacking their country.
non negatum itaque tantum de captivis, sed, in quo ab sociis tamen temperaverant, denuntiatum senatus verbis, facesserent propere ex urbe ab ore atque oculis populi Romani, ne nihil eos legationis ius, externo non civi conparatum, tegeret.5
Therefore, it was not only denied concerning the captives, but, though they had nevertheless refrained from this toward the allies, they were denounced in the words of the senate to depart quickly from the city, out of the face and eyes of the Roman people, lest the right of embassy, devised for a foreigner and not a citizen, should fail to protect them.
- 6.17.1multitudini, quod defensores suos semper in praecipitem locum favore tollat
multitudini is the dative governed by exprobro (to reproach). The subjunctives tollat and destituat in the quod-clause indicate a subjective or reported reason alleged by the reproachers (exprobrantium).
- 6.17.2saginare plebem populares viros, ut iugulentur
An accusative and infinitive construction in indirect speech. It is most natural to take plebem (accusative) as the subject of saginare (to fatten) and populares viros (accusative) as its object. This corresponds to the earlier structure of raising defenders by favor and deserting them, meaning that the plebs fattened popular leaders only for them to be slaughtered (ut iugulentur).
- 6.17.4quae paene ultima atque aeterna nomini Romano fuerit?
fuerit is in the perfect subjunctive, which, accompanied by the adverb paene (almost), expresses a past potentiality or counterfactual result ("which would have been almost the last...").
- 6.17.6cum remisso eo, quod erepturi erant, ex senatus consulto Manlius vinclis liberator
The cum clause is a "cum inversum" (inverted cum), introducing a sudden historic event after the descriptive imperfects of the main clause. remisso eo is an ablative absolute, where eo (neuter ablative singular) is defined by the relative clause quod erepturi erant (that which they were going to rescue by force).
- 6.17.8ne nihil eos legationis ius, externo non civi conparatum, tegeret
ne nihil... tegeret is a double negative expression meaning "lest it should protect them not at all" (i.e., "so that it might protect them to some extent"). externo is a dative meaning "for a foreigner", and non civi means "not for a citizen". Since the colonists were Roman citizens, the right of embassy (legationis ius) theoretically did not apply to them; they were warned to leave quickly before they lost this protection and faced immediate punishment.
Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25) · Revision history (2, latest 2026-09-22)
- 2026-09-22 AI review — source 1
- 2026-09-21 AI review — source 1
