← Pausanias

Description of Greece

§4.28.1-4.28.8

Foreign Relations and Messenian Capture of Elis

The foreign relations of the Messenians after their return are described, along with their capture of Elis using a stratagem with Laconian shields, which is compared to the useful military devices invented by Homer.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§4.28.1

κατελθοῦσι δὲ αὐτοῖς κατʼ ἀρχὰς μὲν ἀπὸ Λακεδαιμονίων δεινὸν ἦν οὐδέν· κατεχόμενοι γὰρ οἱ Λακεδαιμόνιοι φόβῳ τῷ Θηβαίων Μεσσήνης τε ἠνείχοντο ἐποικιζομένης1 καὶ Ἀρκάδων ἐς μίαν ἠθροισμένων πόλιν. ὡς δὲ ὁ πόλεμος ὁ Φωκικός, καλούμενος δὲ ὁ αὐτὸς οὗτος καὶ ἱερός, ἀπήγαγεν ἐκ Πελοποννήσου Θηβαίους, ἀνεθάρρησάν τε οἱ Λακεδαιμόνιοι καὶ τῶν Μεσσηνίων οὐκέτι ἐδύναντο ἀπέχεσθαι.

​When they returned, at first there was nothing to fear from the Lacedaemonians; for the Lacedaemonians, held by fear of the Thebans, tolerated both the resettlement of Messene and the gathering of the Arcadians into one city. But when the Phocian war, also called the Sacred War, withdrew the Thebans from the Peloponnese, the Lacedaemonians took heart again and could no longer keep their hands off the Messenians.

§4.28.2

Μεσσήνιοι δὲ αὐτοί τε μετὰ Ἀργείων καὶ Ἀρκάδων ἀντεῖχον τῷ πολέμῳ καὶ Ἀθηναίων ἀμῦναί σφισιν ἐδεήθησαν· οἱ δὲ ἐς μὲν τὴν Λακωνικὴν οὔποτε μετὰ ἐκείνων ἐσβαλεῖν ἔφασαν, ἀρχόντων δὲ Λακεδαιμονίων πολέμου καὶ ἐπιστρατευόντων τῇ Μεσσηνίᾳ παρέσεσθαι καὶ αὐτοί σφισιν ἐπηγγέλλοντο. τέλος δὲ οἱ Μεσσήνιοι Φιλίππῳ σύμμαχοι τῷ Ἀμύντου καὶ Μακεδόσιν ἐγένοντο, καὶ τοῦτο σφᾶς λέγουσιν ἀποκωλῦσαι τοῦ συμβάντος τοῖς Ἕλλησιν ἀγῶνος ἐν Χαιρωνείᾳ μὴ μετασχεῖν·2 οὐ μὴν οὐδὲ τοῖς Ἕλλησιν ἐναντία θέσθαι τὰ ὅπλα ἠθέλησαν.

​The Messenians themselves, together with the Argives and Arcadians, held out in the war and begged the Athenians to help them; the Athenians said they would never invade Laconia with them, but promised that they themselves would also be present to help if the Lacedaemonians began war and marched against Messenia. Finally, the Messenians became allies of Philip, the son of Amyntas, and the Macedonians, and they say that this prevented them from taking part in the struggle that befell the Greeks at Chaeronea; yet they did not wish to take up arms against the Greeks either.

§4.28.3

Ἀλεξάνδρου δὲ ἀποθανόντος καὶ τῶν Ἑλλήνων πόλεμον δεύτερον τότε ἀνῃρημένων πρὸς Μακεδόνας, μετέσχον καὶ οἱ Μεσσήνιοι τοῦ πολέμου, καθὰ καὶ πρότερον ἐδήλωσα ἐν τῇ Ἀτθίδι συγγραφῇ. Γαλάταις δὲ μεθʼ Ἑλλήνων οὐκ ἐμαχέσαντο, Κλεωνύμου καὶ Λακεδαιμονίων σπείσασθαι σπονδάς σφισιν οὐ θελησάντων.

​But when Alexander died and the Greeks then undertook their second war against the Macedonians, the Messenians also took part in the war, just as I showed before in my Attic history. But they did not fight against the Galatians together with the Greeks, since Cleonymus and the Lacedaemonians were unwilling to make a treaty with them.

§4.28.4

οὐ πολλῷ δὲ ὕστερον ἔσχον Ἦλιν Μεσσήνιοι, σοφίᾳ τε ὁμοῦ χρησάμενοι καὶ τολμήματι. Ἠλεῖοι γὰρ τὰ μὲν παλαιότατα εὐνομώτατοι Πελοποννησίων ἦσαν· Φιλίππου δὲ τοῦ Ἀμύντου τά τε ἄλλα ὁπόσα εἴρηται κακουργήσαντος τὴν Ἑλλάδα καὶ Ἠλείων τοὺς δυνατοὺς διαφθείραντος χρήμασι, στασιάζουσι πρῶτον τότε Ἠλεῖοι καὶ ἐς ὅπλα, ὡς λέγουσι, χωροῦσι.

​Not long after, the Messenians held Elis, employing both skill and daring together. For in the most ancient times, the Eleans were the best governed of the Peloponnesians; but when Philip, the son of Amyntas, did mischief to Greece in all the other ways that have been mentioned, and corrupted the powerful men of the Eleans with money, the Eleans then for the first time fell into faction and, as they say, resorted to arms.

§4.28.5

τὸ δὲ ἀπὸ τούτου ῥᾷον ἔτι ἔμελλον ἀπεχθήσεσθαι πρὸς ἀλλήλους, οἷς γε καὶ Λακεδαιμονίων ἕνεκα διέστη τὰ βουλεύματα, καὶ ἐς ἔμφυλον προῆλθον πόλεμον. πυνθανόμενοι δὲ ταῦτα οἱ Λακεδαιμόνιοι παρεσκευάζοντο ὡς Ἠλείων τοῖς φρονοῦσι τὰ σφέτερα ἀμυνοῦντες. καὶ οἱ μὲν κατὰ τέλη τε ἐτάσσοντο καὶ διενέμοντο ἐς τοὺς λόχους· τῶν δὲ Μεσσηνίων λογάδες χίλιοι φθάνουσιν ἀφικόμενοι3 πρὸς τὴν Ἦλιν, σημεῖα ἐπὶ ταῖς ἀσπίσι Λακωνικὰ ἔχοντες.

​After this, they were destined to become still more easily hostile to one another, since indeed their counsels were divided also on account of the Lacedaemonians, and they went on to a civil war. Learning of these things, the Lacedaemonians prepared to assist those of the Eleans who favored their cause. And while they were being drawn up by divisions and distributed into companies, a thousand chosen men of the Messenians arrived at Elis beforehand, having Laconian devices on their shields.

§4.28.6

ὡς δὲ τὰς ἀσπίδας ἐθεάσαντο ὅσοι τοῖς Σπαρτιάταις εὖνοι τῶν Ἠλείων ἦσαν, συμμαχίαν τε ἀφῖχθαί σφισιν ἤλπισαν καὶ τοὺς ἄνδρας ἐδέχοντο ἐς τὸ τεῖχος· ἐσελθόντες δὲ τρόπον οἱ Μεσσήνιοι τὸν εἰρημένον τοὺς τὰ Λακεδαιμονίων φρονοῦντας ἐδίωξαν, καὶ ἐπιτρέπουσι τοῖς στασιώταις τοῖς αὑτῶν τὴν πόλιν.

​When those of the Eleans who were well-disposed to the Spartans saw the shields, they hoped that an allied force had arrived for them and received the men inside the wall; but the Messenians, having entered in the manner described, drove out those who favored the Lacedaemonians, and turned the city over to their own faction.

§4.28.7

ἔστι μὲν δὴ τὸ σόφισμα Ὁμήρου, φαίνονται δὲ αὐτὸ ἐν δέοντι μιμησάμενοι4 καὶ οἱ Μεσσήνιοι, ἐπεὶ Πάτροκλόν γε ἐποίησεν ἐν Ἰλιάδι Ὅμηρος Ἀχιλλέως τὰ ὅπλα ἐνδύντα, καὶ ἐγγενέσθαι τε ἔφη τοῖς βαρβάροις δόξαν ὡς Ἀχιλλεὺς ἐπίοι καὶ τοὺς προτεταγμένους αὐτῶν ταραχθῆναι. εὕρηται δὲ καὶ ἄλλα Ὁμήρῳ στρατηγήματα, δύο τε παρὰ τῶν Ἑλλήνων κατασκόπους ἐν τῇ νυκτὶ ἀνθʼ ἑνὸς ἐς τοὺς Τρῶας ἀφικέσθαι καὶ ἄνδρα ὕστερον λόγῳ μὲν αὐτόμολον, ἔργῳ δὲ τὰ ἀπόρρητα πολυπραγμονήσοντα ἐς τὸ Ἴλιον ἐσελθεῖν.

​Indeed, this device belongs to Homer, and the Messenians appear to have imitated it at the proper time, since Homer in the Iliad made Patroclus put on the armor of Achilles, and said that an impression was created among the barbarians that Achilles was advancing, and that their front ranks were thrown into confusion. Other stratagems also have been devised by Homer: that two spies from the Greeks, instead of one, went in the night to the Trojans, and that later a man, in word a deserter but in deed to busy himself with their secrets, entered Ilium.

§4.28.8

ἔτι δὲ τοὺς διὰ νεότητα ἐν τοῖς Τρωσὶν ἢ γῆρας οὐχ ὡραίους μάχεσθαι, τούτους μὲν τὸ τεῖχος φρουρεῖν ἔταξε, τῶν ἐν ἡλικίᾳ τοῖς Ἕλλησιν ἐπηυλισμένων· Ἑλλήνων δὲ οἱ τὰ τραύματα ἔχοντες ὁπλίζουσιν αὐτῷ5 τὸ μάχιμον, ἵνα μηδὲ αὐτοὶ παντάπασιν ἀργοῖεν. τὰ Ὁμήρου μὲν οὖν ὠφέλιμα ἐγένετο ἐς ἅπαντα ἀνθρώποις·

​Moreover, those among the Trojans who because of youth or old age were not of the right age to fight, these he ordered to guard the wall, while those of age were encamped against the Greeks; and of the Greeks, those who had wounds armed the fighting force in his description, so that they themselves should not be altogether idle. Thus, the works of Homer became useful to men for all things.

Syntax notes5 items
  1. 4.28.1Μεσσήνης τε ἠνείχοντο ἐποικιζομένης

    The verb ἀνέχομαι (to tolerate, endure) takes a genitive noun and a genitive participle showing the action tolerated. Here, Μεσσήνης (noun) and ἐποικιζομένης (participle) form this construction.

  2. 4.28.2ἀποκωλῦσαι τοῦ ... μὴ μετασχεῖν

    A double-negative construction where a verb of preventing or hindering (here ἀποκωλύω) is followed by an infinitive with the negative μὴ (the articular genitive τοῦ μὴ μετασχεῖν). It expresses a positive meaning: "prevented them from taking part."

  3. 4.28.5φθάνουσιν ἀφικόμενοι

    The verb φθάνω with a supplementary participle (here ἀφικόμενοι) is an idiomatic construction meaning "to do something before others" or "to arrive beforehand."

  4. 4.28.7φαίνονται δὲ ... μιμησάμενοι

    When the verb φαίνομαι is used with a participle instead of an infinitive, it indicates a clear fact: "they clearly imitated" or "they are shown to have imitated." This contrast with the infinitive construction, which means "to seem to do (but perhaps not actually doing)."

  5. 4.28.8αὐτῷ

    The dative form of the pronoun αὐτός, referring back to Homer (Ὅμηρος) mentioned in the preceding context. It functions as a dative of reference or locative meaning "in his description" or "in his poetry."

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0525.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:4.28.1-4.28.8