← Livy

History of Rome

§42.66.1-42.66.10

Arrival of Roman Relief and Retreat of Perseus

The arrival of the Roman relief forces saves the besieged garrison, forcing Perseus to retreat due to his delay and the late arrival of the phalanx. The Macedonian army suffers great confusion in a narrow pass during their retreat, and the consul withdraws after a moderate success.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§42.66.1

​cum in conspectu prima signa suorum circumsessis1 fuerunt, Romanis quidem ab ultuma desperatione recreatus est animus.

​When the first standards of their own people came into the sight of the besieged, the spirits of the Romans indeed were revived from the ultimate desperation.

§42.66.2

​Perseus, cui primum omnium fuerat, ut contentus fortuito successu, captis aliquot frumentatoribus occisisque, non tereret tempus2 in obsidione praesidii, ​secundum, ea quoque temptata utcumque, cum sciret nihil roboris secum esse, dum liceret intacto abire, et ipse hostium adventum elatus successu mansit et, qui phalangem arcesserent, propere misit;

​For Perseus, whose first course of all should have been, satisfied with the accidental success of capturing and killing some foragers, not to waste time in the siege of the outpost, ​and whose second course, those attempts also having been made in some way or other, since he knew that no core force was with him, should have been to depart while it was allowed to go unharmed, yet he, puffed up by his success, both waited for the arrival of the enemy himself and hastily sent messengers to summon the phalanx;

§42.66.4

​quae et serius, quam res postulabat, et raptim acta, turbata cursu adversus instructos et praeparatos erat adventura. consul anteveniens extemplo proelium conseruit.

​which, being moved both later than the situation demanded and in a hurry, was bound to arrive in confusion from the march against those who were drawn up and prepared. The consul, arriving before them, immediately joined battle.

§42.66.5

​primo resistere Macedones; deinde, ut nulla re pares erant, amissis trecentis peditibus, viginti quattuor primoribus equitum ex ala, quam sacram vocant, inter quos Antimachus etiam praefectus alae cecidit, abire conantur.

​At first, the Macedonians resisted; then, as they were in no respect equal, having lost three hundred infantry and twenty-four of the chief cavalry from the squadron which they call sacred (among whom Antimachus, the commander of the squadron, also fell), they attempted to retreat.

§42.66.6

​ceterum iter prope ipso proelio tumultuosius fuit. phalanx trepido nuntio accita cum raptim duceretur, primo in angustiis captivorum agmini oblata vehiculisque frumento onustis haesit.

​But the march was almost more tumultuous than the battle itself. The phalanx, summoned by a panicked message, while being led in haste, first got stuck in the narrow pass, meeting the line of prisoners and the vehicles loaded with grain.

§42.66.7

​ingens ibi vexatio partis utriusque fuit, nullo expectante, dum utcumque explicaretur agmen, sed armatis deicientibus in praeceps inpedimenta — neque enim aliter via aperiri poterat —, iumentis, cum stimularentur, in turba saevientibus.

​There was a huge distress for both sides there, as no one waited until the line could be cleared in some way, but the armed men threw the baggage down the precipice—for indeed the way could not be opened otherwise—and the beasts of burden, when they were spurred on, raged in the crowd.

§42.66.8

​vix ab incondito agmine captivorum expedierant sese, cum regio agmini perculsisque equitibus occurrunt. ibi vero clamor iubentium referre signa ruinae prope similem trepidationem fecit, ut, si hostes intrare angustias ausi longius insecuti essent, magna clades accipi potuerit.3

​Scarcely had they extricated themselves from the disorderly line of prisoners, when they met the royal column and the terrified cavalry. There indeed, the shout of those ordering to carry back the standards created a panic almost like a ruin, so that, if the enemy had dared to enter the narrow pass and pursue further, a great disaster could have been sustained.

§42.66.9

​consul recepto ex tumulo praesidio contentus modico successu in castra copias reduxit. sunt, qui eo die magno proelio pugnatum auctores sint; octo milia hostium caesa, in his Sopatrum et Antipatrum, regios duces; vivos captos circiter duo milia octingentos, signa militaria capta viginti septem.

​The consul, having recovered the outpost from the hill, content with the moderate success, led his forces back to the camp. There are those who assert that a great battle was fought on that day; that eight thousand of the enemy were slain, among them Sopater and Antipater, the royal generals; that about two thousand eight hundred were captured alive, and twenty-seven military standards taken.

§42.66.10

​nec incruentam victoriam fuisse; supra quattuor milia et trecentos de exercitu consulis cecidisse; signa sinistrae alae quinque amissa.

​And that the victory was not bloodless; that over four thousand three hundred of the consul’s army fell, and five standards of the left wing were lost.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 42.66.1circumsessis

    Dative plural of the participle circumsessus (those who were besieged). It functions as a dative of reference or possessor with "in conspectu... fuerunt" (came into the sight of), meaning "into the sight of the besieged."

  2. 42.66.2cui primum omnium fuerat, ut... non tereret tempus

    Here, "cui" is the dative of the relative pronoun referring to Perseus. The "ut" clause ("ut... non tereret...") serves as the subject of "fuerat", with "primum omnium" (first of all) as the predicate. It expresses what his primary duty or best course of action should have been, carrying an undertone of criticism for not having done so.

  3. 42.66.8magna clades accipi potuerit

    The perfect subjunctive "potuerit" is used in the consecutive "ut" clause. Although it represents the apodosis of a past contrary-to-fact condition ("si... insecuti essent"), which would normally require the pluperfect subjunctive ("potuisset"), Livy uses the perfect subjunctive to emphasize the historical actuality of the past possibility (i.e., that a disaster truly could have occurred).

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-21)
  • 2026-09-21 AI review — translation 1
urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:42.66.1-42.66.10