- Source
- Strabo. Strabonis Geographica, Vols. 1-3. Meineke, August, editor. Leipzig: Teubner. 1877.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0099.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:17.1.43-17.1.44
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-28
The author discusses the decline of the oracle of Ammon and historians' accounts of Alexander's visit, followed by the worship of Osiris at Abydos, and the Tentyrites' unique hostility towards and control over crocodiles.
πολλὰ δʼ εἰρηκότες περὶ τοῦ Ἄμμωνος τοσοῦτον εἰπεῖν βουλόμεθα ὅτι τοῖς ἀρχαίοις μᾶλλον ἦν ἐν τιμῇ1 καὶ ἡ μαντικὴ καθόλου καὶ τὰ χρηστήρια, νυνὶ δʼ ὀλιγωρία κατέχει πολλή, τῶν Ῥωμαίων ἀρκουμένων τοῖς Σιβύλλης χρησμοῖς καὶ τοῖς Τυρρηνικοῖς θεοπροπίοις διά τε σπλάγχνων καὶ ὀρνιθείας καὶ διοσημιῶν. διόπερ καὶ τὸ ἐν Ἄμμωνι σχεδόν τι ἐκλέλειπται χρηστήριον, πρότερον δὲ ἐτετίμητο. δηλοῦσι δὲ μάλιστα τοῦτο οἱ τὰς Ἀλεξάνδρου πράξεις ἀναγράψαντες, προστιθέντες μὲν πολὺ καὶ τὸ τῆς κολακείας εἶδος ἐμφαίνοντες δέ τι καὶ πίστεως ἄξιον. ὁ γοῦν Καλλισθένης φησὶ τὸν Ἀλέξανδρον φιλοδοξῆσαι μάλιστα ἀνελθεῖν ἐπὶ τὸ χρηστήριον, ἐπειδὴ καὶ Περσέα ἤκουσε πρότερον ἀναβῆναι καὶ Ἡρακλέα· ὁρμήσαντα δʼ ἐκ Παραιτονίου καίπερ νότων ἐπιπεσόντων βιάσασθαι, πλανώμενον δʼ ὑπὸ τοῦ κονιορτοῦ σωθῆναι2 γενομένων ὄμβρων καὶ δυεῖν κοράκων ἡγησαμένων τὴν ὁδόν, ἤδη τούτων κολακευτικῶς λεγομένων· τοιαῦτα δὲ καὶ τὰ ἑξῆς· μόνῳ γὰρ δὴ τῷ βασιλεῖ τὸν ἱερέα ἐπιτρέψαι παρελθεῖν εἰς τὸν νεὼ μετὰ τῆς συνήθους στολῆς, τοὺς δʼ ἄλλους μετενδῦναι τὴν ἐσθῆτα, ἔξωθέν τε τῆς θεμιστείας ἀκροάσασθαι πάντας πλὴν Ἀλεξάνδρου, τοῦτον δʼ ἔνδοθεν. εἶναι δʼ οὐχ ὥσπερ ἐν Δελφοῖς καὶ Βραγχίδαις τὰς ἀποθεσπίσεις διὰ λόγων, ἀλλὰ νεύμασι καὶ συμβόλοις τὸ πλέον, ὡς καὶ παρʼ Ὁμήρῳ ἦ καὶ κυανέῃσιν ἐπʼ ὀφρύσι νεῦσε Κρονίων, τοῦ προφήτου τὸν Δία ὑποκριναμένου· τοῦτο μέντοι ῥητῶς εἰπεῖν τὸν ἄνθρωπον πρὸς τὸν βασιλέα ὅτι εἴη Διὸς υἱός. προστραγῳδεῖ δὲ τούτοις ὁ Καλλισθένης, ὅτι τοῦ Ἀπόλλωνος τὸ ἐν Βραγχίδαις μαντεῖον ἐκλελοιπότος, ἐξ ὅτου τὸ ἱερὸν ὑπὸ τῶν Βραγχιδῶν σεσύλητο ἐπὶ Ξέρξου περσισάντων, ἐκλελοιπυίας δὲ καὶ τῆς κρήνης, τότε ἥ τε κρήνη ἀνάσχοι καὶ μαντεῖα πολλὰ οἱ Μιλησίων πρέσβεις κομίσαιεν εἰς Μέμφιν περὶ τῆς ἐκ Διὸς γενέσεως τοῦ Ἀλεξάνδρου καὶ τῆς ἐσομένης περὶ Ἄρβηλα νίκης καὶ τοῦ Δαρείου θανάτου καὶ τῶν ἐν Λακεδαίμονι νεωτερισμῶν· περὶ δὲ τῆς εὐγενείας καὶ τὴν Ἐρυθραίαν Ἀθηναΐδα φησὶν ἀνειπεῖν· καὶ γὰρ ταύτην ὁμοίαν γενέσθαι τῇ παλαιᾷ Σιβύλλῃ τῇ Ἐρυθραίᾳ. τὰ μὲν δὴ τῶν συγγραφέων τοιαῦτα.
Having said much about Ammon, we wish to say only this, that in ancient times both divination in general and the oracles were held in greater honor, but now a great neglect prevails, since the Romans are satisfied with the oracles of the Sibyl and the Tyrrhenian prognostications by means of entrails, flight of birds, and signs from heaven. For this reason, the oracle at Ammon has also been almost entirely abandoned, though formerly it was held in honor. This is shown most clearly by those who wrote the history of Alexander’s deeds; for although they add much that shows the character of flattery, yet they also reveal some things that are worthy of belief. Callisthenes, at any rate, says that Alexander was most eager to go up to the oracle because he heard that Perseus and Heracles had gone up there before him; and that, having started from Paraitonion, although south winds fell upon him, he forced his way; and that, when he was lost in the dust, he was saved by the occurrence of rains and by two ravens that guided them on their way, these things being already said in a flattering manner; and the subsequent accounts are of the same kind: for indeed he says that the priest permitted the king alone to enter the temple in his usual dress, while the others changed their clothes, and that all except Alexander heard the oracle from without, but he from within. He says that the revelations were not given, as at Delphi and Branchidae, by means of words, but mostly by nods and symbols, as in Homer: “The son of Cronos spoke, and nodded with his dark brows,” the prophet acting the part of Zeus; however, the man explicitly told the king that he was the son of Zeus. To these things Callisthenes adds in a tragic style that, although the oracle of Apollo at Branchidae had ceased ever since the temple had been plundered by the Branchidae, who sided with the Persians in the time of Xerxes, and although the spring had also failed, yet at that time the spring burst forth again, and the ambassadors of the Milesians brought many oracles to Memphis concerning Alexander’s descent from Zeus, the victory that was to come near Arbela, the death of Darius, and the revolutions in Lacedaemon; and concerning his noble birth he says that the Erythraean Athenaïs also made proclamation, for she was like the ancient Erythraean Sibyl. Such, then, are the accounts of the historians.
Ἐν δὲ τῇ Ἀβύδῳ τιμῶσι τὸν Ὄσιριν· ἐν δὲ τῷ ἱερῷ τοῦ Ὀσίριδος οὐκ ἔξεστιν οὔτε ᾠδὸν οὔτε αὐλητὴν οὔτε ψάλτην ἀπάρχεσθαι3 τῷ θεῷ, καθάπερ τοῖς ἄλλοις θεοῖς ἔθος. μετὰ δὲ τὴν Ἄβυδον Διὸς πόλις ἡ μικρά, εἶτα Τέντυρα πόλις· ἐνταῦθα δὲ διαφερόντως παρὰ τοὺς ἄλλους Αἰγυπτίους ὁ κροκόδειλος ἠτίμωται καὶ ἔχθιστος τῶν ἁπάντων θηρίων νενόμισται. οἱ μὲν γὰρ ἄλλοι καίπερ εἰδότες τὴν κακίαν τοῦ ζῴου καὶ ὡς ὀλέθριον τῷ ἀνθρωπίνῳ γένει, σέβονται ὅμως καὶ ἀπέχονται· οὗτοι δὲ πάντα τρόπον ἀνιχνεύουσι καὶ ἐκφθείρουσιν αὐτούς· ἔνιοι δʼ ὥσπερ τοὺς Ψύλλους φασὶ τοὺς πρὸς τῇ Κυρηναίᾳ φυσικήν τινα ἀντιπάθειαν ἔχειν πρὸς τὰ ἑρπετά, οὕτω καὶ τοὺς Τεντυρίτας4 πρὸς τοὺς κροκοδείλους, ὥστε μηδὲν ὑπʼ αὐτῶν πάσχειν ἀλλὰ καὶ κολυμβᾶν ἀδεῶς καὶ διαπερᾶν, μηδενὸς ἄλλου θαρροῦντος· εἴς τε τὴν Ῥώμην κομισθεῖσι τοῖς κροκοδείλοις ἐπιδείξεως χάριν συνηκολούθουν οἱ Τεντυρῖται· γενομένης τε δεξαμενῆς καὶ πήγματός τινος ὑπὲρ μιᾶς τῶν πλευρῶν, ὥστε τοῖς θηρίοις ἐκβᾶσι τοῦ ὕδατος ἡλιαστήριον εἶναι, ἐκεῖνοι ἦσαν οἱ τοτὲ μὲν ἐξέλκοντες δικτύῳ πρὸς τὸ ἡλιαστήριον, ὡς καὶ ὑπὸ τῶν θεατῶν ὁραθῆναι, ἐμβαίνοντες ἅμα εἰς τὸ ὕδωρ, τοτὲ δὲ πάλιν εἰς τὴν δεξαμενὴν κατασπῶντες. τιμῶσι δὲ Ἀφροδίτην· ὄπισθεν δὲ τοῦ νεὼ τῆς Ἀφροδίτης Ἴσιδος ἔστιν ἱερόν· εἶτα τὰ Τυφώνια καλούμενα καὶ ἡ εἰς Κοπτὸν διῶρυξ, πόλιν κοινὴν Αἰγυπτίων τε καὶ Ἀράβων.
In Abydos they worship Osiris; and in the temple of Osiris it is not permitted for any singer, flute-player, or harp-player to begin a performance to the god, as is the custom for the other gods. After Abydos comes Diospolis Parva, then the city of Tentyra; here, unlike the other Egyptians, the crocodile is held in no honor, but is considered the most hateful of all beasts. For while the others, although they know the wickedness of the animal and how destructive it is to the human race, nevertheless worship it and refrain from harming it, these people trace them in every way and destroy them. Some say that just as the Psylli near Cyrenaica have a certain natural antipathy to reptiles, so the Tentyrites have it to crocodiles, so that they suffer no harm from them, but even dive and cross the river without fear, when no one else dares to do so. And when crocodiles were brought to Rome for exhibition, the Tentyrites accompanied them; a reservoir having been made, and a sort of platform over one of its sides, so that the beasts when they came out of the water might have a place to bask in the sun, these were the men who, entering into the water at the same time, would now drag them out with a net to the basking-place so that they might be seen by the spectators, and now drag them down again into the reservoir. They worship Aphrodite; and behind the temple of Aphrodite is a temple of Isis; then comes the place called Typhonia, and the canal leading to Coptos, a city common to both Egyptians and Arabs.
- 17.1.43τοῖς ἀρχαίοις μᾶλλον ἦν ἐν τιμῇ
The dative τοῖς ἀρχαίοις functions as a dative of possession or reference, literally meaning "was in honor for the ancients." It is contrasted with the subsequent clause νυνὶ δʼ ὀλιγωρία κατέχει πολλή (but now great neglect prevails).
- 17.1.43ὁρμήσαντα δʼ ἐκ Παραιτονίου... βιάσασθαι, πλανώμενον δʼ... σωθῆναι
This series of infinitives (βιάσασθαι, σωθῆναι, ἐπιτρέψαι, μετενδῦναι, etc.) depends on the main verb φησὶ (Callisthenes says) in an accusative-and-infinitive construction (indirect discourse). The accusative τὸν Ἀλέξανδρον (and its modifying participles ὁρμήσαντα, πλανώμενον) serves as the subject. The indirect speech is sustained through these multiple infinitives.
- 17.1.44ἀπάρχεσθαι
An infinitive in the middle voice meaning "to begin a sacrificial rite" or "to make a first offering." Here it describes a unique religious restriction at the temple of Osiris, where musicians are not allowed to perform initial offerings (aparche) to the god (governed by οὐκ ἔξεστιν).
- 17.1.44ἔνιοι δʼ ὥσπερ τοὺς Ψύλλους φασὶ... οὕτω καὶ τοὺς Τεντυρίτας
A comparative structure using ὥσπερ... οὕτω καί... ("just as... so also..."). The entire clause is embedded in an accusative-and-infinitive construction governed by φασὶ (some say), with τοὺς Ψύλλους and τοὺς Τεντυρίτας functioning as the subjects of the infinitive ἔχειν.
