← Strabo

Geography

§3.5.7

The Spring with Reverse Tides at Gadeira

The text discusses the legend and physical causes of a mysterious spring (or wells) in the Heracleium of Gadeira, which supposedly fluctuates contrariwise to the tides, drawing on the theories of Polybius, Poseidonius, and Athenodorus.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§3.5.7

φησὶ δὲ ὁ Πολύβιος κρήνην ἐν τῷ Ἡρακλείῳ τῷ ἐν Γαδείροις εἶναι πότιμον, βαθμῶν ὀλίγων κατάβασιν ἔχουσαν εἰς τὸ ὕδωρ, ἣν ταῖς παλιρροίαις τῆς θαλάττης ἀντιπαθεῖν, κατὰ μὲν τὰς πλήμας ἐκλείπουσαν κατὰ δὲ τὰς ἀμπώτεις πληρουμένην. αἰτιᾶται δʼ ὅτι τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἐκ τοῦ βάθους εἰς τὴν ἐπιφάνειαν τῆς γῆς ἐκπῖπτον, καλυφθείσης μὲν αὐτῆς ὑπὸ τοῦ κύματος1 κατὰ τὰς ἐπιβάσεις τῆς θαλάττης, εἴργεται τῶν οἰκείων τοιούτων ἐξόδων· ἀναστρέψαν δὲ εἰς τὸ ἐντὸς ἐμφράττει τοὺς τῆς πηγῆς πόρους καὶ ποιεῖ λειψυδρίαν· γυμνωθείσης δὲ πάλιν, εὐθυπορῆσαν ἐλευθεροῖ τὰς φλέβας τῆς πηγῆς ὥστʼ ἀναβλύειν εὐπόρως. Ἀρτεμίδωρος δὲ ἀντειπὼν τούτῳ καὶ ἅμα παρʼ αὑτοῦ τινα θεὶς αἰτίαν, μνησθεὶς δὲ καὶ τῆς Σιλανοῦ δόξης τοῦ συγγραφέως, οὔ μοι δοκεῖ μνήμης ἄξια εἰπεῖν, ὡς ἂν ἰδιώτης περὶ ταῦτα καὶ αὐτὸς καὶ Σιλανός. Ποσειδώνιος δὲ ψευδῆ λέγων τὴν ἱστορίαν εἶναι ταύτην δύο φησὶν εἶναι φρέατα ἐν τῷ Ἡρακλείῳ καὶ τρίτον ἐν τῇ πόλει· τῶν δʼ ἐν τῷ Ἡρακλείῳ τὸ μὲν μικρότερον ὑδρευομένων συνεχῶς αὐθωρὸν2 καὶ ἐκλείπειν καὶ διαλειπόντων τῆς ὑδρείας πληροῦσθαι πάλιν, τὸ δὲ μεῖζον διʼ ὅλης τῆς ἡμέρας τὴν ὑδρείαν ἔχον, μειούμενον μέντοι, καθάπερ καὶ τἆλλα φρέατα πάντα, νύκτωρ πληροῦσθαι μηκέτι ὑδρευομένων· ἐπειδὴ δὲ συμπίπτει κατὰ τὸν τῆς συμπληρώσεως καιρὸν ἡ ἄμπωτις πολλάκις, πεπιστεῦσθαι κενῶς ὑπὸ τῶν ἐγχωρίων τὴν ἀντιπάθειαν. ὅτι μὲν οὖν ἡ ἱστορία πεπίστευται, καὶ οὗτος εἴρηκε καὶ ἡμεῖς ἐν τοῖς παραδόξοις θρυλουμένην παρειλήφαμεν. ἠκούομεν δὲ καὶ φρέατα εἶναι, τὰ μὲν πρὸ τῆς πόλεως ἐν τοῖς κήποις τὰ δὲ ἐντός, διὰ δὲ τὴν μοχθηρίαν τοῦ ὕδατος κατὰ τὴν πόλιν δεξαμενὰς ἐπιπολάζειν τοῦ λακκαίου ὕδατος· εἰ μέντοι καὶ τούτων τι τῶν φρεάτων ἐπιδείκνυται τὴν τῆς ἀντιπαθείας ὑπόνοιαν, οὐκ ἴσμεν. τὰς δʼ αἰτίας, εἴπερ συμβαίνει ταῦτα οὕτως, ὡς ἐν χαλεποῖς ἀποδέχεσθαι δεῖ. εἰκὸς μὲν γὰρ οὕτως ἔχειν ὡς ὁ Πολύβιός φησιν, εἰκὸς δὲ καὶ τῶν φλεβῶν τινας τῶν πηγαίων νοτισθείσας ἔξωθεν χαυνοῦσθαι καὶ παρέκχυσιν εἰς τὰ πλάγια μᾶλλον διδόναι τοῖς ὕδασιν ἢ ἀναθλίβειν κατὰ τὸ ἀρχαῖον ῥεῖθρον εἰς τὴν κρήνην· νοτίζεσθαι δʼ ἀναγκαῖον ἐπικλύσαντος τοῦ κύματος. εἰ δʼ, ὥσπερ Ἀθηνόδωρός φησιν, εἰσπνοῇ τε καὶ ἐκπνοῇ τὸ συμβαῖνον περὶ τὰς πλημμυρίδας καὶ περὶ τὰς ἀμπώτεις ἔοικεν, εἶναι ἄν τινα τῶν ῥεόντων ὑδάτων, ἃ κατʼ ἄλλους μὲν πόρους ἔχει τὴν ἔκρυσιν κατὰ φύσιν εἰς τὴν ἐπιφάνειαν, ὧν δὴ τὰ στόματα πηγὰς καὶ κρήνας καλοῦμεν, κατʼ ἄλλους δὲ πόρους συνέλκεται πρὸς τὸ τῆς θαλάττης βάθος· καὶ συνεξαίροντα μὲν ἐκείνην ὥστε πλημμυρεῖν, ὅταν οἷον ἡ ἐκπνοὴ γίνηται, τὸ οἰκεῖον ἀπολείπει ῥεῖθρον, πάλιν δʼ ἀναχωρεῖ3 πρὸς τὸ οἰκεῖον ῥεῖθρον, ὅταν κἀκείνη λάβῃ τὴν ἀναχώρησιν.

​Polybius says that there is a spring of potable water in the temple of Heracles in Gadeira, having a descent of a few steps down to the water, which reacts contrariwise to the tides of the sea, failing at high tide and filling up at ebb tide. And he attributes the cause to this: that the breath which escapes from the depths to the surface of the earth, when the surface is covered by the wave during the rises of the sea, is shut off from its proper exits of this kind; but turning back inwards, it blocks the passages of the spring and causes a lack of water; and when the surface is exposed again, proceeding in a straight course, it frees the veins of the spring so that it wells up abundantly. But Artemidorus, contradicting this and at the same time proposing a certain cause of his own, and also mentioning the opinion of Silanus the historian, does not seem to me to say things worthy of mention, since both he himself and Silanus are, as it were, laymen in these matters. Poseidonius, however, saying that this story is false, says that there are two wells in the Heracleium and a third in the city; and of those in the Heracleium, the smaller, when they draw water from it continuously, immediately fails and, when they cease drawing water, fills up again, while the larger, although providing water for drawing throughout the whole day, yet decreasing, just like all other wells, fills up at night when people no longer draw water; and since the time of filling up often coincides with the ebb tide, the antipathy has been vainly believed by the inhabitants. Now that this story has been believed, he too has said, and we ourselves have received it as a matter commonly talked about among marvels. But we used to hear that there are indeed wells, some in the gardens before the city and others inside, but because of the badness of the water in the city, cisterns of rainwater are prevalent; whether, however, any of these wells also exhibits the suspected antipathy, we do not know. As for the causes, if indeed these things happen in this way, one must accept them as in difficult matters. For it is plausible, on the one hand, that it is as Polybius says; and it is plausible, on the other hand, that some of the spring-feeding veins, being moistened from the outside, become slack and give a lateral discharge to the waters rather than squeezing them up along the ancient channel into the spring; and it is necessary that they be moistened when the wave overflows. But if, as Athenodorus says, what happens regarding high tides and ebb tides resembles inhalation and exhalation, there would be some of the flowing waters which naturally have their outflow to the surface through certain passages—the mouths of which we call springs and fountains—but through other passages are drawn back toward the depth of the sea; and, on the one hand, raising that sea up so that it floods, whenever what is like the exhalation occurs, they abandon their proper channel, but on the other hand, return again to their proper channel whenever that sea also takes its retreat.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 3.5.7καλυφθείσης μὲν αὐτῆς ὑπὸ τοῦ κύματος

    The feminine singular pronoun αὐτῆς is a genitive absolute referring back to τῆς γῆς (the surface of the earth) in the preceding clause. In the subsequent phrase γυμνωθείσης δὲ πάλιν, αὐτῆς is again understood as the subject of the genitive absolute.

  2. 3.5.7ὑδρευομένων συνεχῶς αὐθωρὸν

    The present participle in the genitive plural, ὑδρευομένων, is a genitive absolute with an unexpressed general subject ('when people are drawing water'). The subsequent phrase μηκέτι ὑδρευομένων uses the same construction.

  3. 3.5.7εἶναι ἄν τινα τῶν ῥεόντων ὑδάτων, ἃ ... συνέλκεται ... καὶ συνεξαίροντα μὲν ἐκείνην ... ἀπολείπει ... πάλιν δʼ ἀναχωρεῖ

    An infinitive with ἄν (εἶναι ἄν) expressing potentiality in the apodosis of a conditional sentence in indirect discourse. The relative pronoun ἃ refers back to the neuter plural τινά (part of τῶν ῥεόντων ὑδάτων). Since the subject is neuter plural, the main verbs within the relative clause (ἔχει, συνέλκεται, ἀπολείπει, ἀναχωρεῖ) are all in the third-person singular (Schema Atticum). However, the accompanying participle συνεξαίροντα agrees in gender and number with ἃ, appearing in the neuter plural nominative.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0099.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:3.5.7