← Livy

History of Rome

§2.35.1-2.35.8

The Trial and Exile of Coriolanus to the Volsci

Coriolanus incites the anger of the plebs and is summoned to trial by the tribunes. He refuses to appear, goes into exile among the Volscians, and schemes with their leader, Attius Tullus, to initiate a war against Rome.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§2.35.1

​et senatui nimis atrox visa sententia est, et plebem ira prope armavit: fame se iam sicut hostes peti,1 cibo victuque fraudari; peregrinum frumentum, quae sola alimenta ex insperato fortuna dederit, ab ore rapi, nisi Cn. Marcio vincti dedantur tribuni, nisi de tergo plebis Romanae satisfiat.2 eum sibi carnificem novum exortum, qui aut mori aut servire iubeat.

​The opinion seemed too harsh even to the senate, and it almost armed the plebs with anger: they complained that they were now being attacked by famine like enemies, defrauded of food and sustenance; that foreign corn, the only nourishment which fortune had unexpectedly given them, was being snatched from their mouths, unless the tribunes were delivered up in chains to Gnaeus Marcius, and unless satisfaction was made upon the backs of the Roman plebeians; and that he had arisen as a new executioner for them, who ordered them either to die or to be slaves.

§2.35.2

​in exeuntem e curia impetus factus esset, ni peropportune tribuni diem dixissent. ibi ira est suppressa: se iudicem quisque, se dominum vitae necisque inimici factum videbat.

​An attack would have been made upon him as he was leaving the senate house, had not the tribunes very opportunely appointed a day for his trial. Thereupon their anger was suppressed: each man saw himself made a judge, each the master of the life and death of his enemy.

§2.35.3

​contemptim primo Marcius audiebat minas tribunicias: auxilii, non poenae ius datum illi potestati, plebisque non patrum tribunos esse. sed adeo infensa erat coorta plebs, ut unius poena defungendum esset patribus.3

​At first Marcius heard the tribunician threats with contempt: he argued that the right of aid, not of punishment, had been given to that power, and that they were tribunes of the plebs, not of the patricians. But the plebs had risen up in such hostile fashion that the patricians had to get off by the punishment of one man.

§2.35.4

​restiterunt tamen adversae invidiae usique sunt qua suis quisque, qua totius ordinis viribus. ac primo temptata res est, si dispositis clientibus absterrendo singulos a coitionibus conciliisque disicere rem possent.

​They nevertheless resisted the adverse hatred and used, now the strength of each individual, now that of the whole order. And first the attempt was made to see if, by posting their clients, they could break up the matter by frightening individuals away from gatherings and councils.

§2.35.5

​universi deinde processere — quidquid erat patrum, reos diceres4 — precibus plebem exposcentes, unum sibi civem, unum senatorem, si innocentem absolvere nollent, pro nocente donarent.

​Then they went forth in a body — you would have called all the patricians there defendants — entreating the plebs with prayers that, if they would not acquit him as innocent, they would grant them one citizen, one senator, even as a guilty person.

§2.35.6

​ipse cum die dicta non adesset, perseveratum in ira est. damnatus absens in Volscos exulatum abiit minitans patriae hostilesque iam tum spiritus gerens. Venientem Volsci benigne excepere benigniusque in dies colebant, quo maior ira in suos eminebat, crebraeque nunc querellae, nunc minae percipiebantur. hospitio utebatur Atti Tulli.

​When he himself did not appear on the appointed day, the anger persisted. Condemned in his absence, he went into exile to the Volscians, threatening his country and even then bearing a hostile spirit. The Volscians received him kindly as he came, and treated him more kindly day by day, the more his greater anger against his own people shone forth, and now frequent complaints, now threats were perceived. He enjoyed the hospitality of Attius Tullus.

§2.35.7

​longe is tum princeps Volsci nominis erat Romanisque semper infestus. ita cum alterum vetus odium, alterum ira recens stimularet, consilia conferunt de Romano bello.

​He was at that time by far the chief man of the Volscian name and always hostile to the Romans. Thus, since an old hatred stimulated the one, and a recent anger the other, they conferred plans about a Roman war.

§2.35.8

​haud facile credebant plebem suam inpelli posse, ut totiens infeliciter temptata arma caperent: multis saepe bellis, pestilentia postremo amissa iuventute fractos spiritus esse; arte agendum5 in exoleto iam vetustate odio, ut recenti aliqua ira exacerbarentur animi.

​They did not easily believe that their own plebs could be induced to take up arms which had been so often unsuccessfully tried: that their spirits were broken by many frequent wars and finally by the loss of their youth through pestilence; they thought that they must act with artifice upon a hatred now faded by age, so that their minds might be exacerbated by some recent anger.

Syntax notes5 items
  1. 2.35.1fame se iam sicut hostes peti

    An Accusative with Infinitive construction in Oratio Obliqua representing the complaints of the plebeians, with the governing verb of speaking or thinking implied from the context.

  2. 2.35.1nisi de tergo plebis Romanae satisfiat

    de tergo (from the back) metaphorically refers to corporal punishment such as flogging. Combined with the impersonal passive satisfiat (satisfaction be made), it means 'unless satisfaction is obtained through the flogging of the backs of the Roman plebeians.'

  3. 2.35.3ut unius poena defungendum esset patribus

    The verb defungi (to escape, get off) governs the ablative, which is unius poena. defungendum esset is an impersonal passive periphrastic construction of necessity, with the dative patribus acting as the agent.

  4. 2.35.5reos diceres

    The second-person singular imperfect subjunctive diceres is used as a potential subjunctive to refer to an indefinite observer ('you would have said they were defendants').

  5. 2.35.8arte agendum

    An impersonal passive periphrastic construction in indirect speech (with esse omitted from agendum esse). Combined with the ablative of manner arte, it means '(they thought) they must act with artifice.'

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:2.35.1-2.35.8