- Source
- Titi Livi ab urbe condita libri editionem priman, Pars I-IV, Libri I-XL. Editio Stereotypica. Weissenborn, Wilhelm; Mueller, Moritz, editors. Leipzig: Teubner, 1884-1911.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:36.5.1-36.5.8
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-11-09
While King Antiochus is at Chalcis, the Eleans ask for his aid against the Achaeans, and the Epirotes send an ambiguous embassy seeking to maintain a cautious balance between the king and the Romans.
cum haec Romae agebantur, Chalcide Antiochus, ne cessaret per hibernorum tempus, partim ipse sollicitabat civitatium animos mittendis legatis, partim ultro ad eum veniebant, sicut Epirotae communi gentis consensu et Elei e Peloponneso venerunt.
While these things were being done at Rome, Antiochus, at Chalcis, lest he should be inactive during the winter season, was partly himself soliciting the minds of the cities by sending envoys, and partly they came to him of their own accord, just as the Epirotes came by the common consent of their nation, and the Eleans from the Peloponnese.
Elei auxilium adversus Achaeos petebant, quos post bellum non ex sua sententia1 indictum Antiocho primum civitati suae arma illaturos credebant.
The Eleans were asking for aid against the Achaeans, whom they believed would first bring war upon their state after declaring war against Antiochus, which had not been declared in accordance with their own wish.
mille iis pedites cum duce Cretensi Euphane sunt missi. Epirotarum legatio erat minime in partem ullam liberi aut simplicis animi; apud regem gratiam initam volebant cum eo, ut caverent,2 ne quid offenderent Romanos.
One thousand infantry were sent to them with Euphanes, a Cretan commander. The embassy of the Epirotes was by no means of a free or straightforward mind; they wished to establish favor with the king, but on the condition that they should take care not to offend the Romans in any way.
petebant enim, ne se temere in causam deduceret, expositos adversus Italiam pro omni Graecia et primos impetus Romanorum excepturos;3
For they requested him not to drag them rashly into the cause, since they, exposed as they were opposite Italy on behalf of all Greece, would be the first to receive the initial attacks of the Romans;
sed si ipse posset terrestribus navalibusque copiis praesidere Epiro, cupide eum omnis Epirotas et urbibus et portibus suis accepturos; si id non posset, deprecari, ne se nudos atque inermes Romano bello obiceret.
but if he himself could protect Epirus with land and sea forces, all the Epirotes would eagerly receive him both into their cities and their harbors; if he could not do this, they begged him not to expose them, naked and unarmed, to the Roman war.
hac legatione id agi apparebat, ut sive, quod magis credebant, abstinuisset Epiro, integra sibi omnia apud exercitus Romanos essent, conciliata satis apud regem gratia, quod accepturi fuissent venientem, sive venisset,4 sic quoque spes veniae ab Romanis foret, quod non expectato longinquo ab se auxilio praesentis viribus succubuissent.
By this embassy it was clear that their aim was that, if—as they rather believed—he should abstain from Epirus, their position with the Roman armies might remain entirely unimpaired, while they had sufficiently secured the king’s favor on the ground that they would have received him if he had come; or, if he did come, there would still be hope of pardon from the Romans, because, not waiting for a distant aid from themselves, they had succumbed to the forces close at hand.
huic tam perplexae legationi quia non satis in promptu erat, quid responderet, legatos se missurum ad eos dixit, qui de iis, quae ad illos seque communiter pertinerent, loquerentur.
Since it was not easy to decide what to reply to this so complicated embassy, he said that he would send envoys to them, who would speak concerning those matters which pertained to them and to himself in common.
- 36.5.2non ex sua sententia
sua is a reflexive pronoun referring to the logical subject of the clause (the Elei, implied in credebant), meaning "not in accordance with their [the Eleans'] own wish." This indicates that the war declared by the Achaeans against Antiochus was contrary to the will of the Eleans.
- 36.5.3cum eo, ut caverent
The phrase cum eo, ut followed by the subjunctive (caverent) is an idiomatic Latin construction meaning "on the condition that" or "with the proviso that."
- 36.5.4expositos adversus Italiam ... excepturos
An accusative and infinitive construction (se excepturos [esse]), with the participle expositos agreeing with the subject se. It functions as an explanation or justification for their request to the king not to involve them.
- 36.5.6ut sive ... abstinuisset ... sive venisset
A complex double conditional structure introduced by ut ("so that"), which contrasts two past-unreal hypotheses: sive abstinuisset (if he should stay away) and sive venisset (or if he should come, in 36.5.7), explaining the double-sided strategy of the Epirotes.
Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-21)
- 2026-09-21 AI review — translation 1
