← Livy

History of Rome

§1.26.1-1.26.14

Trial and Acquittal of Horatius for Sister's Murder

Horatius is put on trial for the murder of his sister, but due to his father's appeals and his own outstanding merits, he is acquitted by the people and undergoes a public expiation.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§1.26.1

​priusquam inde digrederentur, roganti Mettio, ex foedere icto quid imperaret, imperat Tullus, uti iuventutem in armis habeat; usurum se eorum opera,1 si bellum cum Veientibus foret. ita exercitus inde domos abducti.

​Before they departed thence, to Mettius asking what he commanded according to the struck treaty, Tullus commands that he keep the youth under arms; [saying that] he would use their service if there should be war with the Veientes. Thus the armies were led away thence to their homes.

§1.26.2

​princeps Horatius ibat trigemina spolia prae se gerens; cui soror virgo, quae desponsa uni ex Curiatiis fuerat, obvia ante portam Capenam fuit; cognitoque super umeros fratris paludamento sponsi, quod ipsa confecerat, solvit crines et flebiliter nomine sponsum mortuum appellat.

​Horatius went at the head, carrying the triple spoils before him; his maiden sister, who had been betrothed to one of the Curiatii, met him before the Capena Gate; and having recognized on her brother’s shoulders her betrothed’s cloak, which she herself had made, she loosened her hair and tearfully called her dead betrothed by name.

§1.26.3

​movet feroci iuveni animum conploratio sororis in victoria sua tantoque gaudio publico. stricto itaque gladio simul verbis increpans transfigit puellam.

​In the midst of his victory and such great public joy, the sister’s lamentation moved the mind of the fierce youth. And so, with drawn sword, at the same time rebuking her with words, he ran the girl through.

§1.26.4

“abi hinc cum inmaturo amore ad sponsum” inquit, “oblita fratrum mortuorum vivique, oblita patriae.

”Go hence with your untimely love to your betrothed,” he said, “forgetful of your dead brothers and the living one, forgetful of your country.

§1.26.5

​sic eat, quaecumque Romana lugebit hostem.” atrox visum id facinus patribus plebique, sed recens meritum facto obstabat. tamen raptus in ius ad regem. rex, ne ipse tamen tristis ingratique ad vulgus iudicii ac secundum iudicium supplicii auctor2 esset, concilio populi advocato “duumviros” inquit, “qui Horatio perduellionem iudicent, secundum legem facio.”

​Thus may every Roman woman go who shall mourn an enemy.” This deed seemed atrocious to the fathers and the plebeians, but his recent service stood in the way of the deed. Nevertheless, he was dragged to court before the king. The king, lest he himself should be the author of a judgment grim and unpopular with the common people, and of the punishment following the judgment, having summoned an assembly of the people, said: “I appoint, according to the law, duumvirs to judge Horatius for high treason.”

§1.26.6

​lex horrendi carminis erat: duumviri perduellionem iudicent; si a duumviris provocarit, provocatione certato; si vincent, caput obnubito; infelici arbori reste suspendito; verberato vel intra pomerium vel extra pomerium.

​The law of the dreadful formula was: “Let the duumvirs judge treason; if he appeals from the duumvirs, let him contend by appeal; if they win, let [the lictor] cover his head; hang him with a rope from a barren tree; scourge him either within the pomerium or outside the pomerium.”

§1.26.7

​hac lege duumviri creati. qui se absolvere non rebantur ea lege ne innoxium quidem posse, cum condemnassent, tum alter ex iis “P. Horati, tibi perduellionem iudico” inquit;

​Under this law, the duumvirs were created. Since they did not think that they could acquit even an innocent person under that law, when they had condemned him, then one of them said: “Publius Horatius, I judge you guilty of treason.

§1.26.8

“i, lictor, conliga manus.” accesserat lictor iniciebatque laqueum. tum Horatius auctore Tullo, clemente legis interprete, “provoco” inquit.

​Go, lictor, bind his hands.” The lictor had approached and was throwing the noose. Then Horatius, on the advice of Tullus, a merciful interpreter of the law, said: “I appeal.”

§1.26.9

​ita provocatione certatum ad populum est. moti homines sunt in eo iudicio maxime P. Horatio patre proclamante se filiam iure caesam iudicare; ni ita esset, patrio iure in filium animadversurum fuisse.3 orabat deinde, ne se, quem paulo ante cum egregia stirpe conspexissent, orbum liberis facerent.

​Thus the contest was carried by appeal to the people. In that trial, many were moved especially by the father, Publius Horatius, crying out that he judged his daughter to have been lawfully slain; [and that] if it were not so, he would have punished his son by his fatherly right. He then begged that they would not make him bereft of children, whom they had seen a little before with an excellent offspring.

§1.26.10

​inter haec senex iuvenem amplexus, spolia Curiatiorum fixa eo loco, qui nunc pila Horatia appellatur, ostentans “huncine” aiebat, “quem modo decoratum ovantemque victoria incedentem vidistis, Quirites, eum sub furca vinctum inter verbera et cruciatus videre potestis? quod vix Albanorum oculi tam deforme spectaculum ferre possent.

​Meanwhile the old man, having embraced the youth, pointing to the spoils of the Curiatii fixed in that place which is now called the Horatian Pillars, was saying: “Can you, Quirites, behold this man bound under the fork amid scourging and tortures, whom you saw just now marching adorned and triumphing in victory? A sight so hideous that even the eyes of the Albans could scarcely bear it.

§1.26.11

​i, lictor, conliga manus, quae paulo ante armatae imperium populo Romano pepererunt. i, caput obnube liberatoris urbis huius; arbore infelici suspende; verbera vel intra pomerium, modo inter4 illa pila et spolia hostium, vel extra pomerium, modo inter sepulcra Curiatiorum. quo enim ducere hunc iuvenem potestis, ubi non sua decora eum a tanta foeditate supplicii vindicent?”

​Go, lictor, bind the hands which, armed a little while ago, won dominion for the Roman people. Go, cover the head of the savior of this city; hang him from the barren tree; scourge him either within the pomerium, provided it be among those pillars and spoils of the enemy, or outside the pomerium, provided it be among the tombs of the Curiatii! For whither can you lead this young man, where his own honors would not rescue him from such hideousness of punishment?”

§1.26.12

​non tulit populus nec patris lacrimas nec ipsius parem in omni periculo animum, absolveruntque admiratione magis virtutis quam iure causae. itaque, ut caedes manifesta aliquo tamen piaculo lueretur, imperatum patri, ut filium expiaret pecunia publica.

​The people could bear neither the father’s tears nor the youth’s own spirit, equal in every danger, and they acquitted him, more out of admiration for his courage than because of the justice of his cause. And so, in order that the manifest murder might nevertheless be expiated by some atonement, it was commanded to the father that he should expiate his son at public expense.

§1.26.13

​is quibusdam piacularibus sacrificiis factis, quae deinde genti Horatiae tradita sunt, transmisso per viam tigillo capite adoperto velut sub iugum misit iuvenem. id hodie quoque publice semper refectum manet; sororium tigillum vocant.

​He, having performed certain expiatory sacrifices, which were thereafter handed down to the Horatian gens, a beam having been laid across the street, sent the youth with covered head under it as if under a yoke. This remains today also, always rebuilt at public expense; they call it the “Sister’s Beam”.

§1.26.14

​Horatiae sepulcrum, quo loco corruerat icta, constructum est saxo quadrato.

​The tomb of Horatia was built of squared stone in the place where she had fallen, struck down.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 1.26.1usurum se eorum opera

    An accusative with infinitive construction in indirect speech (oratio obliqua), depending on the verb imperat (which implies speaking/declaring). The subject accusative is se (Tullus), and opera is an ablative acting as the object of the future active participle usurum [esse]; eorum refers to the Alban youth.

  2. 1.26.5tristis ingratique ad vulgus iudicii ac secundum iudicium supplicii auctor

    A complex structure with two genitive phrases (tristis ingratique... iudicii and secundum iudicium supplicii) depending on the noun auctor (author/initiator). In the first phrase, the adjective ingratique is modified by the prepositional phrase ad vulgus (unpopular with the common people).

  3. 1.26.9animadversurum fuisse

    The apodosis of a contrary-to-fact conditional sentence in indirect discourse. The direct statement would have been in the pluperfect subjunctive (animadvertissem "I would have punished"). In indirect speech, a past contrary-to-fact active apodosis is expressed by the future active participle with fuisse.

  4. 1.26.11modo inter

    The use of modo as a restrictive/conditional particle meaning "provided that" or "only let it be". It introduces a conditional restriction on where the scourging may occur, modifying both intra pomerium and extra pomerium.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:1.26.1-1.26.14