← Livy

History of Rome

§10.39.1-10.39.17

Advance of the Consuls and Papirius's Address

The consuls set out from Rome; Carvilius captures Amiternum and Papirius storms Duronia, after which they face the Samnites at Cominium and Aquilonia respectively. Papirius coordinates with his colleague for the upcoming battle and delivers a powerful speech to his troops, dismissing the enemy's splendid armor as empty show and highlighting their impious state.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§10.39.1

​consules profecti ab urbe, prior Sp. Carvilius, cui veteres legiones, quas M. Atilius, superioris anni consul, in agro Interamnati reliquerat, decretae erant.

​The consuls set out from the city, first Spurius Carvilius, to whom the old legions, which Marcus Atilius, consul of the previous year, had left in the territory of Interamna, had been assigned.

§10.39.2

​cum eis in Samnium profectus, dum hostes operati superstitionibus1 concilia secreta agunt, Amiternum oppidum de Samnitibus vi cepit.

​Setting out with them into Samnium, while the enemy, occupied with their superstitions, were holding secret councils, he took the town of Amiternum from the Samnites by force.

§10.39.3

​caesa ibi milia hominum duo ferme atque octingenti, capta quattuor milia ducenti septuaginta.

​About two thousand eight hundred men were slain there, and four thousand two hundred and seventy were captured.

§10.39.4

​Papirius novo exercitu — ita enim decretum erat — scripto Duroniam urbem expugnavit. minus quam collega cepit hominum, plus aliquanto occidit; praeda opulenta utrobique est parta. inde pervagati Samnium consules, ​maxime depopulato Atinate agro, Carvilius ad Cominium, Papirius ad Aquiloniam, ubi summa rei Samnitium erat, pervenit.

​Papirius, with a newly enlisted army—for so it had been decreed—stormed the city of Duronia. He took fewer men than his colleague, but killed somewhat more; rich booty was acquired on both sides. From there, the consuls, having traversed Samnium, ​especially after devastating the territory of Atina, Carvilius arrived at Cominium, and Papirius at Aquilonia, where the main strength of the Samnites was.

§10.39.6

​ibi aliquamdiu nec cessatum ab armis est neque naviter pugnatum; lacessendo quietos, resistentibus cedendo comminandoque magis quam inferendo pugnam dies absumebatur.

​There, for some time, there was neither a cessation of arms nor active fighting; by provoking the quiet, yielding to those who resisted, and threatening rather than delivering battle, the day was consumed.

§10.39.7

​quodcumque inciperetur remittereturque, omnium rerum, etiam parvarum, eventus perferebatur in dies. altera Romana castra, quae viginti milium spatio aberant, et absentis collegae consilia omnibus gerendis intererant rebus, intentiorque Carvilius, quo maiore discrimine res vertebatur,2 in Aquiloniam quam ad Cominium, quod obsidebat, erat. L. Papirius, ​iam per omnia ad dimicandum satis paratus, nuntium ad collegam mittit sibi in animo esse postero die, si per auspicia liceret, confligere cum hoste;

​Whatever was begun or broken off, the outcome of all things, even small ones, was reported daily. The other Roman camp, which was twenty miles away, and the plans of the absent colleague were involved in the conduct of all affairs; and Carvilius, as the crisis took a more critical turn, was more intent on Aquilonia than on Cominium, which he was besieging. Lucius Papirius, ​now sufficiently prepared in all respects for a conflict, sent a messenger to his colleague to say that he intended to engage with the enemy on the following day, if the auspices permitted;

§10.39.9

​opus esse et illum, quanta maxuma vi posset, Cominium oppugnare, ne quid laxamenti sit Samnitibus ad subsidia Aquiloniam mittenda.

​it was necessary that he too should attack Cominium with the greatest possible force, so that there would be no leisure for the Samnites to send reinforcements to Aquilonia.

§10.39.10

​diem ad proficiscendum nuntius habuit; nocte rediit, adprobare collegam consulta referens. Papirius nuntio misso extemplo contionem habuit;

​The messenger had the day for his journey; he returned at night, reporting that his colleague approved of the plans. Papirius, having dispatched the messenger, immediately held an assembly;

§10.39.11

​multa de universo genere belli, multa de praesenti hostium apparatu, vana magis specie quam efficaci ad eventum, disseruit:

​he spoke much on the general nature of the war, much on the present equipment of the enemy, which was more in vain show than effective for the result:

§10.39.12

​non enim cristas vulnera facere,3 et per picta atque aurata scuta transire Romanum pilum, et candore tunicarum fulgentem aciem, ubi res ferro geratur, cruentari.

​for crests did not inflict wounds, and the Roman javelin passed through painted and gilded shields, and a battle-line glittering with the whiteness of tunics would be stained with blood when the business was carried on with steel.

§10.39.13

​auream olim atque argentean Samnitium aciem a parente suo occidione occisam spoliaque ea honestiora victori hosti quam ipsis arma fuisse.

​Once before, a golden and silver battle-line of the Samnites had been utterly destroyed by his father, and those spoils had been more honorable to the victorious enemy than the arms themselves had been to them.

§10.39.14

​datum hoc forsan nomini familiaeque suae, ut adversus maximos conatus Samnitium opponerentur duces spoliaque ea referrent, quae insignia publicis etiam locis decorandis essent.

​It was granted perhaps to his name and family that generals should be opposed to the greatest efforts of the Samnites, and should bring back those spoils which were distinguished even for decorating public places.

§10.39.15

​deos inmortales cum iratos adesse propter totiens petita foedera, totiens rupta, tur, si qua coniectura mentis divinae sit, nulli umquam exercitui fuisse infestiores, ​quam qui4 nefando sacro mixta hominum pecudumque caede respersus, ancipiti deum irae devotus, hinc foederum cum Romanis ictorum testes deos, ​hinc iuris iurandi adversus foedera suscepti execrationes horrens, invitus iuraverit, oderit sacramentum, uno tempore deos, cives, hostes metuat.

​The immortal gods were present in anger on account of treaties so often sought and so often broken; and if there was any conjecture of the divine mind, they had never been more hostile to any army ​than to that which, defiled by a dreadful rite with the mingled slaughter of men and beasts, and devoted to the double wrath of the gods, fearing on one hand the gods who were witnesses of the treaties struck with the Romans, ​and on the other hand the curses of the oath taken against the treaties, had sworn unwillingly, hated the oath, and feared at one and the same time the gods, their citizens, and the enemy.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 10.39.2operati superstitionibus

    The perfect participle operatus (from operari) is used here with a present meaning, expressing a state of being busy or occupied with something. The noun superstitionibus is in the ablative (or dative) case, indicating the object of their occupation.

  2. 10.39.7quo maiore discrimine res vertebatur

    The pronoun quo is an ablative of measure of difference, used in conjunction with the comparative maiore to indicate proportion ('the more...'). The phrase res vertebatur means 'the situation was turning (towards)'.

  3. 10.39.12non enim cristas vulnera facere

    This marks the beginning of the accusative and infinitive (A.C.I.) construction in indirect discourse (Oratio Obliqua), depending on disseruit in §10.39.11. Here, cristas is the accusative subject of the infinitive, vulnera is the accusative object, and facere is the infinitive. This structure continues under the rules of indirect speech until metuat (subjunctive) in §10.39.17.

  4. 10.39.15fuisse infestiores, quam qui

    The comparative adverb/adjective infestiores is followed by quam in a comparative clause. The antecedent of qui (and the noun phrase it modifies) is omitted, effectively forming a construction meaning 'more hostile [to that army] than [to any army] which...'.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25) · Revision history (1, latest 2026-09-22)
  • 2026-09-22 AI review — source 1
urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:10.39.1-10.39.17