- Source
- Sallust. C. Sallusti Crispi Catilina, Iugurtha, orationes et epistulae excerptae de historiis. Ahlberg, Axel Wilhelm, editor. Leipzig: Teubner, 1919.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:latinLit:phi0631.phi001.humanitext-lat3:53-56
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-27
Following Cato's speech, the senate decrees the death penalty. The author compares the character and virtue of the two outstanding men of Rome, Cato and Caesar, and then describes the execution of the arrested conspirators and Catiline's organization of his army and rejection of slaves.
Postquam Cato adsedit, consulares omnes itemque senatus magna pars sententiam eius laudant, virtutem animi ad caelum ferunt, alii alios increpantes timidos vocant. Cato clarus atque magnus habetur; senati decretum fit, sicuti ille censuerat. Sed mihi multa legenti, multa audienti, quae populus Romanus domi militiaeque, mari atque terra praeclara facinora fecit, forte lubuit attendere, quae res maxume tanta negotia sustinuisset.1 sciebam saepenumero parva manu cum magnis legionibus hostium contendisse; cognoveram parvis copiis bella gesta cum opulentis regibus, ad hoc saepe fortunae violentiam toleravisse, facundia Graecos, gloria belli Gallos ante Romanos fuisse. ac mihi multa agitanti constabat paucorum civium egregiam virtutem cuncta patravisse, eoque factum, uti divitias paupertas, multitudinem paucitas superaret. sed postquam luxu atque desidia civitas corrupta est, rursus res publica magnitudine sua imperatorum atque magistratuum vitia sustentabat ac, sicuti effeta parentum ui,2 multis tempestatibus haud sane quisquam Romae virtute magnus fuit. sed memoria mea ingenti virtute, divorsis moribus fuere viri duo, M. Cato et C. Caesar. quos quoniam res obtulerat, silentio praeterire non fuit consilium, quin utriusque naturam et mores, quantum ingenio possum, aperirem. igitur iis genus aetas eloquentia prope aequalia fuere, magnitudo animi par, item gloria, sed alia alii.3 Caesar beneficiis ac munificentia magnus habebatur, integritate vitae Cato. ille mansuetudine et misericordia clarus factus, huic severitas dignitatem addiderat. Caesar dando sublevando ignoscundo, Cato nihil largiundo gloriam adeptus est. in altero miseris perfugium erat, in altero malis pernicies. illius facilitas, huius constantia laudabatur. postremo Caesar in animum induxerat laborare, vigilare; negotiis amicorum intentus sua neglegere, nihil denegare quod dono dignum esset; sibi magnum imperium, exercitum, bellum novom exoptabat, ubi virtus enitescere posset. at Catoni studium modestiae, decoris, sed maxume severitatis erat; non divitiis cum divite neque factione cum factioso, sed cum strenuo virtute, cum modesto pudore, cum innocente abstinentia certabat; esse quam videri bonus malebat:4 ita, quo minus petebat gloriam, eo magis illum sequebatur.
After Cato sat down, all the consulars and likewise a great part of the senate praised his opinion, raised his mental virtue to the skies, and, reproaching one another, called them cowards. Cato was held to be illustrious and great; a decree of the senate was made, just as he had proposed. But to me, reading much and hearing much of the illustrious deeds which the Roman people performed at home and in the field, on sea and land, it happened by chance to please me to attend to what cause had especially sustained such great undertakings. I knew that they had often contended with a small band against great legions of enemies; I had learned that wars had been waged with small forces against wealthy kings, besides that they had often tolerated the violence of fortune, and that the Greeks were ahead of the Romans in eloquence, and the Gauls in the glory of war. And to me, reflecting on many things, it was clear that the extraordinary virtue of a few citizens had accomplished everything, and that it was due to this that poverty overcame wealth, and a few overcame a multitude. But after the state was corrupted by luxury and sloth, the republic, in turn, by its own greatness, sustained the vices of its commanders and magistrates, and, as if the strength of the parents were exhausted, for many ages there was hardly anyone at Rome great in virtue. But in my memory there were two men of huge virtue, though of diverse characters: Marcus Cato and Gaius Caesar. Since fortune had presented them, it was not my plan to pass them over in silence without opening the nature and manners of both as far as I am able with my talent. Therefore, their birth, age, and eloquence were almost equal, their greatness of mind was on a par, likewise their glory, but it was of a different kind for each. Caesar was held to be great by his benefits and munificence, Cato by the integrity of his life. The former became illustrious for his clemency and compassion; to the latter, severity had added dignity. Caesar acquired glory by giving, relieving, and forgiving; Cato by bestowing nothing. In the one, there was a refuge for the wretched; in the other, destruction for the wicked. The easy nature of the former and the constancy of the latter were praised. Finally, Caesar had resolved in his mind to labor, to watch; intent on the business of his friends, to neglect his own, and to deny nothing that was worthy of a gift; for himself, he desired a great command, an army, and a new war where his virtue could shine forth. But Cato had a zeal for moderation, decency, but most of all, for severity; he did not contend in wealth with the wealthy, nor in faction with the factious, but in virtue with the active, in modesty with the moderate, and in abstinence with the innocent; he preferred to be good rather than to seem so: thus, the less he sought glory, the more it followed him.
+ extra markers: 54 (translation introduced markers absent in the source; merged into this section)
Postquam, ut dixi, senatus in Catonis sententiam discessit, consul optumum factu ratus5 noctem quae instabat antecapere, ne quid eo spatio novaretur, tresviros quae ad supplicium postulabantur parare iubet. ipse praesidiis dispositis Lentulum in carcerem deducit; idem fit ceteris per praetores. est in carcere locus, quod Tullianum appellatur, ubi paululum ascenderis ad laevam, circiter duodecim pedes humi depressus; eum muniunt undique parietes atque insuper camera lapideis fornicibus iuncta; sed incultu tenebris odore foeda atque terribilis eius facies est. in eum locum postquam demissus est Lentulus, vindices rerum capitalium, quibus praeceptum erat, laqueo gulam fregere. ita ille patricius ex gente clarissuma Corneliorum, qui consulare imperium Romae habuerat, dignum moribus factisque suis exitium vitae invenit. de Cethego, Statilio, Gabinio, Caepario eodem modo supplicium sumptum est.
After the senate, as I said, divided in favor of Cato’s opinion, the consul, thinking it best to anticipate the night which was pressing on, lest anything should be innovated in that interval, ordered the triumvirs to prepare what was required for the execution. He himself, having posted guards, led Lentulus into the prison; the same was done for the others by the praetors. There is in the prison a place called the Tullianum, when you have ascended a little to the left, sunk about twelve feet into the ground; walls secure it on all sides, and above it, a vaulted roof joined with stone arches; but its appearance is foul and terrible from neglect, darkness, and stench. After Lentulus was let down into this place, the executioners of capital matters, who had been commanded, broke his neck with a noose. Thus that patrician from the most illustrious house of the Cornelii, who had held the consular command at Rome, found an end of his life worthy of his manners and deeds. Punishment was inflicted in the same manner on Cethegus, Statilius, Gabinius, and Caeparius.
Dum ea Romae geruntur, Catilina ex omni copia, quam et ipse adduxerat et Manlius habuerat, duas legiones instituit, cohortis pro numero militum conplet. deinde, ut quisque voluntarius aut ex sociis in castra venerat, aequaliter distribuerat, ac brevi spatio legiones numero hominum expleverat, quom initio non amplius duobus milibus habuisset. sed ex omni copia circiter pars quarta erat militaribus armis instructa; ceteri, ut quemque casus armaverat, sparos aut lanceas, alii praeacutas sudis portabant. sed postquam Antonius cum exercitu adventabat, Catilina per montis iter facere, modo ad urbem, modo Galliam vorsus castra movere, hostibus occasionem pugnandi non dare. sperabat propediem magnas copias sese habiturum, si Romae socii incepta patravissent. interea servitia repudiabat, quoius initio ad eum magnae copiae concurrebant, opibus coniurationis fretus, simul alienum suis rationibus existumans videri causam civium cum servis fugitivis communicavisse.6
While these things were being done at Rome, Catiline, from the whole force which he himself had brought and Manlius had held, formed two legions, and filled up the cohorts according to the number of soldiers. Then, as each volunteer or ally came into the camp, he distributed them equally, and in a short time had filled the legions with the number of men, although at the beginning he had not had more than two thousand. But of the whole force, about a fourth part was equipped with military weapons; the rest, as chance had armed each one, carried hunting-spears or lances, and others sharp-pointed stakes. But after Antonius was approaching with his army, Catiline made his march through the mountains, moved his camp now toward the city, now toward Gaul, and gave the enemy no opportunity of fighting. He hoped that he would soon have great forces, if his allies at Rome had accomplished their undertakings. Meanwhile, he rejected the slaves, of whom great numbers flocked to him at the beginning, relying on the resources of the conspiracy, and at the same time thinking it foreign to his interests to appear to have shared the cause of citizens with runaway slaves.
- 53.2forte lubuit attendere, quae res maxume tanta negotia sustinuisset
The infinitive attendere acts as the subject of the impersonal verb lubuit (libuit), and the indirect question clause quae res ... sustinuisset (with the subjunctive pluperfect) functions as the object of attendere.
- 53.5sicuti effeta parentum ui
A metaphorical expression meaning "as if the strength of the parents were exhausted." effeta is an adjective in the ablative, modifying the ablative noun ui (from uis, strength), while parentum is a genitive plural meaning "of the parents" or "of the ancestors."
- 53sed alia alii
A highly elliptical expression for sed alia gloria alii fuit ("but different glory belonged to the one and to the other"), meaning that each possessed a different kind of glory or character.
- 53esse quam videri bonus malebat
A contrast using subjective infinitives governed by malebat. esse (to be in reality) and videri (to seem/appear) are compared by quam ("rather than"). The complement bonus agrees in the nominative with the subject (Cato).
- 55.1consul optumum factu ratus
optumum is a neuter adjective accompanied by the ablative supine factu (from facio), meaning "the best thing to be done." ratus is the perfect participle of the deponent verb reor, here used with a present force ("thinking").
- 56.5alienum suis rationibus existumans videri causam civium cum servis fugitivis communicavisse
An accusative with infinitive construction acting as the object of existumans. The passive infinitive videri (to appear) acts as the subject of the construction, which in turn takes the perfect active infinitive communicavisse (to have shared) as its logical subject. alienum suis rationibus is a predicative adjective phrase modifying this entire infinitive clause, meaning "inconsistent with (or foreign to) his interests."
