← Pausanias

Description of Greece

§4.29.7-4.29.13

Conflicts with the Achaeans and End of the History

The narrative relates the relations between the Messenians and the Achaean League, the rescue of Megalopolitans, the conflict with the Spartan tyrant Nabis, the capture of Philopoemen, and Messene's re-entry into the league, concluding the history of Messenian sufferings and transitioning to the geographical description.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§4.29.7

ὃ δὲ οὐ λέληθεν ἐμέ,1 οὐδὲ Μεσσηνίους ἐλελήθει δήπου, καὶ μὴ συντελοῦσιν αὐτοῖς ἐς τὸ συνέδριον ὡς ἐπὶ Λακεδαιμονίους τὰ Ἀχαιῶν ὑπάρχοι· ἐν γὰρ δὴ τοῖς Ἀχαιοῖς καὶ Ἀργεῖοι καὶ τὸ Ἀρκαδικὸν οὐκ ἐλαχίστη μοῖρα ἦσαν. ἀνὰ χρόνον μέντοι προσεχώρησαν ἐς τὸ Ἀχαϊκόν. οὐ πολλῷ δὲ ὕστερον Κλεομένης ὁ Λεωνίδου τοῦ Κλεωνύμου Μεγάλην πόλιν εἷλεν Ἀρκάδων ἐν σπονδαῖς·

​But what has not escaped me, and indeed had not escaped the Messenians either, was that even though they did not contribute to the congress, the resources of the Achaeans were available to them against the Lacedaemonians; for indeed among the Achaeans, both the Argives and the Arcadians constituted no small part. In course of time, however, they joined the Achaean League. Not long afterwards, Cleomenes, the son of Leonidas who was the son of Cleonymus, captured Megalopolis, a city of the Arcadians, during a truce.

§4.29.8

τῶν δὲ οἱ καταληφθέντες οἳ μὲν ἀπώλοντο ὑπὸ τὴν ἅλωσιν, Φιλοποίμενα δὲ τὸν Κραύγιδος καὶ ὅσοι μετὰ Φιλοποίμενος ἀπεχώρησαν—γενέσθαι δὲ τῶν Μεγαλοπολιτῶν τὸ διαφυγὸν καὶ ὑπὲρ τὰς δύο μοίρας2 λέγουσι—τούτους ὑπεδέξαντο οἱ Μεσσήνιοι τῶν τε ἀρχαίων ἔργων ἕνεκα ὁπόσα ἐπὶ Ἀριστομένους ὑπῆρκτο Ἀρκάσι καὶ ὕστερον ἐπὶ τοῦ οἰκισμοῦ τοῦ Μεσσήνης, ἀποδιδόντες σφίσι τὴν ὁμοίαν.3

​Of those captured, some perished at the taking of the city, but Philopoemen, the son of Craugis, and all who retreated with Philopoemen—and they say that the portion of the Megalopolitans who escaped was even more than two thirds—these the Messenians received, because of all the ancient services rendered to the Arcadians in the time of Aristomenes, and later at the founding of Messene, thus returning the like to them.

§4.29.9

πέφυκε δὲ ἄρα ὡς ἐπίπαν μεταπίπτειν τὰ ἀνθρώπινα, εἰ δὴ4 Μεσσηνίοις Ἀρκάδας τε ἀντισῶσαι καὶ τὸ ἀδοκητότερον ἔτι ἑλεῖν Σπάρτην ὁ δαίμων ἔδωκεν· Κλεομένει γὰρ περὶ Σελλασίαν ἐμαχέσαντο ἐναντία καὶ τὴν Σπάρτην Ἀράτῳ καὶ Ἀχαιοῖς συγκαθεῖλον.

​It is indeed the nature of human affairs to change completely on the whole, seeing that the deity granted to the Messenians both to save the Arcadians in turn and, what was still more unexpected, to capture Sparta; for they fought against Cleomenes near Sellasia and helped Aratus and the Achaeans to overthrow Sparta.

§4.29.10

Λακεδαιμονίοις δὲ ἀπηλλαγμένοις Κλεομένους ἐπανίσταται τύραννος Μαχανίδας, ἐκείνου δὲ ἀποθανόντος Νάβις ἀνέφυ σφίσιν αὖθις τύραννος· ἅτε δὲ οὐ τὰ ἀνθρώπων ἀναρπάζοντι αὐτῷ μόνον, ἀλλὰ καὶ ἱερὰ συλῶντι, ἐν οὐ πολλῷ χρόνῳ χρήματά τε ἄφθονα καὶ ἀπʼ αὐτῶν στρατιὰ συνείλεκτο. τούτου τοῦ Νάβιδος Μεσσήνην καταλαβόντος Φιλοποίμην καὶ οἱ Μεγαλοπολῖται νυκτὸς ἀφίκοντο τῆς αὐτῆς·

​When the Lacedaemonians were rid of Cleomenes, the tyrant Machanidas rose against them, and after his death, Nabis arose as tyrant over them in turn. Since he did not only plunder the possessions of men but also despoiled temples, in a short time abundant wealth and, by means of it, an army was collected. When this Nabis seized Messene, Philopoemen and the Megalopolitans arrived on the same night.

§4.29.11

καὶ ὁ μὲν Σπαρτιάτης τύραννος ἀπῆλθεν ὑπόσπονδος, Ἀχαιοὶ δὲ ὕστερον τούτων μεμφόμενοί τι Μεσσηνίοις στρατεύουσιν ἐπʼ αὐτοὺς παρασκευῇ τῇ πάσῃ καὶ τὰ πολλὰ ἔτεμον τῆς χώρας. καὶ οἳ μὲν αὖθις περὶ ἀκμὴν σίτου συνελέγοντο ὡς ἐς τὴν Μεσσηνίαν ἐσβαλοῦντες· Δεινοκράτης δὲ δήμου τε προεστηκὼς καὶ Μεσσηνίων ἄρχειν ἐν τῷ τότε ᾑρημένος Λυκόρταν μὲν καὶ τὴν σὺν αὐτῷ στρατιὰν ἀναχωρῆσαι παρεσκεύασεν ἄπρακτον, τὰς ἐς τὴν Μεσσηνίαν ἐκ τῆς Ἀρκαδίας παρόδους προλαβὼν τοῖς τε ἐκ τῆς πόλεως Μεσσηνίοις καὶ ὅσοι τῶν περιοίκων σφίσιν ἤμυναν·

​And the Spartan tyrant departed under a treaty, but the Achaeans, after these events, finding some fault with the Messenians, marched against them with all their forces and ravaged most of their territory. And they again assembled about the time when the corn was ripe, intending to invade Messenia; but Deinocrates, who was at the head of the people and had been chosen to rule the Messenians at that time, caused Lycortas and the army with him to retreat without accomplishing anything, having preoccupied the passes from Arcadia into Messenia with the Messenians from the city and all of the periokoi who helped them.

§4.29.12

Φιλοποίμενος δὲ σὺν ἱππεῦσιν ὀλίγοις ἀφικομένου πολὺ ὕστερον ἢ ὁ μετὰ Λυκόρτα στρατός, πυθέσθαι δὲ οὐδέν πω τῶν ἐς αὐτοὺς δεδυνημένου, νικῶσιν οἱ Μεσσήνιοι γινομένης σφίσιν ἐξ ὑπερδεξίων τῆς μάχης καὶ ζῶντα αἱροῦσι Φιλοποίμενα. τρόπον δὲ ὅντινα ὁ Φιλοποίμην ἑάλω καὶ ὡς ἐτελεύτησε, τάδε μὲν ἡμῖν καὶ ὕστερον ὁ Ἀρκαδικὸς λόγος ἐπέξεισι· Μεσσηνίων δὲ οἵ τε Φιλοποίμενι αἴτιοι τῆς τελευτῆς ἔδοσαν δίκας καὶ ἡ Μεσσήνη συνετέλεσεν αὖθις ἐς τὸ Ἀχαϊκόν.

​But when Philopoemen arrived with a few horsemen, much later than the army under Lycortas, and was not yet able to learn anything of their situation, the Messenians won the battle, which took place from higher ground in their favor, and captured Philopoemen alive. In what manner Philopoemen was captured and how he died, my Arcadian history will relate in detail later; but those of the Messenians who were responsible for the death of Philopoemen paid the penalty, and Messene again contributed to the Achaean League.

§4.29.13

ἄχρι μὲν δὴ τοῦδε ὁ λόγος ἐπῆλθέ μοι Μεσσηνίων τὰ πολλὰ παθήματα, καὶ ὡς ὁ δαίμων σφᾶς ἐπί τε γῆς τὰ ἔσχατα καὶ ἐπὶ τὰ πορρώτατα Πελοποννήσου σκεδάσας ὕστερον χρόνῳ καὶ ἐς τὴν οἰκείαν ἀνέσωσε· τὸ δὲ ἀπὸ τούτου τῆς χώρας καὶ πόλεων τραπώμεθα ἐς ἀφήγησιν.

​Up to this point, then, my narrative has gone over the many sufferings of the Messenians, and how the deity, having scattered them to the furthest ends of the earth and to the most distant parts from the Peloponnese, later in time saved them and restored them to their own land; but after this, let us turn to the description of the country and its cities.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 4.29.7ὃ δὲ οὐ λέληθεν ἐμέ

    The relative pronoun ὅ is a proleptic pronoun pointing to the content of the following clause: καὶ μὴ συντελοῦσιν... τὰ Ἀχαιῶν ὑπάρχοι (that the resources of the Achaeans were available to them even though they did not contribute to the congress). The dative participle μὴ συντελοῦσιν αὐτοῖς is concessive.

  2. 4.29.8τῶν Μεγαλοπολιτῶν τὸ διαφυγὸν καὶ ὑπὲρ τὰς δύο μοίρας

    tò διαφυγόν ("the portion that escaped") is a neuter singular participle used substantively to represent the whole body of Megalopolitan escapees. τὰς δύο μοίρας ("the two parts") is a Greek idiomatic expression meaning "two thirds" (two out of three parts).

  3. 4.29.8ἀποδιδόντες σφίσι τὴν ὁμοίαν

    τὴν ὁμοίαν is an idiomatic expression with the ellipsis of a feminine noun such as χάριν (favor) or ἀμοιβήν (return), meaning "returning the like" or "paying back in the same coin."

  4. 4.29.9εἰ δὴ

    Although composed of the conditional particle εἰ and the particle δή, here it does not express a mere hypothesis but introduces a factual reason, meaning "since indeed" or "inasmuch as."

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0525.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:4.29.7-4.29.13